This paper investigates parents’ involvement in multi-ethnic and class-differentiated urban public schools in Bergen, Norway. It examines how some parents deal with diversity and social inequality in a socially mixed urban area in Norway and Europe today. With the help of the concept of conviviality—the capacity to live together peacefully while negotiating tensions—we focus on the hope of inclusion when people are sharing a place that is important to them in everyday life. Existing research shows how parents engaged in schools are concerned with ensuring the academic success of the school thereby reproducing classed privileges. We find that parents engaged in public bodies in schools act on hopes of social inclusion of the diversity of children and their parents more than they pursue academic success. We argue that, rather than aiming at reproducing classed privileges, some parents aim for a politics of inclusion, leveling out social differences. Using the concept of conviviality, we explore how this has, simultaneously, both inclusionary and exclusionary consequences.
AarsethH (2017)
Fear of falling – fear of fading: The emotional dynamics of positional and personalised individualism. Sociology52(5): 1–16.
2.
AkselvollMØ (2016) Folkeskole, forældre, forskelle. Skole-hjem samarbejde og foreldreinvolvering i et klasseperspektiv. PhD, Roskilde University, Denmark.
3.
AminA (2002)
Ethnicity and the multicultural city. Living with diversity. Environment and Planning A34(6): 959–980.
4.
AminA (2012) Land of Strangers.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
5.
Antony-NewmanM (2018) Parental involvement of immigrant parents. A meta-synthesis. Educational review. DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2017.1423278.
6.
BachD (2014)
Parenting among wealthy Danish families: A concerted civilizing process. Ethnography and Education9(2): 224–237.
7.
BæckUD (2015)
Beyond the fancy cakes. Teachers’ relationship to home-school cooperation in a study from Norway. International Journal about Parents in Education9(1): 37–46.
8.
BæckU-DK (2017)
It is the air that we breathe. Academic socialization as a key component for understanding how parents influence children’s schooling. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy3(2): 123–132.
9.
BalibarEWallersteinI (1988) Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities.
London:
Verso Press,
1991, p. vii232.
10.
BendixsenSBringslidM and VikeH (2017) Egalitarianism in Scandinavia: Historical and Contemporary Approaches.
London:
Palgrave.
11.
BendixsenSDanielsenH (2018) Other people’s children. Inclusive parenting in a diverse neighborhood. Ethnic and Racial Studies. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2018.1478111.
12.
BillinghamCKimelbergS (2013)
Middle-class parents, urban schooling, and the shift from consumption to production of urban space. Sociological Forum28(1): 85–108.
13.
BlommaertJVerschuerenJ (1998) Debating Diversity: Analyzing the Discourse of Tolerance. London:
Taylor & Francis.
14.
BotermanWR (2013)
Dealing with diversity: Middle-class family households and the issue of ‘black’and ‘white’ schools in Amsterdam. Urban Studies50(6): 1130–1147.
15.
BrochmannGGr⊘demAS (2013) Migration and welfare sustainability: The case of Norway. In: BrochmannGJuradoE (eds) Europe’s Immigration Challenge: Reconciling Work, Welfare and Mobility:
Policy Network. London, New York: I. B. Tauris, pp. 59–76.
16.
CucchiaraM (2013)
“Are we doing damage?” Choosing an urban public school in an era of parental anxiety. Anthropology and Education Quarterly44(1): 75–93.
17.
CucchiaraMHorvatE (2014)
Choosing selves: The salience of parental identity in the school choice process. Journal of Education Policy29(4): 486–509.
18.
CrozierGDaviesJ (2007)
Hard to reach parents or hard to reach schools? A discussion of home-school relations, with particular reference to Bangladeshi and Pakistani parents. British Educational Research Journal33(3): 295–313.
19.
DanielsenH (2010)
Diversity and the concept of place. Inclusion and exclusion mechanism among Norwegian City-dwelling parents. Ethnologia Scandinavica. A Journal for Nordic Ethnology40(1):68–82.
20.
