Do third grade students from low-income families have access to ‘just right’ books? Results from a home visit study

Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which third graders (n = 84) from predominantly low-socioeconomic status families had access to books matched to their reading levels in their homes. On average, students showed home visitors books that fell within the Common Core State Standards’ recommended text difficulty range for Grade 3 (mean Lexile = 587L). However, students who passed a state-mandated reading test (‘good readers’) had books with reading demands well below their reading levels. In contrast, students who failed a state-mandated reading test (‘poor readers’) had books with reading demands well above their reading levels. Findings suggest that poor readers would have limited opportunities to experience successful independent reading in the home, while good readers may find minimal challenge in the books accessible in the home. Findings have implications for efforts dedicated to increasing students’ access to books.

Keywords

Book reading children’s books home home literacy environment low-income families texts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aikens

Barbarin

(2008) Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology 100(2): 235–251.

Allington

McCuiston

Billen

(2015) What research says about text complexity and learning to read. Reading Teacher 68(7): 491–501.

Amendum

Conradi

Hiebert

(2017) Does text complexity matter in the elementary grades? A research synthesis of text difficulty and elementary students’ reading fluency and comprehension. Educational Psychology Review 30(1): 1–31.

Amendum

Conradi

Liebfreund

(2016) The push for more challenging texts: An analysis of early readers’ rate, accuracy, and comprehension. Reading Psychology 37(4): 570–600.

Benjamin

(2012) Reconstructing readability: Recent developments and recommendations in the analysis of text difficulty. Educational Psychology Review 24(1): 63–88.

Bjork

(2011) Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In: Gernsbacher

Pew

Hough

, et al. (eds) Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society. New York: Worth Publishers, pp. 56–64.

Bradley

Corwyn

McAdoo

, et al. (2001) The home environments of children in the United States part I: Variations by age, ethnicity, and poverty status. Child Development 72(6): 1844–1867.

Burgess

Hecht

Lonigan

(2002) Relations of the home literacy environment (HLE) to the development of reading-related abilities: A one-year longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly 37(4): 408–426.

Chin

Phillips

(2004) Social reproduction and child-rearing practices: Social class, children’s agency, and the summer activity gap. Sociology of Education 77(3): 185–210.

10.

Compton-Lilly

Caloia

Quast

, et al. (2016) A closer look at a summer reading program: Listening to students and parents. Reading Teacher 70(1): 59–67.

11.

Constantino

(2005) Print environments between high and low socioeconomic status communities. Teacher Librarian 32(3): 22–25.

12.

Dickinson

Neuman

(2006) Handbook of Early Literacy Research: Volume II. New York: Guilford Press.

13.

Dzaldov

Peterson

(2005) Book leveling and readers. Reading Teacher 59(3): 222–229.

14.

Eastman

(1968) The Best Nest. New York: Random House Inc.

15.

Edwards

(2011) Access to books makes a difference. Reading Today 28(6): 16.

16.

Elmore

Sipper

(2017) Lexile measures and beginning readers: The scoop on this latest innovation and how it will impact the industry. Available at: https://metametricsinc.com/lexile-measures-beginning-readers-scoop-latest-innovation-will-impact-industry/ (accessed 27 February 2020).

17.

Fitzgerald

Elmore

Koons

, et al. (2014) Important text characteristics for early-grades text complexity. Journal of Educational Psychology 107(1): 4–29.

18.

Fulmer

D’Mello

Strain

, et al. (2015) Interest-based text preference moderates the effect of text difficulty on engagement and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology 41: 98–110.

19.

Gottfried

Schlackman

Gottfried

, et al. (2015) Parental provision of early literacy environment as related to reading and educational outcomes across the academic lifespan. Parenting: Science and Practice 15(1): 24–38.

20.

Hiebert

(2012) Readability and the common core’s staircase of text complexity. Available at: http://textproject.org/library/text-matters/common-core-state-standards-and-assessment/readability-and-the-common-core-staircase-of-text-complexity/ (accessed 27 February 2020).

21.

Hiebert EH (2014) Designing learning for and from complex texts. Available at: http://textproject.org/assets/library/powerpoints/Hiebert-2014-10-09-Designing-Learning-for-and-from-complex-text.pdf (accessed 17 March 2020).

22.

Hoover

Dunbar

Frisbie

, et al. (2003) The Iowa Tests, Guide to Research and Development, Forms A and B. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

23.

Judge

(2013) Longitudinal predictors of reading achievement among at-risk children. Journal of Children & Poverty 19(1): 1.

24.

Katzir

Lesaux

Kim

(2009) The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 22(3): 261–276.

25.

Kim

Guryan

(2010) The efficacy of a voluntary summer book reading intervention for low-income Latino children from language minority families. Journal of Educational Psychology 102(1): 20–31.

26.

Kim

Guryan

White

, et al. (2016) Delayed effects of a low-cost and large-scale summer reading intervention on elementary school children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 9(1): 1–22.

27.

Kinney

(2007) Diary of a Wimpy Kid. New York: Scholastic, Inc.

28.

Kintsch

(1991) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Advances in Psychology 79: 107–153.

29.

