The article describes and discusses the learning potential of unofficial techno-literacy activities in the classroom with regards to Swedish 7—8-year-olds’ exploration of semiotic resources when interacting with computers. In classroom contexts where every child works with his or her own computer, such activities tend to take up a substantial amount of time. The children have access to a wide range of sites and programs and show an interest in discovering these resources. The article thus explores a previously often neglected site for learning, located in the official classroom context but involving self-chosen activities with contemporary technology. In terms of theory and methodology, social semiotic ethnography is introduced into the field of young children’s techno-literacies. It is illustrated how a social semiotic approach allows for a more detailed analysis of the semiotic resources, whereas ethnographic data are necessary for an understanding of how such resources are put to use.
Aarseth E. ( 2000) Alegories of space: The question of spatiality in computer games. In: Eskelinen M and Koskimaa R (eds.) Cybertext Yearbook, University of Jyväskylä. Available at: http://cybertext.hum.jyu.fi/articles/129.pdf.
2.
Barton D. ( 2006) The significance of a social practice view of language, literacy and numeracy. In: Tett L, Hamilton M and Hillier Y (eds) Adult Literacy, Numeracy and Language: Policy, Practices and Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 21-30.
3.
Barton D. and Hamilton M. ( 1998) Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community . London: Routledge.
4.
Bearne E.(2009) Multimodality, literacy and texts: Developing a discourse. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy9(2): 156-187.
5.
Csikszentmihalyi M. ( 1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
6.
Dunkels E. ( 2007) Bridging the Distance: Children’s Strategies on the Internet. Umeå: Print and Media.
7.
Dyson AH ( 1997) Writing Superheroes: Contemporary Childhood, Popular Culture, and Classroom Literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
Dyson AH ( 2001) Where are the childhoods in childhood literacy?: An exploration in outer (school) space. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy1(1): 9-39.
9.
Dyson AH ( 2003) The Brothers and Sisters Learn to Write: Popular Literacies in Childhood and School Culture. New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
Gee JP ( 2003) What Video Games have to Teach us about Learning and Literacy . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
Gee JP ( 2005a) Why Video Games are Good for your Soul: Pleasure and Learning. Altona, Victoria: Common Ground Publishing.
12.
Gee JP ( 2005b) Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines . E-Learning2(1): 5-16.
13.
Gibson J. ( 1977) The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R and Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 67-82.
14.
Gibson J. ( 1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
15.
Gilmore P. ( 1983) Spelling ‘‘Mississippi’’: Recontextualizing a literacy-related speech event. Anthropology and Education Quarterly14(4): 235-255.
16.
Goetz JP and LeCompte MD ( 1984) Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research . Orlando: Academic Press .
17.
Halliday MAK and Matthiessen C. ( 2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
18.
Jewitt C. ( 2006) Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach . London: Routledge.
19.
Kress G. ( 1997) Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy . London: Routledge.
20.
Kress G. ( 2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. London : Routledge.
21.
Kress G. ( 2005) Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning . Computers and Composition22(1): 5-22.
22.
Kress G and Jewitt C (eds) (2003) Multimodal Literacy. New York: Lang.
23.
Kress G. and Van Leeuwen T. ( 2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London and New York: Routledge .
24.
Linderoth J., Lantz-Andersson A. and Lindström B. ( 2002) Electronic exaggeration and virtual worries: Mapping research of computer games relevant to the understanding of children’s game play . Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood3(2): 226-250.
25.
Marsh J. ( 2005) Introduction: Children of the digital age. In: Marsh J (ed.) Popular Culture, New Media and Digital Literacy in Early Childhood. London : Routledge, 1-10.
26.
Marsh J. and Millard E. ( 2000) Literacy and Popular Culture: Using Children’s Culture in the Classroom. London: Paul Chapman .
27.
Maybin J. ( 2007) Literacy under and over the desk: Oppositions and heterogeneity . Language and Education21(6): 515-530.
28.
O’Toole M. ( 1994) The Language of Displayed Art. London : Leicester University Press.
29.
Pillay H. ( 2003) An investigation of cognitive processes engaged in by recreational computer game players: Implications for skills of the future . Journal of Research on Technology in Education34(3): 336-350.
30.
Rampton B. ( 2006) Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Van Leeuwen T. ( 2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. London : Routledge.
32.
Vannini P. ( 2007) Social semiotics and fieldwork: Method and analytics . Qualitative Inquiry13(1): 113-140.
33.
Wolcott HF ( 2008) Ethnography: A Way of Seeing. Lanham, MD: Altamira.
