Including the interests of those migrants leave behind in debates about migration and justice is a strategy which theorists who are sceptical of open borders have made use of, most notably in brain drain critiques of emigration. In rejecting this view, and in invoking an epistemic conception of liberalism, I claim that not only can the interests of those left behind be appealed to by defenders of more open borders. For at least two reasons such interests should be included. First, more open borders have a unique role to play in addressing the interests of those left behind via the transformative economic effects of remittances and the state signalling mechanism that migrant and remittance flows provide, both for wealthier states as they dispense foreign aid and for poorer states as they implement national development programmes. Second, more open borders are also compelling for those who are sceptical of immigration insofar as they help them identify the obligations of justice they may owe to the world’s poor and how these are best discharged; obligations whose fulfilment lessens the pressure to migrate from poorer to wealthier states over the long term.
AbidazehA (2016) The special-obligations challenge to more open borders. In: FineSYpiL (eds) Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 105–124.
2.
AxelrodRCohenMD (2000) Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier.
New York:
Basic Books.
3.
BaderV (1997) Fairly open borders. In: BaderV (ed) Citizenship and Exclusion.
Basingstoke:
Macmillan, pp. 28–62.
4.
BarryC (2011)
Immigration and global justice. Global Justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric4: 30–38.
5.
BauböckR (2009)
Global justice, freedom of movement and democratic citizenship. European Journal of Sociology50(1): 1–31.
6.
Blake M (2013) Immigration, jurisdiction, and exclusion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 41(2): 103–130.
7.
BlakeM (2016a)
Ethics, politics and emigration. Law, Ethics and Philosophy4: 146–160.
8.
BlakeM (2016b)
Positive and negative rights of migration: A reply to my critics. Ethics and Global Politics9(1). DOI: 10.3402/egp.v9.33553.
9.
BlakeM (2017)
In defence of departure: Justice and the right to leave. South African Journal of Philosophy26(1): 168–176.
10.
BlockW (1998)
A libertarian case for free immigration. Journal of Libertarian Studies13(2): 167–186.
11.
BrockG (2009a) Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
12.
BrockG (2009b) Health in developing countries and our global responsibilities. In: DawsonA (ed) The Philosophy of Public Health.
Farnham:
Ashgate, pp. 73–83.
13.
BrockGBlakeM (2015) Debating Brain Drain: May Governments Restrict Emigration?
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
14.
BrockG (2016a)
Responsibilities in an unjust world: A reply to Carens, Kollar, Oberman and Rapoport. Law, Ethics and Philosophy4: 161–182.
15.
BrockG (2016b)
How should poor developing states blend concern for citizens’ needs, liberties, rights, and interests? A defense of some policy proposals. Ethics and Global Politics9(1). DOI: 10.3402/egp.v9.33504.
16.
BrockG (2017)
Just responses to problems associated with the brain drain: Identity, community and obligation in an unjust world. South African Journal of Philosophy36(1): 156–167.
17.
CarensJ (1987)
Aliens and citizens: The case for open borders.The Review of Politics49(2): 251–273.
18.
CarensJ (1992) Migration and morality: A liberal egalitarian perspective. In: BarryBGoodinRE (eds) Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and Money.
University Park:
University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 25–47.
19.
CarensJ (2009) Fear vs. fairness: Migration, citizenship and the transformation of political Community. In: Lippert-RasmussenKHoltugNLægaardS (eds) Nationalism and Multiculturalism in a World of Immigration.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 151–173.
20.
CarensJ (2013) The Ethics of Immigration.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
21.
CarensJ (2016)
Explaining the brain drain debate. Law, Ethics and Philosophy4: 132–145.
22.
de HaasH (2007) Remittances, Migration and Social Development: A Conceptual Review of the Literature. Social Policy and Development, Programme Paper Number 34. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
23.
EasterlyWNyarkoY (2008) “Is the brain drain good for Africa?” Global Economy and Development. Working Paper 19, Brookings Institute, Washington, DC.
24.
Easterly W (2007) The white man’s burden: why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Press.
25.
EngelsF (1959) Socialism: Utopian and scientific. In: FeuerLS (ed) Marx and Engels: Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy.
Garden City:
Doubleday.
26.
