Teachers play a central role in shaping their classroom learning environments and students’ access to literacy practices. The purpose of this study was to examine one first-grade teacher’s discourse during writing to understand how a teacher implements generative writing instruction and opens us space for student agency. Using sociocultural discourse analysis, data were collected via interviews with the teacher and audio recordings of her discourse during 10 writing sessions. Analyses revealed certain types of discourse and teacher beliefs and characteristics conducive to generative writing opportunities. The study adds to our understanding of the teacher’s role in a classroom writing community, how transcription and composition instruction can coexist, and discursive methods to incorporate generative writing opportunities into early-grade classrooms. This research challenges teachers to reconsider how their discourse may influence students’ writing and agentic opportunities at a time when children are just beginning to develop their writer identities.
ApplebeeAN (2000) Writing development. In: IndrisanoRSquireJR (eds) Perspectives on Writing: Research, Theory, and Practice. International Reading Association, pp. 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1598/0872072681.4
2.
BeachRNewellGEVanDerHeideJ (2015) A sociocultural perspective on writing development: toward an agenda for classroom research on students’ use of social practices. In: MacArthurCAGrahamSFitzgeraldJ (eds) Handbook of Writing Research. 2nd edition. Guilford Publications, pp. 11–23.
3.
BerningerVWCartwrightAYatesC, et al. (1994) Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal6(2): 161–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01026911
4.
BlackledgeACreeseA (2009) Meaning-making as dialogic process: official and carnival lives in the language classroom. Journal of Language, Identity and Education8(4): 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348450903130413
5.
BloomeDClarkC (2012) Discourse-in-use. In: GreenJLCamilliGElmorePB (eds) Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research. Routledge, pp. 227–241.
BoydMP (2015) Relations between teacher questioning and student talk in one elementary ELL classroom. Journal of Literacy Research47(3): 370–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16632451
8.
BoydMP (2016) Connecting “man in the mirror”: developing a classroom dialogic teaching and learning trajectory. L1: Educational Studies in Language and Literature16: 1–26.
9.
BoydMP (2023) Teacher talk that supports thinking and talking together: three markers of a dialogic instructional stance. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction39(1): 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100695
10.
BoydMPGaldaL (2011) Real Talk in Elementary Classrooms: Effective Oral Language Practice. Guilford Press.
BoydMPChiuMMKongY (2019) Signaling a language of possibility space: management of a dialogic discourse modality through speculation and reasoning word usage. Linguistics and Education50: 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.03.002
13.
CazdenCB (1998) Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Heinemann.
14.
CazdenCB (2001) Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. 2nd edition. Heinemann.
15.
CokerDLFarley-RippleEJacksonA, et al. (2016) Writing instruction in first grade: an observational study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal29: 793–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9596-6
16.
CokerDLJenningsASFarley-RippleE, et al. (2018) When the type of practice matters: the relationship between typical writing instruction, student practice, and writing achievement in first grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology54: 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.013
17.
Compton-LillyC (2006) Identity, childhood culture, and literacy learning: a case study. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy6(1): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798406062175
18.
CorsaroWA (2003) We’re Friends, Right? Inside Kids’ Cultures. Joseph Henry Press.
19.
CutlerLGrahamS (2008) Primary grade writing instruction: a national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology100(4): 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012656
20.
DicksonV (2005) The nature of student and teacher discourse in an elementary classroom. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue7(1): 109–122.
21.
DukeNK (2014) Information in action. Scholastic Teaching Resources.
22.
DukeNKPurcell-GatesVHallLA, et al. (2006) Authentic literacy activities for developing comprehension and writing. The Reading Teacher60(4): 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.60.4.4
23.
DysonAH (2020) “This isn’t my real writing”: the fate of children’s agency in too-tight curricula. Theory Into Practice59(2): 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702390
24.
DysonAHGenishiC (2005) On the Case: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research (An NCRLL Volume). Teachers College Press.
GeeJP (2011) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 3rd edition. Routledge.
27.
