This article reports on a study of literacy practices in a Norwegian preschool where deaf and hearing children are enrolled in the same group and where communication is based on both sign language and spoken language. The aim of the study was to explore pathways to literacy for young deaf children within this setting. Our implicit assumption is that deaf children access literacy in much the same way as hearing children do. In the study we ask what kind of literacy events occur in the preschool and we examine how these events might allow for participation by the young deaf children on equal terms with their hearing peers. The study is conducted within a sociocultural framework. From this perspective, literacy is perceived as a social practice in everyday activities. Within the range of social activities in the preschool, some significant literacy events were analysed with regard to their nature and impact on literacy learning for deaf children. Data are based on video recordings, field notes and interviews with teachers. The results demonstrate that a number of events vital to literacy learning represent great educational challenges in inclusive settings with both hearing and deaf children.
Ahlström M (2000) Hörselskadade barn i kommunikation och samspel. Phd Thesis, University of Stockholm, Sweden.
2.
AndersonLTvingstedtAL (2009) ‘Med fokus på samspel: Att använda video ispecialpedagogisk forskning’. Educare4(9): 81103.
3.
Arnesen K, Enerstvedt RT, Engen EA et al. (2002) En kartlegging av grunnskoleelever og deres språklige situasjon. Skådalen Publication Series No. 16. Oslo: Skådalen Resource Centre.
4.
Bagga-GuptaS (1999) ‘Visual Language Environments: Exploring Everyday Life and Literacies in Swedish Deaf Bilingual Schools’. Visual Anthropology Review15(2): 95120.
5.
Bagga-GuptaS (2002) ‘Explorations in Bilingual Instructional Interaction: A Sociocultural Perspective on Literacy’. Learning and Instruction12(5): 557587.
6.
BartonD (2007) Literacy, Lives and Learning, London: Routledge.
7.
BartonDHamiltonM (1998) Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community, London: Routledge.
8.
BjörklundC (2010) ‘Att fånga komplexiteten i små barns lärande. En metodologisk refleksjon’. Nordic Early Childhood Educational Research3(1): 1726.
9.
Blum-KulkaSSnowCE (2004) ‘Introduction: The Potential of Peer Talk’. Discourse Studies6(3): 291306.
10.
BowenSK (2008) ‘Coenrollment for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Friendship Patterns and Social Interactions’. American Annals of the Deaf153(3): 285293.
11.
DiazCJ (2007) Literacy as Social Practice. In: MakinLDiazCJMcLachlanC (eds) Literacies in Childhood, Australia: Elsevier.
12.
DickinsonDKNeumanSB (2006) Handbook of Early Literacy Research, Vol. 2, New York: Guilford Press.
13.
EarlyDMIrukaIURitchieR (2009) ‘How Do Pre-Kindergarteners Spend their Time? Gender, Ethnicity, and Income as Predictors of Experiences in Pre-Kindergarten Classrooms’. Early Childhood Research Quarterly25(2): 177193.
14.
EasterbrooksSRStephensonB (2006) ‘An Examination of Twenty Literacy, Science, and Mathematics Practices Used to Educate Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing’. American Annals of the Deaf151(4): 385397.
15.
Edwards A and Daniels H (2012) ‘The Knowledge that Matters in Professional Practices’, Journal of Education and Work 25(1): 39–58.
16.
EgbertMDeppermanA (2012) Introduction to Conversation Analysis with Examples from Audiolog. In: EgbertMDeppermanA (eds) Hearing Aids Communication: Integrating Social Interaction, Audiology and User Centered Design to Improve Communication with Hearing Loss and Hearing Technologies, Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
17.
EgbertMMatthewsA (2012) User Centered Design: From Understanding Hearing Loss and Hearing Aids towards Understanding Interaction. In: EgbertMDeppermanA (eds) Hearing Aids Communication: Integrating Social Interaction, Audiology and User Centered Design to Improve Communication with Hearing Loss and Hearing Technologies, Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
18.
GeeJP (2012) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, London: Routledge.
19.
GeersATobeyEMoogJ (2008) ‘Long-Term Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in the Preschool Years: From Elementary Grades to High School’. International Journal of Audiology47(2): 2130.
20.
GibbonsMLimogesCNowotnyH (1994) The New Production of Knowledge, London: SAGE.
21.
