The aim of this study was to explore maternal responses to the diagnosis of learning disabilities in children using a focus group approach. The findings identified four central themes: differences between antenatal and postnatal diagnosis, whereby the former presented a dilemma in relation to the option of termination; reactions from the participants being comparable to a recognized cycle of bereavement; issues relating to causation; and examples of poor interpersonal skills from the medical services. Overall, analysis demonstrated that maternal responses appear to be a complex set of intertwined emotional and cognitive behaviours. External influences were predominantly negative or pessimistic, often manifesting within a moral and ethical framework of making a decision on the prospective genetic worth of a human being.
ALEXANDER, D.
& KLEIN, D. (2000) `Bad News Is Bad News: Let's Not Make It Worse', Trauma2 (1): 11-18.
2.
ASTON, R.
(1998) `Genetic Counselling Must Be Non-Directive', British Medical Journal317 (82).
3.
BARRETT, S.
(1999) `Misconceptions about Immunisation', Quackwatch, online (accessed 20 November 2000): http://www.familyinternet.com/quackwatch/03HealthPromotion/immu/autism.html.
4.
BENSON, D.
& HUGHES, J. (1983) The Perspective of Ethnomethodology. London: Longman.
5.
BHAUMIK, S.
, BRANFORD, D., MCGROTHER, C. & THORP, C. (1997) `Autistic Traits in Adults with Learning Disabilities', British Journal of Psychiatry170 (6): 502-509.
6.
BURNARD, P.
(1991) `A Method of Analysing Interview Transcripts in Qualitative Research', Nurse Education Today11 (6): 461-466.
7.
CAREY, M.
(1996) `Comment: Concerns in the Analysis of Focus Group Data', Qualitative Health Research5 (4): 487-495.
8.
CHANDLER, M.
& SMITH, A. (1998) `Prenatal Screening and Women's Perception of Infant Disability: A Sophie's Choice for Every Mother', Nursing Inquiry5 (2): 71-76.
9.
CHAPPLE, A.
, CAMPION, P. & MAY, C. (1997) `Clinical Terminology: Anxiety and Confusion amongst Families Undergoing Genetic Counselling', Patient Education and Counselling32 (1): 81-91.
10.
CLORE, G.
(1994) `Why Emotions Require Cognition', in P. EKMAN & R. DAVIDSON (eds) The Nature of Emotions: Fundamental Question, pp. 181-191. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
DALE, N.
(1996) Working with Families of Children with Special Needs: Partnership and Practice. London: Routledge.
12.
DASZAK, P.
(1997) `Detection and Comparative Analysis of Persistent Measles Virus Infection in Crohn's Disease by Immunogold Electron Microscopy', Journal of Clinical Pathology50 (4): 299-304.
13.
HALL, D.
& HILL, P. (1996) The Child with a Disability, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell Science.
14.
HERBERT, M.
(1996) Supporting Bereaved and Dying Children and their Parents. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
15.
INGSTAD, B.
& WHYTE, S. (eds) (1995) Disability and Culture. London: University of California Press.
16.
JAMES, A.
(2001) `Hearing the Worst', The Guardian Society, 25 April: 5-5.
17.
KITZINGER, J.
(1995) `Introducing Focus Groups', British Medical Journal311: 299-302.
18.
KROON, R. (1988) Masters thesis, Psychology Department, University of Amsterdam, in B. PARKINSON (1995) Ideas and Realities of Emotion. London: Routledge.
19.
LAMB, M.
& MEYER, D. (1991) `Fathers of Children with Special Needs', in M. SELIGMAN (ed.) The Family of a Handicapped Child, 2nd edn.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
20.
LAZARUS, R.
(1994) `The Past and the Present in Emotion', in P. ELKMAN & R. DAVIDSON (eds) The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
LIPPMAN, A.
(1992) `Mother Matters: A Fresh Look at Prenatal Genetic Testing', Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering5 (2) 141-154.
22.
MARSHAK, L.
& SELIGMAN, M. (1993) Counselling Persons with Disabilities: Theoretical and Clinical Perspectives. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
23.
MAYS, N.
& POPE, C. (1995) `Rigour in Qualitative Research', British Medical Journal311 (6997): 109-112.
24.
MORGAN, D.
(1996) `Focus Groups', in J. HAGAN & K. COOK (eds) Annual Review of Sociology vol. 22, pp. 129-152. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
25.
MORGAN, D.
(1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
ONG, L.
, DE HAES, J., HOOS, A. & LAMMES, F. (1995) `Doctor-Patient Communication: A Review of the Literature', Social Science and Medicine40 (7): 903-918.
27.
POLIT, D.
& HUNGLER, B. (1997) Essentials of Nursing Research. New York: Lippincott.
28.
ROBINSON, N.
(1999) `The Use of Focus Group Methodology: With Selected Examples from Sexual Health Research', Journal of Advanced Nursing29 (4): 905-913.
29.
ROBSON, C.
(1996) Real World Research. Oxford: Blackwell.
30.
SIM, J.
(1998) `Collecting and Analysing Qualitative Data: Issues Raised by the Focus Groups', Journal of Advanced Nursing28 (2): 345-352.
31.
STACEY, M.
(1996) `The New Genetics: A Feminist View', in T. MARTEAU & M. RICHARDS (eds) The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics, p. 342-342. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
TAYLOR, D.
(1995) `Severe Mental Handicap', in D. HARVEY, M. MILES & D. SMYTH (eds) Community Child Health and Paediatrics. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
33.
WAKEFIELD, A.
(1993) `Evidence of Persistent Measles Virus Infection in Crohn's Disease', Journal of Medical Virology39 (4): 345-353.
34.
WAKEFIELD, A.
, MURCH, S., ANTHONY, A., LINNELL, J., CASSON, D. & MALIK, M. (1998) `Ileal-Lymphoid-Nodular Hyperplasia, Non-Specific Colitis and Pervasive Developmental Disorders in Children', Lancet351 (9103): 637-641.
35.
WICKLER, L.
(1986) `Family Stress Theory and Research on Families of Children with Mental Retardation', in J. GALLAGHER & P. VIETZE (eds) Families of Handicapped Persons: Research, Programmes and Policy Issues. Baltimore, MD: Brooks.