Carter J and Robinson M (eds.) (2004) Global Corruption Report 2004 London: Pluto Press.
27.
FineS (2016) Immigration and discrimination. In: FineSYpiL (eds) Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 125–150.
28.
FinlayS (2014) Predictive Analytics, Data Mining and Big Data: Myths, Misconceptions and Methods.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave MacMillan.
29.
HayekFA (1948) The use of knowledge in society. In: HayekFA (ed) Individualism and Economic Order.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, pp. 77–91.
30.
HayekFA (1967) The theory of complex phenomena. In: HayekFA (ed) Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics.
London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 22–42.
31.
HigginsP (2008)
Open borders and the right to immigration. Human Rights Review9: 525–535.
32.
HirschmanAOBirdRM (1968) Foreign aid: a critique and a proposal. NJ: Princeton University Press, Essays in International Finance 69: 3–25.
33.
KukathasC (2005) The case for open immigration. In: CohenAIWellmanCH (eds) Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics.
Oxford:
Blackwell, pp. 207–220.
34.
LenardPT (2015)
The ethics of deportation in liberal democratic states. European Journal of Political Theory14(4): 464–480.
35.
MartinPL (1994) Migration and Trade: Challenges for the 1990s. World Bank Development Committee.
Washington DC:
World Bank.
36.
MarxK (1974) Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production.
vol. I.
Moscow:
Progress and London: Lawrence and Wishart.
37.
MillerD (1995) On Nationality.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
38.
MillerD (2005) Immigration: The case for limits. In: CohenAIWellmanCH (eds) Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics.
Oxford:
Blackwell, pp. 193–206.
39.
MillerD (2007) National Responsibility and Global Justice.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
40.
MillerD (2016a) Strangers in Our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
41.
MillerD (2016b) Is there a human right to immigrate? In: FineSYpiL (eds) Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 11–31.
42.
ObermanK (2013)
Can brain drain justify immigration restrictions?.Ethics123(3): 427–455.
43.
ObermanK (2015)
Poverty and immigration policy. American Political Science Review109(2): 239–251.
44.
ObermanK (2016a) Immigration as a human right. In: FineSYpiL (eds) Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 32–56.
45.
ObermanK (2016b)
Emigration in a time of cholera: Freedom, brain drain and human rights. Law, Ethics and Philosophy4: 87–108.
46.
PoggeT (1997) Migration and poverty. In: BaderV (ed) Citizenship and Exclusion.
Basingstoke:
Macmillan, pp. 12–27.
47.
PowellB (ed) (2015) The Economics of Immigration: Market-Based Approaches, Social Science, and Public Policy.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
48.
RapoportH (2016)
Who’s afraid of the brain drain: A development economist’s view. Law, Ethics and Philosophy4: 119–113.
49.
Ratha D, De S, Kim EJ, et al. (2019) Migration and Development Brief 31. Migration and remittances: recent developments and outlook. New York: World Bank Group.
50.
RathaDSanketMXuZ (2008) Outlook for Remittance Flows 2008-2010, Migration and Development Brief No. 8.
Washington DC:
World Bank Publications.
51.
SangiovanniA (2007)
Global justice, reciprocity and the state. Philosophy and Public Affairs35(1): 3–39.
52.
StilzA (2016) Is there an unqualified right to leave? In: FineSYpiL (eds) Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 57–79.
53.
TebbleAJ (2006)
Exclusion for democracy. Political Theory34(4): 463–487.
54.
TebbleAJ (2016) Epistemic Liberalism: A Defence.
London:
Routledge.
55.
TebbleAJ (2019) More open borders and deep structural transformation. Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy. DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2019.1565566.
56.
Vargas-SilvaCRuizI (2008)
Are remittances manna from heaven? A look at the business cycle properties of remittances. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance19(3): 290–303.
57.
WellmanCH (2008)
Immigration and freedom of association. Ethics119: 109–141.
58.
WellmanCHColeP (eds) (2011) Debating the Ethics of Immigration: Is There a Right to Exclude?
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
59.
WellmanCH (2016) Freedom of movement and the rights to enter and exit. In: FineSYpiL (eds) Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 80–101.
60.
YpiL (2008)
Justice in migration: A less open borders utopia?.Journal of Political Philosophy16(4): 391–418.
