The concept of the ‘new communication landscape’ (Kress, 1998) is propelling a re-examination of what is meant by literacy, and the ways in which we seek to identify and promote literacy practices in young children.This article reviews theoretical moves to destabilize the dichotomy between oracy and literacy. Challenges posed by an examination of new technologies are set against those that draw on evidence from diverse cultural and historical contexts.The telephone presents a contemporary context that has been largely overlooked in child language research – yet this medium possesses its own specific constraints and opportunities for discourse, necessitating a shift away from the ‘here-and-now’ characteristic of very young children’s talk, to a consideration of the interlocutor’s distance characteristic of literacy. An analysis of the practices of three- and four-year-old children’s spontaneous telephone play demonstrates many ways in which their oral practices in this communication channel may be conceptualiz21ed within an understanding of their symbolic meaningmaking practices that is related to literacy, rather than a separate domain of activity. Finally, it is proposed that Bakhtin’s notion of ‘speech genre’ provides a particularly useful characterization of this important aspect of language development in the context of communication technology.
Akinnaso, F.N.
(1982) ‘The Literate Writes and The Nonliterate Chants: Written Language and Ritual Communication in Sociolinguistic Perspective’, in W. Frawley (ed.) Linguistics and Literacy, pp. 7–36. New York: Plenum.
2.
Andersen, E.S.
(1990) Speaking with Style: The Sociolinguistic Skills of Children. London: Routledge.
3.
Anning, A.
and Edwards, A. (1999) Promoting Children’s Learning from Birth to Five: Developing the New EarlyYears Professional. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4.
Bakhtin, M.
(1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
Baron, N.
(1998) ‘Letters by Phone or Speech by Other Means: the Linguistics of Email’, Language and Communication18: 133–170.
6.
Barton, D.
(1995) Literacy:An Introduction to the Ecology ofWritten Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
7.
Bascom, W.
(1969) Ifa Divination: Communication Between Gods and Men in West Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8.
Bascom, W.
(1980) Sixteen Cowries:Yoruba Divination from Africa to the New World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
Bordeaux, M.A.
and Willbrand, M.L. (1987) ‘Pragmatic Development in Children’s Telephone Discourse’, Discourse Processes10(3): 253–266.
10.
Brown, R.
and Bellugi, U. (1964) ‘Three Processes in the Child’s Acquisition of Syntax’, Harvard Educational Review34: 133–151.
11.
Cameron, C.A.
(1998) ‘Telephone Communication Enhances Recontextualized Language’, paper presented in Symposium ‘The Emergence of Academic Skills: On the Importance of Home Experiences’ to Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 3–7 June.
12.
Cameron, C.A.
and Lee, K. (1997) ‘The Development of Children’s Telephone Communication’, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology18: 55–70.
13.
Cameron, C.A.
, and Wang, M. (1999). ‘Frog, Where are You? Children’s Narrative Expression Over the Telephone’, Discourse Processes28(3): 217–236.
14.
Carver, R.
(2000) ‘How will Literacy be Defined in the New Millenium?’, Reading Research Quarterly35(1): 67–68.
15.
Chafe, W.
and Tannen, D. (1987) ‘The Relation Between Written and Spoken Language’, Annual Review of Anthropology16: 383–407.
16.
Cole, M.
(1996) Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
17.
Cook, G.
(2000) Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Fein, G.G.
(1981) ‘Pretend Play in Childhood: An Integrative Review’, Child Development52: 1095–1118.
19.
Ferguson, C.A.
and Macken, M.A. (1983) ‘The Role of Play in Phonological Development’, in K.E. Nelson (ed.) Children’s Language Vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Finnegan, R.
(1973) ‘Literacy Versus Nonliteracy:The Great Divide?’, in R. Horton and R. Finnegan (eds) Modes of Thought: Essays on Thinking in Western and Non-Western Societies, pp. 112–144. London: Faber and Faber.
21.
Gee, J.P.
(1996) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, 2nd edn.London: Taylor and Francis.