GjemsL (2009) Å samtale seg til kunnskap. Sosiokulturelle teorier om barns læring om språk og gjennom språk, Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.
22.
HallNLarsonJMarshJ (2003) Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy, London: SAGE.
23.
Hansen AAL (2005) Kommunikative praksiser i visuelt orienterte klasserom: En studie av tilrettelagt opplegg for døve lærerstudenter. PhD Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
24.
HaugP (2010) ‘Approaches to Empirical Research on Inclusive Education’. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research12(3): 199209.
25.
HeathCHindmarsJLuffP (2010) Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
26.
HeathSB (1983) Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HeathSBStreetBVMillsM (2008) On Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research, New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
HendarO (2012) Elever med hørselshemming i skolen: En kartleggingsundersøkelse om læringsmiljø og læringsutbytte, Oslo: Skådalen Resource Centre.
29.
HjulstadOKristoffersenA-ESimonsenE (2002) Barn med cochleaimplantat. Kommunikative praksiser i barnehagen. Skådalen Publication Series No. 17, Oslo: Skådalen Resource Centre.
30.
HutchbyI (2012) Participation and the Institutional Agenda in Child Counselling. In: BaraldiCIerveseVRossiE (eds) Participation, Facilitation and Mediation: Perspectives on Young Children and Involvement in Social Contexts, New York: Routledge.
31.
HydeM (2009) Inclusion in International Context. In: MooresMMillerM (eds) Deafness around the World: Development, Educational, and Social Issues, Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
32.
HydeMOhnaSEHjulstadO (2005–6) ‘Education of the Deaf in Australia and Norway: A Comparative Study of the Interpretations and Applications of Inclusion’. American Annals of the Deaf150(5): 415426.
33.
HydeMPunchR (2010) ‘Children with Cochlear Implants in Australia: Educational Settings, Supports, and Outcomes’. Journals of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education15(4): 405421.
34.
JewittC (2006) Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach, London: Routledge.
35.
JordanBHHendersonA (1995) ‘Interaction Analysis: Foundation and Practice’. The Journal of the Learning Sciences4(1): 39103.
36.
KeatingEMirusG (2003) ‘Examining Interactions across Language Modalities: Deaf Children and Hearing Peers at School’. Anthropology & Education Quarterly34(2): 115135.
37.
KermitPMjøenOMHolmA (2010) Å vokse opp med cochleaimplantat: Barns språklige samhandling med hørende jevnaldrende og voksen. Sosiologisk tidsskrift3: 249270.
38.
KirkeheiIMyrhaugHTGarmN (2011) Kommunikasjonsformer for barn med cochleaimplantat, Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services.
39.
Knorr-CetinaK (1997) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
40.
KreimeyerKHCrookePDryeC (2000) ‘Academic and Social Benefits of a Co-Enrollment Model of Inclusive Education for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children’. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education5(2): 174185.
KritzerKL (2009) ‘Barely Started and already Left Behind: A Descriptive Analysis of the Mathematics Ability Demonstrated by Young Deaf Children’. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education14(4): 409421.
43.
KushalnagarPMathurGMorelandCJ (2010) ‘Infants and Children with Hearing Loss Need Early Language Access’. Journal of Clinical Ethics21(2): 143154.
44.
LucknerJLSebaldAMCooneyJ (2005) ‘An Examination of the Evidence-Based Literacy Research in Deaf Education’. American Annals of the Deaf150(5): 443456.
45.
McMunnDCMatthewsMV (2009) ‘Emergent Comprehension: Understanding Comprehension Development among Young Literacy Learners’. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy9(3): 269294.
46.
MarscharkMHauserPC (2008) Deaf Cognition: Foundations and Outcomes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
MarscharkMRhotenCFabichM (2007) ‘Effects of Cochlear Implants on Children’s Reading and Academic Achievement’. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education12(3): 269282.
48.
MayerC (2007) ‘What Really Matters in the Early Literacy Development of Deaf Children’. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education12(4): 411431.
49.
Ministry of Education and Research (2006) Framework Plan for the Content and Task of Kindergartens, Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
50.
MossPDahlbergG (2008) ‘Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Languages of Evaluation’. New Zealand Journal of Teacher’s Work5(1): 312.
51.
MusselmanC (2000) ‘How Do Children Who Can’t Hear Learn to Read an Alphabetic Script? A Review of the Literature on Reading and Deafness’. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education5(1): 931.