EimhjellenISteen-JohnsenKFolkestadB, et al. (2018) Changing patterns of voluntering and participation. In: EnjolrasBStrømsnesK (eds) Scandinavian Civil Society and Transformations. The Case of Norway.
London:
Springer, pp. 25–67.
21.
GilroyP (2004) After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture?
London:
Taylor and Francis.
22.
GullestadM (2006) Plausible Prejudice. Everyday Experiences and Social Images of Nation, Culture and Race.
Oslo:
Universitetsforlaget.
23.
HelgøyIHommeA (2017)
Increasing parental participation at school level: A ‘citizen to serve’ or a ‘customer to steer’?Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy3(2): 144–154.
24.
HollowaySPimlott-WilsonH (2014) “
Any advice is welcome isn’t it?”: Neoliberal parenting education, local mothering cultures, and social class. Environment and Planning A46(1): 94–111.
25.
KimelbergSM (2014)
Beyond test scores: Middle-class mothers, cultural capital, and the evaluation of urban public schools. Sociological Perspectives57(2): 208–228.
26.
LareauA (2006) Unequal Childhoods – Class, Race and Family Life.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
27.
LeesL (2008)
Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance. Urban Studies45(12): 2449–2470.
28.
Posey-MaddoxL (2014) When Middle-Class Parents Choose Urban Schools.
Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press.
29.
Posey-MaddoxLKimelbergSMCucchiaraM (2016)
Seeking a critical mass: middle-class parents’ collective engagement in city public schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education37(7): 905–927.
30.
RaveaudMFvan ZantenA (2007)
Choosing the local school: Middle class parents’ values and social and ethnic mix in London and Paris. Journal of Education Policy22(1): 107–124.
31.
ReayD (2007a)
A darker shade of pale. Whiteness, the middle-classes and multi-ethnic inner city schooling. Sociology41(6): 1041–1060.
32.
ReayD (2007b) ‘
Uruly places’: Inner-city comprehensives, middle-class imaginaries and working class children. Urban Studies44(7): 1191–1201.
33.
ReayDCrozierGJamesD (2011) White Middle Class Identities and Urban Schooling.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
StefansenKAarsethH (2011)
Enriching intimacy: The role of the emotional in the ‘resourcing’ of middle-class children. British Journal of Sociology of Education32(3): 389–405.
35.
VertovecS (2009)
Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies (30): 1024–1054.
36.
VincentC (2017)
The children have only got one education and you have to make sure it’s a good one: Parenting and parent–school relations in a neoliberal age. Gender and Education29(5): 541–557.
37.
VincentCBallSJ (2007)
Making up the middle-class child: Families, activities and class dispositions. Sociology41(6): 1061–1077.
38.
VincentCNealSIqbalH (2016)
Encounters with diversity: Children’s friendships and parental responses. Urban Studies54(8): 1–16.
39.
VolleberghA (2016)
The other neighbor paradox: Fantasies and frustrations of ‘living together’ in Antwerp. Patterns of Prejudice50(2): 129–149.
40.
WessendorfS (2013)
Commonplace diversity and the èthos of mixing: Perceptions of difference in a London neighbourhood. Identities20(4): 407–422.
41.
WessendorfS (2014)
Being open but sometimes closed. Conviviality in a super-diverse London neighborhood. European Journal of Cultural Studies17(4): 392–405.
42.
WessendorfS (2016)
Settling in a super-diverse context: Recent migrants` experiences of conviviality. Journal of Intercultural Studies37(5): 449–463.
43.
WilsonH (2013)
Multicultural learning: Parent encounters with difference in a Birmingham primary school. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers39(1): 102–114.
44.
WilsonH (2015)
An urban laboratory for the multicultural nation?Ethnicities15(4): 586–604.
45.
WiseA (2013)
Hope in a land of strangers. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power10(1): 37–45.
46.
WiseANobleG (2016)
Convivialities: An orientation. Journal of Intercultural Studies37(5): 423–431.
47.
Whitepaper (2012–2013) A Comprehensive Integration Policy. Diversity and Community. Norwegian Ministry of Children, Equality and Social Inclusion.