22.
Gillen, J. (1998) ‘An Investigation into Young Children’s Telephone Discourse’, PhD thesis, Didsbury School of Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.
23.
Gillen, J.
(2000a) ‘Recontextualization:The Shaping of Telephone Discourse in Play By Three- and Four-Year-Olds’, Language and Education14(4): 250–265.
24.
Gillen, J.
(2000b) ‘“It’s Not Really Time for Going Home”, Three- and Four-year-old Children Learning to Talk on the Telephone’, in M. Coulthard, J. Cotterill and F. Rock (eds) Working with Dialogue: Selected Papers from the 7th IADA Conference, Birmingham 1999, pp. 226–240. Tubingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer.
25.
Gillen, J.
(2000c) ‘Listening to Young Children Talking on the Telephone: a Reassessment of Vygotsky’s Notion of “egocentric speech”’, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood1(2): 171–184.
26.
Gillen, J.
(2000d) ‘The Acquisition of Speech Genres:A Study ofYoung Children Talking on the Telephone in Pretence and Dialogic Modes’, paper presented to Sociolinguistic Symposium, University of the West of England, 27–29 April.
27.
Gillen, J.
(2001) ‘“Is that the Little Pig?”– Using Toy Telephones in the Early Years Classroom’, in P. Goodwin (ed.) The Articulate Classroom, pp. 93–99. London: David Fulton.
28.
Gillen, J.
(2002) ‘Engaged from Birth: Children Under Two Talking on Telephones’, in A. Schorr, B. Campbell and M. Schenk (eds) Communication Research in Europe and Abroad: Challenges of the First Decade. Berlin: DeGruyter.
29.
Gillen, J.
and Hall, N. (2001) ‘“Hiya, Mum!” An Analysis of Pretence Telephone Play in a Nursery Setting’, Early Years, 21(1): 15–24.
30.
Goodman, Y.
(1980) ‘The Roots of Literacy’, in M.P. Douglass (ed.) Reading: A Humanising Experience, pp. 1–32. Claremont: Claremont Graduate School.
31.
Goody, J.
(1987) The Interface Between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Goswami, U.C.
(1999) ‘Causal Connections in Beginning Reading: The Importance of Rhyme’, Journal of Research in Reading22: 217–240.
33.
Graff, H.J.
(1979) The Literacy Myth: Literacy and Social Structure in the Nineteenth-century City. New York: Academic Press.
34.
Hall, N.
(1987) The Emergence of Literacy. Sevenoaks: Hodder and Stoughton.
35.
Hall, N.
, Gillen, J. and Greenall, R. (1996) ‘“Don’t Cry, I Ring the Cop Shop”: Young Children’s Pretend Telephone Behaviours’, in N. Hall and J. Martello (eds) Listening to Children Think: Exploring Talk in the Early Years, pp. 34–53. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
36.
Haworth, A.
(2001) ‘The Re-positioning of Oracy: A Millenium Project?’, Cambridge Journal of Education31(1): 11–23.
37.
HighScope Education Research Foundation
(1986) Introduction to the HighScope Pre-School Curriculum.Ypsilanti, MI: High Scope.
38.
Hopper, R.
(1992) Telephone Conversation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
39.
Holmes, J.
(1981) ‘Hello-goodbye: An Analysis of Children’sTelephone Conversations’, Semiotica37(1–2): 91–107.
40.
Horowitz, R.
and Samuels, S.J. (1987) ‘Comprehending Oral and Written Language’, in R. Horowitz and S.J. Samuels (eds) Comprehending Oral andWritten Language, pp. 1–52. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41.
Hymes, D.
(1996) Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality, Towards an Understanding of Voice. London: Taylor and Francis.
42.
Hutchison, J. (2001) ‘Telephone Communications Enhance Children’s Narratives’, PhD thesis, University of New Brunswick, Canada.
43.
Kress, G.
