This study explores the perceptions and experiences of six elementary teachers who received Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling (LETRS) training, totaling 120-150 hours. The teachers were also supported by an instructional coach when tasked with teaching the newly adopted 95% Core Phonics Program for K-3 students. A multiple case study approach was used, including qualitative data from five classroom observations (30-45 minutes each) of Tier 1 literacy instruction and one semi-structured interview per teacher (30-60 minutes). The findings highlight four key themes: 1) Implementing Reforms Requires Emotional Labor and Time Beyond Contracted Expectations, 2) Teacher Expectations of Student Success using the Structured Program Influenced Instructional Decisions During Early Implementation, 3) Maintaining Student Engagement and Motivation Still Requires Instructional Responsiveness and Adaptations Within a Structured Curriculum, and 4) Early-Phase Instructional Coaching Supports Confidence during Instruction. These findings hold important implications for educational policy and practice, particularly in light of increasing mandates related to the science of reading. Further research is recommended to deepen the understanding of teacher and student experiences, focusing on ensuring meaningful engagement and motivation, irrespective of instructional approaches.
AbbottMGoodRHIIIGrayJS, et al. (2020) Acadience® Reading 7-8 Assessment Manual. Acadience Learning Inc.
2.
AllingtonRL (2013) What really matters when working with struggling readers. The Reading Teacher66(7): 520–530.
3.
AzevedoJPGoldembergDMontoyaS, et al. (2021) Will Every Child be Able to Read by 2030? Defining Learning Poverty and Mapping the Dimensions of the Challenge. World Bank Group.
4.
BondGLDykstraR (1967) The cooperative research program in first grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly5: 142.
5.
BrandtLSharpACGardnerDS (2021) Examination of teacher practices on student motivation for reading. The Reading Teacher74(6): 723–731.
6.
CarlisleJBerebitskyD (2010) Literacy coaching as a component of professional development. Reading and Writing24(7): 773–800.
7.
CastlesARastleKNationK (2018) Ending the reading wars: reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest19(1): 5–51.
8.
ChettyRFriedmanJNRockoffJE (2014) Measuring the impacts of teachers II: teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. The American Economic Review104(9): 2633–2679.
9.
CiampaKGallagherT (2021) The development and validation of the Teachers' self- efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction in the 21st century (TBLI21c) scale: a pilot study. Journal of Research in Reading44(3): 654–674.
10.
CoburnCE (2001) Collective sensemaking about reading: how teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis23(2): 145–170.
11.
CoburnCEWoulfinSL (2012) Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly47(1): 5–30.
12.
CreswellJW (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th edition. Sage.
13.
DoleJADonaldsonR (2006) “What am I supposed to do all day?”: three big ideas for the reading coach. The Reading Teacher59(5): 486–488.
14.
DresserR (2012) The impact of scripted literacy instruction on teachers and students. Issues in Teacher Education21(1): 71–87.
15.
FiesterL (2010) Early Warning! Why Reading by the End of Third Grade Matters. KIDS COUNT Special Report. Annie E. Casey Foundation.
16.
FuchsLSSeethalerPMFuchsD, et al. (2023) Severe pandemic learning loss and the promise of remotely delivered intervention in students with comorbid reading and mathematics learning difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities56(4): 278–294.
17.
GibbsGR (2014) Qualitative analysis. Qualitative Data Analysis, Vol. 277.
18.
GriffithR (2008) The impact of a scripted reading program on teachers’ professional spirits. Teaching and Learning22(3): 121–133.
19.
GuoYSunSBreit-SmithA, et al. (2015) Behavioral engagement and reading achievement in elementary-school-age children: a longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology107(2): 332.
20.
HernandezDJ (2011) Double Jeopardy: How third-grade Reading Skills and Poverty Influence High School Graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation.
21.
HudsonAKMooreKAHanB, et al. (2021) Elementary teachers’ knowledge of foundational literacy skills: a critical piece of the puzzle in the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly56: S287–S315.
22.
KaganDM (1992) Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist27(1): 65–90.
23.
KilpatrickDA (2015) Essentials of Assessing, Preventing, and Overcoming Reading Difficulties. John Wiley & Sons.
24.
