This paper examines the ways in which Mattel’s Barbie Girls and Xtractaurs, online sites aimed at girls and boys of six years of age and up, respectively, offer markedly distinct literate and semiotic resources for their young users. Analysis focuses on the multimodal layers of meaning and the mediating tools, artefacts, and literacy objects that both afford and constrain certain types of play and shape the possibilities for self-representation and interaction in these spaces. Through content analysis and comparison of the two sites, the authors explore the kinds of discourses made available in these spaces and examine how they might impact on young players’ perceptions of the social roles and life opportunities accessible to them both within and outside of these virtual worlds.
AlvermannDEHagoodMC (2000) Critical media literacy: research, theory, and practice in “new times.”. The Journal of Educational Research93(3): 193–204.
2.
BartlettL (2005) Identity work and cultural artefacts in literacy learning and use: a sociocultural analysis. Language and Education19(1): 1–9.
3.
BlackRW (2009) Adolescents and Online Fan Fiction, New York, NY: Peter Lang.
4.
BlackRW (2010) The language of Webkinz: early childhood literacy in an online virtual world. Digital Culture and Education2(1): 7–24.
5.
BlackRWReichSM (2011) Affordances and constraints of scaffolded learning in a virtual world for young children. International Journal of Game-Based Learning1(2): 52–64.
6.
BuckinghamD (2003) Media education: literacy, learning and contemporary culture, Cambridge, UK: Polity.
7.
BuckinghamDSefton-GreenJ (2004) Structure, agency, and pedagogy in children’s media culture. In: TobinJ (ed.) Pikachu’s Global Adventure: the Rise and Fall of Pokémon, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 12–33.
8.
BurnettCMerchantG (2011) Is there a space for critical literacy in social media?English Teaching: Practice and Critique10(1): 41–57.
9.
CarringtonV (2003) “‘I’m in a bad mood Let’s go shopping’: Interactive dolls, consumer culture and a ‘glocalized’ model of literacy.”. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy3(1): 83–98.
10.
CarringtonV (2012) Barbies and chimps: text and childhoods in virtual worlds. In: MerchantGGillenJMarshJDaviesJ (eds) Virtual Literacies: Interactive Spaces for Children and Young People, London: Routledge.
11.
CarringtonVHodgettsK (2010) Literacy-lite in barbie girls. British Journal of Sociology of Education31(6): 671–682.
12.
Compete, Inc. (2010) “Site Comparison of Webkinz.com (rank #420), Clubpenguin.com (#505), Barbiegirls.com (#4,341). Available at: Compete.com (accessed 31 July 2012).
13.
DysonAH (1997) Writing Superheroes: Contemporary Childhood, Popular Culture, and Classroom Literacy, Williston, VT: Teachers College Press.
GeeJP (1990) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education, New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
GeeJP (1999) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
GeeJP (2005) Pleasure, learning, video games, and life: the projective stance. E-Learning and Digital Media2(3): 211–223.
18.
GirouxHA (1994) Disturbing Pleasures: Learning Popular Culture, London, UK: Routledge.
19.
IserW (1980) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
Ito M (2001) Technologies of the childhood imagination: media mixes, hypersociality, and recombinant cultural form. In: Paper presented at the Society for the Social Studies of Science meeting, Boston, MA. Available at: http://www.itofisher.com/mito/archives/techno imagination.pdf (accessed 25 April 2012).
21.
KressG (1997) Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy, London: Routledge.
22.
KressG (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age, London: Routledge.
23.
LemkeJ (2005) Critical analysis across media: games, franchises, and the new cultural order. In: Labarto PostigoM (ed.) Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, Valencia: University of Valencia (CD ROM edition).
24.
Levi-StraussC (1974) The Savage Mind, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
25.
LukeC (1997) Media literacy and cultural studies. In: MusprattSLukeAFreebodyP (eds) Constructing Critical Literacies: Teaching and Learning Textual Practice, Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin, pp. 19–49.
26.
MarshJ (2010) Young children’s play in online virtual worlds. Journal of Early Childhood Research8(23): 23–39.
27.
MerchantG (2011) Critical media literacy. In: ChapelleCA (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
28.
New London Group (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review66(1): 60–92.
29.
ReichSMBlackRW (2012) Missed opportunities on Webkinz when developmental abilities are not considered. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology33: 136–145.
30.
VasquezVFeldermanC (2013) Technology and critical literacy in early childhood, New York, NY: Routledge Press.
31.
Washington and Lee University (2010) Student study shows how Barbie affects girls’ ideas of their future capabilities. Washington and Lee University News, 16 May 2010. Available at: http://www.wlu.edu/x48373.xml (accessed 18 October 2012).
32.
WohlwendK (2009) Damsels in discourse: girls consuming and producing identity through Disney princess play. Reading Research Quarterly44(1): 57–83.