(1998) ‘Visual and Verbal Modes of Representation in Electronically Mediated Communication: The Potentials of New Forms of Texts’, in I. Snyder (ed.) Page to Screen:Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era. London: Routledge.
44.
Lancy, D.
, ed. (1994) Children’s Emergent Literacy: From Research to Practice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
45.
Lankshear, C.
and Knobel, M. (1997) ‘Literacies, Texts and Difference in the Electronic Age’, in Colin Lankshear with J.P. Gee, M. Knobel and C. Searle (eds) Changing Literacies, pp. 133–163. Buckingham: Open University Press.
46.
Lazo, M.G.
and Pumfrey, P.D. (1996) ‘Early Predictors of Later Attainment in Reading and Spelling’, Reading30(3): 5–11.
47.
Lemke, J.L.
(1998) ‘Multimedia Literacy Demands of the Scientific Curriculum’, Linguistics and Education10(3): 247–271.
48.
Many, J.
(2000) ‘How Will Literacy be Defined in the New Millenium?’, Reading Research Quarterly35(1): 65–67.
49.
Meek, M.
(1991) On Being Literate. London: Bodley Head.
50.
Mignolo, W.D.
(1994) ‘Literacy and the Colonization of Memory: Writing Histories of People Without History’, in D. Keller-Cohen (ed.) Literacy – Interdisciplinary Conversations, pp. 91–114. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
51.
Mininni, G.
(1985) ‘The Ontogenesis of Telephone Interaction’, Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata17(2–3): 187–197.
52.
Olson, D.
(1994) The World on Paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Ong, W.
(1982) Orality and Literacy:The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen/Routledge.
54.
Rutter, D.
(1989) ‘The Role of Cuelessness in Social Interaction’, in D. Roger and P. Bull (ed.) Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
55.
Sacks, H.
, Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974) ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-taking for Conversation’, Language50: 696–735.
56.
Schegloff, E.
(1968) ‘Sequencing in Conversational Openings’, American Anthropologist70(6): 1075–1095.
57.
Schegloff, E.
(1979) ‘Identification and Recognition in Telephone Conversation Openings’, in G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language, pp. 23–78. New York: Irvington.
58.
Schegloff, E.
and Sacks, H. (1973) ‘Opening up Closings’, Semiotica7: 289–327.
59.
Scribner, S.
and Cole, M. (1981) The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
Snow, C.
(1983) ‘Literacy and Language: Relationships During the Preschool Years’, Harvard Educational Review53: 165–189.
61.
Snow, C.
(1991) ‘The Theoretical Basis For Relationships Between Language and Literacy Development’, Journal of Research in Childhood Education6: 5–10.
62.
Standage, T.
(1998) The Victorian Internet:The Remarkable Story of the Telegraph and the Nineteenth Century’s Online Pioneers. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
63.
Street, B.
(1984) Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Teale, W.H.
and Sulzby, E., eds (1986) Emergent Literacy: Writing and Reading. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
65.
Trevarthen, C.
(1995) ‘The Child’s Need to Learn a Culture’, Children and Society9(1): 5–19.
66.
Veach, S.R. (1981) ‘Children’sTelephone Conversations’, PhD thesis, Stanford University, USA.
67.
Vygotsky, L.S.
(1967) ‘Play and Its Role in the Mental Development of the Child’, Soviet Psychology5: 6–18.
68.
Vygotsky, L.S.
(1987) ‘Thinking and Speech’, in Rieber, R. and Carton, A. (eds) The Collected Works of L.S.Vygotsky. Vol. I: Problems of General Psychology, including the volume Thinking and Speech, pp. 39–285, trans. N. Minick. New York: Plenum.
69.
Warren, A.
and Tate, C. (1992) ‘Egocentrism in Children’s Telephone Conversations’, in Diaz, R. and Berk, L. (eds) Private Speech:From Social Interaction to Self-Regulation, pp. 245–264. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70.
Werry, C.
(1996) ‘Linguistic and Interactional Features of Internet Relay Chat’, in S. Herring (ed.) Computer-Mediated Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