KraftMABlazarDHoganD (2018) The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: a meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research88(4): 547–588.
25.
LesnickJGoergeRSmithgallC, et al. (2010) Reading on Grade Level in Third Grade: How is it Related to High School Performance and College Enrollment. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, Vol. 1, 12.
26.
LincolnYSLynhamSAGubaEG (2011) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research4(2): 97–128.
27.
ManginMM (2009) Literacy coach role implementation: how district context influences reform efforts. Educational Administration Quarterly45(5): 759–792.
28.
ManyJEDewberryDTaylorDL, et al. (2009) Profiles of three preservice ESOL teachers' development of instructional scaffolding. Reading Psychology30(2): 148–174.
29.
MargolisHMcCabePP (2006) Motivating struggling readers in an era of mandated instructional practices. Reading Psychology27(5): 435–455.
30.
MatherNBosCBaburN (2001) Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice teachers about early literacy instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities34(5): 472–482.
31.
McKenneySBradleyB (2016) Assessing teacher beliefs about early literacy curriculum implementation. Early Child Development and Care186(9): 1415–1428.
32.
MedinaALHancockSDHathawayJIPilonietaPHolshouserKO (2021) The influence of sustained, school-based professional development on explicit reading comprehension strategy instruction.Reading Psychology42(8): 807–835.
33.
MerriamSB (2002) Introduction to qualitative research. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis1(1): 1–17.
34.
MoatsLC (2020) Teaching reading “is” rocket science: what expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. American Educator44(2): 4.
35.
MoatsLCTolmanC (2009) Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling, (LETRS). 2nd edition. Sopris West.
36.
National Center for Education Statistics (2022) The Nation’s Report Card: A First Look: 2022 Mathematics and Reading. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
37.
NeumanSBWrightT (2010) Promoting language and literacy development for early childhood educators: a mixed-methods study of coursework and coaching. The Elementary School Journal111(1): 63–86.
38.
RupleyWHBlairTRNicholsWD (2009) Effective reading instruction for struggling readers: the role of direct/explicit teaching. Reading & Writing Quarterly25(2–3): 125–138.
39.
RyanRMDeciEL (2020) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology61: 101860.
40.
SchachterRESpearCFPiastaSB, et al. (2016) Early childhood educators' knowledge, beliefs, education, experiences, and children's language- and literacy-learning opportunities: what is the connection?Early Childhood Research Quarterly36: 281–294.
41.
SeidenbergMSCooper BorkenhagenMKearnsDM (2020) Lost in translation? Challenges in connecting reading science and educational practice. Reading Research Quarterly55: S119–S130.
42.
ShanahanT (2020) What constitutes a science of reading instruction?Reading Research Quarterly55: S235–S247.
43.
ShulmanLS (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher15(2): 4–14.
44.
SimmonsMClarkSKFeinauerE, et al. (2022) How reading motivation and the expectancy-value beliefs of ninth graders influence language arts course enrollment decisions and why this matters. Reading Psychology43(2): 179–207.
45.
StakeRE (2013) Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford Press.
46.
TealeWHWhittinghamCEHoffmanEB (2020) Early literacy research, 2006–2015: a decade of measured progress. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy20(2): 169–222.
47.
The 95% Group (2020) 95 Phonics core Program. 95% Group LLC.
48.
VaughnSMartinezLWilliamsKJ, et al. (2022) Effects of a reading intervention and a mentoring intervention for ninth-grade English learners with reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness15(3): 558–583.
49.
Vernon-FeagansLKainzKAmendumS, et al. (2012) Targeted reading intervention: a coaching model to help classroom teachers with struggling readers. Learning Disability Quarterly35(2): 102–114.
50.
WanzekJOtaibaSASchatschneiderC, et al. (2020) Intensive intervention for upper elementary students with severe reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness13(3): 408–429.
WigfieldAMuenksKEcclesJS (2021) Achievement motivation: what we know and where we are going. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology3: 87–111.
53.
WilliamsKJMartinezLRFallA-M, et al. (2021) Student engagement among high school English learners with reading comprehension difficulties. School Psychology Review52: 38–56.
54.
YinRK (2009) How to do better case studies. The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods2: 254–282.
