This article examines Reading Recovery as a microcosm for issues related to race and access. Tenets of critical race theory are presented to explore how racial biases are systemic in our ways of being, teaching, and conducting research. Specifically, I present data for African American children involved in Reading Recovery in one Midwestern American city and explore contextual factors and policies related to both Reading Recovery and the sociopolitical context in which children live that affect their ability to benefit from the program. The article ends with a set of conclusions related to how well African American children are served by Reading Recovery.
Berliner D. and Biddle B. ( 1995) The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud and the Attack on America’sPublic Schools. New York, NY: Basic Books.
2.
Bueker, CS ( 2004) Narrowing the Divide: A Study of Racial and Gender Achievement Gaps among First Graders in Massachusetts. Unpublished manuscript.
3.
Clay MM ( 2002) An Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4.
Delgado R. ( 1995) Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
5.
Greene JP ( 2002) High School Graduation Rates in the United States (Revised 2002). Davie, FL: Black Alliance for Educational Options and The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
6.
Greene S and Abt-Perkins D (eds) (2003) Making Race Visible: Literacy Research for Cultural Understanding. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
Janks H. ( 2005) ‘Deconstruction and Reconstruction: Diversity as a Productive Resource’. Discourse26(1): 31-43.
8.
Jay M. ( 2003) ‘Critical Race Theory, Multicultural Education, and the Hidden Curriculum of Hegemony’. Multicultural Perspectives: Official Journal of the National Association for Multicultural Education5(4): 3-9.
9.
Jencks C and Phillips M (eds) (1998) The Black-White Test Score Gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
10.
Kozol J. ( 1991) Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s Schools . New York, NY: Crown Publishers .
11.
Ladson-Billings G. ( 2003) ‘It’s your World, I’m Just Trying to Explain It: Understanding our Epistemological and Methodological Challenges’ . Qualitative Inquiry9(1): 5-12.
12.
Ladson-Billings G. and Tate WF ( 1995) ‘Towards a Critical Race Theory of Education’ . Teachers College Record97(1): 47-64.
13.
Leung C., Harris R. and Rampton B. ( 1997) ‘The Idealized Native Speaker, Reified Ethnicities, and Classroom Realities’. TESOL Quarterly31(3): 543-560.
14.
Moll LC, Amanti C., Neff D. and Gonzalez N. ( 1992) ‘Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms’. Theory into Practice31(1): 132-141.
15.
Parker L. and Lynn M. ( 2002) ‘What’s Race Got to Do with It? Critical Race Theory’s Conflicts with and Connections to Qualitative Research Methodology and Epistemology’. Qualitative Inquiry8(1): 7-22.
16.
Rodgers E. and Gómez-Bellengé FX (2003) ‘Closing the Achievement Gap in Ohio with Reading Recovery’. Journal of Reading Recovery3(1): 65-74.
17.
Solórzano DG and Yosso TJ ( 2002) ‘Critical Race Methodology: Counter-Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Educational Research’. Qualitative Inquiry8: 23-44.
18.
Stein P. ( 1998) ‘Reconfiguring the Past and the Present: Performing Literacy Histories in a Johannesburg Classroom’. TESOL Quarterly32: 517-528.
19.
Tatum BD ( 1992) Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? And other Conversations about Race: A Psychologist Explains the Development of Racial Identity. New York, NY: Basic Books.
20.
Willis AI ( 2008) Reading Comprehension Research and Testing in the US. Undercurrents of Race, Class, and Power in the Struggle for Meaning. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