52.
NAHEI (Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions) (2010) Higher Education and Research and Development Work is Inseparable, Oslo: NAHEI.
53.
NerlandMJensenK (2012) ‘Epistemic Practices and Object Relations in Professional Work’. Journal of Education and Work25(1): 101120.
54.
NESH (2011) The National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities, Oslo: NESH.
55.
NeumanSBDickinsonDK (2001) Handbook of Early Literacy Research, Vol. 1, New York: Guilford Press.
56.
NeumanSBDickinsonDK (2011) Handbook of Early Literacy Research, Vol. 3, New York: Guilford Press.
57.
OhnaSEHjulstadOVonenAM (2003) På vei mot en ny grunnskoleopplæring for døve elever: En evalueringsstudie etter Reform 97. Skådalen Publication Series No. 20, Oslo: Skådalen Resource Centre.
58.
PahlKRowsellJ (2005) Literacy and Education: Understanding the New Literacy Studies in the Classroom, London: SAGE.
59.
PowersS (2011) ‘Learning from Success: High Achieving Deaf Students’. Deafness & Education International13(1): 92109.
60.
PowersSGregorySThoutenhoofdED (1998) The Educational Achievements of Deaf Children. DfEE Research Report RR65, London: Department for Education and Employment.
61.
Preisler G (1983) Deaf Children in Communication. PhD Thesis, Stockholm University, Sweden.
62.
PunchLHydeMB (2010) ‘Children with Cochlear Implants in Australia: ducational Settings, Supports, and Outcomes’. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education15(4): 405421.
63.
Punch L and Hyde MB (2011) ‘Communication, Psychosocial, and Educational Outcomes of Children with Cochlear Implants and Challenges Remaining for Professionals and Parents’, International Journal of Otolaryngology. DOI:10.1155/2011/573280.
64.
Purcell-GatesVJacobsonEDegenerS (2004) Print Literacy Development: Uniting Cognitive and Social Practice Theories, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65.
Purcell-Gates V, Perry K and Brisno A (2011) ‘Analyzing Literacy Practice: Grounded Theory to Model’, Research in the Teaching of English 45, 439–458.
66.
RadfordJMahonM (2010) Multimodal Participation in Storybook Sharing. In: GardnerHForresterM (eds) Analysing Interactions in Childhood: Insights from Conversation Anslysis, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
67.
RickinsonMSebbaJEdwardsA (2011) Improving Research through User Engagement, London: Routledge.
68.
Roos C (2004) Skriftspråkande döva barn: En studie om skriftspråkligt lärande iförskola och tidliga skolår. PhD Thesis, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
69.
Sahlström F (1999) Up the Hill Backwards: On Interactional Constraints and Affordances for Equity: Constitution in the Classrooms of the Swedish Comprehensive School. PhD Thesis, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
70.
SäljöR (2000) Lärande i praktiken: Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv, Stockholm: Prisma.
71.
SilvermanD (2006) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk: Text and Interaction, 3rd edn, London: SAGE.
72.
SimonsenEKristoffersenA-EHjulstadO (2009a) Hva skjer i klasserommet? Rapport fra prosjektet Inkluderende opplæring av barn med cochleaimplantat – en oppfølgingsstudie. Skådalen Publication Series No. 28, Oslo: Skådalen Resource Centre.
73.
SimonsenEKristoffersenA-EHydeMB (2009b) ‘Great Expectations: Perspectives on Cochlear Implantation of Deaf Children in Norway’. American Annals of the Deaf154(3): 263273.
74.
Smeby JC (2003) Profesjonsfag, fagdisipliner og tverrfaglige felt. Arbeidsnotat nr.5/2003. Oslo: Oslo University College, Senter for profesjonsstudier.
75.
SmebyJC (2007) Connecting to Professional Knowledge. Studies of Higher Education32(2): 207224.
76.
SpencerPEMarscharkM (2010) Evidence-Based Practice in Educating Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77.
StinsonMSKluwinTN (2005) Educational Consequences of Alternative School Placements. In: MarscharkMSpencerPE (eds) Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
VermeulenAMKnoorsHSnikA (2007) ‘Reading Comprehension of Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants’. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education12(3): 283302.
81.
WilliamsC (2004) ‘Emergent Literacy of Deaf Children’. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education9(4): 352365.