Lesaux

(2012) Reading and reading instruction for children from low-income and non-English-speaking households. The Future of Children 22(2): 73–88.

30.

Lowry L (1993) The Giver. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

31.

Mbella

Zhu

Karkee

, et al.; North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (2016) The North Carolina Testing Program Technical Report 2012–2015. English language arts/reading assessments (ELA) End of Grade 3-8 and End-of-Course English II. Available at: www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/accountability/testing/technotes/mathtechreport1215.pdf (accessed 27 February 2020).

32.

Mesmer

Cunningham

Hiebert

(2012) Toward a theoretical model of text complexity for the early grades: Learning from the past, anticipating the future. Reading Research Quarterly 47(3): 235–258.

33.

Mesmer

Hiebert

(2015) Third graders’ reading proficiency reading texts varying in complexity and length: Responses of students in an urban, high-needs school. Journal of Literacy Research 47(4): 473–504.

34.

MetaMetrics, Inc. (2008) Lexile measures at home. Available at: cdn.lexile.com/m/cms_page_media/135/Lexiles-at-Home_2.pdf (accessed 27 February 2020).

35.

MetaMetrics, Inc. (2009) Linking state assessments with the Lexile and Quantile frameworks. Available at: https://cdn.lexile.com/m/uploads/linking-studies/Lexile-and-Quantile-Linking-Studies.pdf (accessed 27 February 2020).

36.

MetaMetrics, Inc. (2015) NC READY EOG Reading/EOC English II – Lexile linking report. Available at: www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/accountability/testing/technotes/mathtechreport1215.pdf (accessed 27 February 2020).

37.

MetaMetrics, Inc. (2017a) What is a Lexile measure? Available at: https://lexile.com/about-lexile/lexile-overview/ (accessed 27 February 2020).

38.

MetaMetrics, Inc. (2017b) Lexile-to-grade correspondence. Available at: https://lexile.com/about-lexile/grade-equivalent/grade-equivalent-chart/ (accessed 27 February 2020).

39.

MetaMetrics, Inc. (2017c) Matching Lexile levels to grade ranges. Available at: https://lexile.com/educators/measuring-growth-with-lexile/lexile-measures-grade-equivalents/ (accessed 27 February 2020).

40.

Mol

Bus

(2011) To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin 137(2): 267–296.

41.

Myers

(2001) The Greatest: Muhammad Ali. New York: Scholastic, Inc.

42.

Nation

(2007) Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In: Snowling

Hulme

(eds) The Science of Reading: A Handbook (pp. 209–226). Malden: Blackwell.

43.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (2010) Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. Appendix A: Research Supporting Key Elements of the Standards Glossary of Key Terms, Washington D.C.

44.

North Carolina Public Schools Accountability Services Division. (n.d.). Lexiles: Information for parents. Available at: www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/parents/lexiles/?&print=true (accessed 27 February 2020).

45.

Recht

Leslie

(1988) Effect of prior knowledge on good and poor readers’ memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology 80(1): 16–20.

46.

Reed

Kershaw-Herrera

(2016) An examination of text complexity as characterized by readability and cohesion. The Journal of Experimental Education 84(1): 75–97.

47.

Renaissance Learning, Inc. (2016) What kids are reading and how they grow: Annual report 2016. Available at: http://info.renaissance.com/WhatKidsAreReadingLearnalyticsDownload_01LP.html (accessed 27 February 2020).

48.

Saenz

Felix

(2007) English-speaking Latino parents’ literacy practices in Southern California. Communication Disorders Quarterly 28(2): 93–106.

49.

Santoro

Baker

Fien

, et al (2016) Using read-alouds to help struggling readers access and comprehend complex, informational text. Teaching Exceptional Children 48(6): 282–292.

50.

Scarborough

Dobrich

(1994) On the efficacy of reading to preschoolers. Developmental Review 14(3): 245–302.

51.

Schmitt

Simpson

Friend

(2011) A longitudinal assessment of the home literacy environment and early language. Infant and Child Development 20(6): 409–431.

52.

Sénéchal

LeFevre

(2002) Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development 73(2): 445–460.

53.

Seuss

(1957) The Cat in the Hat. New York: Random House.

54.

Seuss

(1960a) Green Eggs and Ham. New York: Random House.

55.

Stenner

Burdick

Sanford

, et al. (2006) How accurate are Lexile text measures? Journal of Applied Measurement 7: 307–322.

56.

Taylor

(1987) The Gold Cadillac. New York: Dial Books.

57.

Vygotsky

(1978) Mind and Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

58.

White

Kim

(2008) Teacher and parent scaffolding of voluntary summer reading. The Reading Teacher 62(2): 116–125.

59.

White

Kim

Kingston

, et al. (2014) Replicating the effects of a teacher-scaffolded voluntary summer reading program: The role of poverty. Reading Research Quarterly 49(1): 5–30.

60.

Williamson

Fitzgerald

Stenner

(2013) The common core state standards’ quantitative text complexity trajectory: Figuring out how much complexity is enough. Educational Researchers 42(2): 59–69.

61.

Wolfe

Schreiner

Rehder

, et al. (1998) Learning from text: Matching readers and texts by latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25(2–3): 309–336.