GerdeHKBinghamGEWasikBA (2012) Writing in early childhood classrooms: guidance for best practices. Early Childhood Education Journal40(6): 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0531-z
GrahamSBollingerAOlsonCB, et al. (2012a) Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: a practice guide. NCEE 2012-4058. What Works Clearinghouse. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED533112
31.
GrahamSMcKeownDKiuharaS, et al. (2012b) A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology104(4): 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
32.
GrønliKMWalgermoBRMcTigueEM, et al. (2025) Feedback practices on young students’ oral reading: a systematic review. Review of Educational Research96(5): 1306070.
33.
GutierrezKD (1993) How talk, context, and script shape contexts for learning: a cross-case comparison of journal sharing. Linguistics and Education5(3): 335–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90005-u
34.
HsiangTPGrahamSYangYM (2020) Teachers’ practices and beliefs about teaching writing: a comprehensive survey of grades 1 to 3 teachers. Reading and Writing33: 2511–2548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10050-4
35.
JasmineJWeinerW (2007) The effects of writing workshop on abilities of first grade students to become confident and independent writers. Early Childhood Education Journal35(2): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0186-3
36.
JohnstonPH (2004) Choice Words: How Our Language Affects Children's Learning. Stenhouse Publishers.
37.
KennedyEShielG (2022) Writing assessment for communities of writers: rubric validation to support formative assessment of writing in Pre-K to grade 2. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice29(2): 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2047608
38.
KubyCRVaughnM (2015) Young children's identities becoming: exploring agency in the creation of multimodal literacies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy15(4): 433–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798414566703
39.
MatsumuraLCPatthey-ChavezGGValdésR, et al. (2002) Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and third-grade students’ revision in lower- and higher-achieving urban schools. The Elementary School Journal103(1): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/499713
40.
MercerN (2004) Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics1: 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137
41.
MercerNDawesL (2014) The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s. Oxford Review of Education40(4): 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.934087
42.
MillerB (ed) (2018) Writing Development in Struggling Learners: Understanding the Needs of Writers Across the Lifecourse. Brill.
MoYKopkeRAHawkinsLK, et al. (2014) The neglected “R” in the time of the common core. The Reading Teacher67: 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1227/0
45.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (2012) The Condition of Education, 2012 (NCES 2012-045). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences website.
46.
NystrandM (2006) Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English40(4): 392–412. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte20065107
47.
PerryKH (2012) What is literacy? A critical overview of sociocultural perspectives. The Journal of Language & Literacy Education8(1): 50–71.
48.
PriorP (2006) A sociocultural theory of writing. In: MacArthurCGrahamSFitzgeraldJ (eds) Handbook of Writing Research. Guilford Press, pp. 54–66.
49.
RyanMKhosronejadMBartonG, et al. (2021) A reflexive approach to teaching writing: enablements and constraints in primary school classrooms. Written Communication38(3): 417–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883211005558
50.
SaldañaJ (2021) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 4th edition. SAGE Publications.
51.
SchuldtLC (2019) Feedback in action: examining teachers’ oral feedback to elementary writers. Teaching and Teacher Education83: 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.020
52.
TabaH (1966) Teaching Strategies and Cognitive Functioning in Elementary School Children. San Francisco State College.
53.
TolchinskyL (2015) The emergence of writing. In: MacArthurCAGrahamSFitzgeraldJ (eds) Handbook of Writing Research. 2nd edition. Guilford Publications, pp. 144–159.
54.
VaughnM (2014) The role of student agency: exploring openings during literacy instruction. Teaching and Learning: The Journal of Natural Inquiry and Reflective Practice1(1): 4-16.
55.
VaughnM (2021) What is student agency and why is it needed now more than ever. Student agency: theoretical implications for practice [themed journal issue]. Theory Into Practice59(2): 109–118.
56.
VygotskyLS (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
YedlinJA (2003) Teacher Talk and Writing Development in an Urban first-grade: English as a Second Language Classroom. Harvard University.
58.
ZimmermanBJRisembergR (1997) Becoming a self-regulated writer: a social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology22(1): 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
