Debates over religious accommodation in liberal-democratic states are common. I offer a framework for making sense of their often-abrupt eruption, unpredictable dynamics and variation across jurisdictions, arguing that they are best understood as instances of competitive group boundary construction and maintenance. Religious believers’ interest in honouring their group’s customs is not only based on individual devotion but also reflects their interest in maintaining a sense of coherent religious group identity. Liberal-democratic societies simultaneously create liberal-democratic subjects, through public schooling and other means, including immigrant integration policies. These parallel processes of group formation can intersect, sparking conflict. I outline the social mechanisms that generate conflict, illustrating my argument through reference to the debate over ritual male circumcision in Germany.
Al Arabiya News (2012) Debate over circumcision ruling rages in Germany, July 13.
2.
AlbaR (2005)
Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies28(1): 20–49.
Fateh-MoghadamB (2012)
Criminalizing male circumcision? Case note: Landgericht Cologne, Judgement of 7 May 2012 – No. 151 Ns 169/11. German Law Journal13(9): 1132–1133.
Germann M and Clemens W (2015) The circumcision debate from a German constitutional perspective. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 4(3): 442--468.
19.
GoodmanSW (2012)
Fortifying citizenship: Policy strategies for civic integration in Western Europe. World Politics64(4): 659–698.
20.
GoodmanSW (2014) Immigration and Membership Politics in Western Europe.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
21.
Günzel A (2013) Nationalization of religious parental education? The German circumcision case. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 2(1): 206--209.
22.
HalikiopoulouD (2018)
A right-wing populist momentum? A review of 2017 elections across Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies56(S1): 63–73.
23.
HalikiopoulouDMockSVasilopoulouS (2013)
The civic Zeitgeist: Nationalism and liberal values in the European radical right. Nations and Nationalism19(1): 107–127.
Heimbach-SteinsM (2013) Religious freedom and the German circumcision debate. EUI working Papers, RCAS 2013/18.
26.
InglehartRWelzelC (2012) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
27.
Jensen, Kristian K, Stephen JL and Per M (2019) Introduction: Theorizing the civic turn in European integration policies. Ethnicities 19(4). DOI: 10.1177/146879689843532.
28.
JoppkeC (2007)
Transformation of immigrant integration: Civic integration and antidiscrimination in the Netherlands, France, and Germany. World Politics59(2): 243–273.
29.
JoppkeC (2017)
Civic integration in Western Europe: Three debates. West European Politics40(6): 1153–1176.
30.
JuddR (2007) Contested Rituals: Circumcision, Kosher Butchering and Jewish Political Life in Germany, 1843–1933.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
31.
KortewegATriadafilopoulosT (2015)
Is multiculturalism dead? Groups, governments and the “real work of integration”. Ethnic and Racial Studies38(5): 663–680.
32.
MargalitA (1996) The Decent Society. Trans. Naomi Goldblum.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
MerkelRPutzkeH (2013)
After Cologne: Male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?Journal of Medical Ethics39: 444–449.
36.
MichaelsR (2018)
Banning burqas: The perspective of postsecular comparative law. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law28: 213–245.
37.
MillerD (2008)
Immigrants, nations, and citizenship. The Journal of Political Philosophy16(4): 376.
38.
MouritsenP (2013)
The resilience of citizenship traditions: Civic integration in Germany, Great Britain and Denmark. Ethnicities13(1): 86–109.
39.
OkinSM (1998)
Feminism and multiculturalism: Some tensions. Ethics108(4): 680.
Spinner-HalevJ (2000) Surviving Diversity: Religion and Democratic Citizenship.
Baltimore/London:
The Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
SpinnerJ (1994) The Boundaries of Citizenship: Race, Ethnicity, and Nationality in the Liberal State.
Baltimore/London:
The Johns Hopkins University Press.
47.
TebbleA (2006)
Exclusion for democracy. Political Theory34(4): 463–487.
48.
TillyC (2004)
Social boundary mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34(2): 222.
49.
TriadafilopoulosTRahmannJ (2016) Making room for Islam in Germany’s public schools: The role of the Länder. In: Schroeder N and Hunger U (eds) Staat Und Islam – Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
50.
VarshneyA (2003)
Nationalism, ethnic conflict, and rationality. Perspective on Politics1(1): 85–99.
51.
WeberM (1978) Ethnic groups. In: Roth G and Wittich C (eds) Economy and Society, Vol. I. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
WimmerA (2008a)
The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: A multilevel process theory. American Journal Sociology113(4): 990–992.
54.
WimmerA (2008b)
Elementary strategies of ethnic boundary making. Ethnic and Racial Studies31(6): 1025–1055.
55.
YoungSPTriadafilopoulosT (2013)
Multiculturalism as a deliberative ethic. Public Reason5(1): 49–68.
56.
YurdakulG (2016)
Jews, Muslims and the ritual male circumcision debate: Religious diversity and social inclusion in Germany. Social Inclusion4(2): 77–86.
57.
ZimmerO (2003)
Boundary mechanisms and symbolic resources: Towards a process-oriented approach to national identity. Nations and Nationalism9(2): 173–193.
58.
ZingaD (2008)
Ontario’s challenge: Denominational rights in public education. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy80: 1–44.
59.
ZolbergARWoonLL (1999)
Why Islam is like Spanish: Cultural incorporation in Europe and the United States. Politics and Society27(1): 5–38.
