We describe migrants' early patterns of identification with the receiving society and explain why these differ by migrants' origins. Using longitudinal data from a novel survey among recent immigrants from Poland and Turkey in Germany enables us to analyse the nexus between social assimilation, ethnic boundaries and identification more directly than previous studies.
Theoretically, we start out from assimilation theory and its assumption that migrants' identification with the receiving country is a consequence of their preceding social and cognitive assimilation and from the literature on ethnic boundaries.
Results suggest that Turkish new migrants start out with higher levels of identification with Germany than Poles. Over time, however, their national identification decreases while it increases for Poles. This is partly explained by the fact that Turkish migrants' social assimilation stagnates; more importantly, only Turks perceive more rather than less discrimination and value incompatibility over time.
While both groups' identificational integration with the receiving country thus starts out from different conditions, they do not show a fundamentally dissimilar pattern with respect to the consequences of assimilation and discrimination for their national identification. Yet, the negative impact of the latter is stronger for Turks than for Poles, reflecting the greater salience of ethnic boundaries for this group.
AlbaR (2005) Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies28(1): 20–49.
BlohmMWasmerM (2008) Einstellungen und Kontakte zu Ausländern [Attitudes and contacts with foreigners]. In: NollHHabichR (eds) Datenreport 2008: ein Sozialbericht für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, pp. 206–214.
5.
Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (2010) Migrationsbericht 2008, Nürnberg: Bundesministerium des Innern Referat Öffentlichkeitsarbeit.
6.
CrulMSchneiderJ (2012) Conclusions and implications: The integration context matters. In: CrulMSchneiderJLelieF (eds) The European Second Generation Compared: Does the Integration Context Matter?, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 375–404.
7.
De VroomeTVerkuytenMMartinovicB (2014) Host national identification of immigrants in the Netherlands. International Migration Review48(1): 76–102.
8.
Diehl C and Blohm M (2003) Rights or identity? Naturalization processes among “Labor migrants” in Germany. International Migration Review 37(1): 133--162.
9.
Diehl C, Gijsberts M, Güveli A, et al. (2015) Socio-Cultural Integration Processes among New Immigrants in Europe (SCIP) -- Data file for download. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne.
10.
DiehlCKoenigM (2013) God can wait – New migrants in Germany between early adaptation and religious reorganization. International Migration Review51(3): 8–22.
11.
DiehlCSchnellR (2006) Reactive ethnicity or assimilation? Statements, arguments, and first empirical evidence for labor migrants in Germany. International Migration Review40(4): 786–816.
12.
ErsanilliEKoopmansR (2010) Rewarding integration? Citizenship regulations and the socio-cultural integration of immigrants in the Netherlands, France and Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies36(5): 773–791.
13.
EsserH (2004) Does the “New” immigration require a “New” theory of intergenerational integration?International Migration Review38(3): 1126–1159.
14.
EsserH (2009) Pluralisierung oder assimilation? Effekte der multiplen inklusion auf die integration von migranten. Zeitschrift für Soziologie38(5): 358–378.
15.
Fischer-NeumannM (2014) Immigrants ethnic identification and political involvement in the face of discrimination: A longitudinal study of the German case. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies40(3): 339–362.
16.
FleischmannFPhaletKSwyngedouwM (2013) Dual identity under threat: When and how do Turkish and Moroccan minorities engage in politics?Zeitschrift für Psychologie221(4): 214–222.
17.
FonerNAlbaR (2008) Immigrant religion in the US and Western Europe: Bridge or barrier to inclusion?International Migration Review42(2): 360–392.
18.
GaertnerSLDovidioJF (2000) Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model, Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
19.
GordonMM (1964) Assimilation in American Life, New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Gresser A and Schacht D (2015) SCIP Survey-Methodological Report. Konstanz. Available at: www.scip-info.org (accessed 2 November 2015).
21.
HansS (2010) Assimilation oder Segregation? Anpassungsprozesse von Einwanderern in Deutschland [Assimilation or segregation? Processes of adaptation of migrants in Germany], Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
22.
HansenML (1962) The third generation in America. Commentary14: 492–500.
23.
HochmanODavidovE (2014) Relations between second-language proficiency and national identification: The case of immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review30(3): 344–359.
24.
HowardJA (2000) Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology26: 367–393.
25.
Jasinskaja-LahtiILiebkindKSolheimE (2009) To identify or not to identify? National disidentification as an alternative reaction to perceived ethnic discrimination. Applied Psychology58(1): 105–128.
26.
JiménezTR (2008) Mexican immigrant replenishment and the continuing significance of ethnicity and race. American Journal of Sociology113(6): 1527–1567.
27.
JoppkeC (2007) Beyond national models: Civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe. West European Politics30(1): 1–22.
28.
LeszczenskyL (2013) Do national identification and interethnic friendships affect one another? A longitudinal test with adolescents of Turkish origin in Germany. Social Science Research42(3): 775–788.
29.
LubbersMJMolinaJLMcCartyC (2007) Personal networks and ethnic identifications: The case of migrants in Spain. International Sociology22(6): 721–741.
30.
MillerJM (2000) Language use, identity, and social interaction: Migrant students in Australia. Research on Language and Social Interaction33(1): 69–100.
31.
OwensTJRobinsonDTSmith-LovinL (2010) Three faces of identity. Sociology36(1): 477.
32.
PhinneyJSOngAD (2007) Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions. Journal of Counseling Psychology54(3): 271–281.
33.
PortesARumbautRG (2001) Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
RubinDB (1987) Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, New York: Wiley.
35.
SarrazinT (2010) Deutschland schafft sich ab: Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen, Deutsche: Verlags-Anstalt.
36.
Schulz B and Leszczensky L (2015) Native friends and host country identification among adolescent immigrants in Germany: The role of ethnic boundaries. International Migration Review. Epub ahead of print n/a. DOI: 10.1111/imre.12163.
37.
SchwartzSJ (2005) A new identity for identity research: Recommendations for expanding and refocusing the identity literature. Journal of Adolescent Research20(3): 293–308.
38.
SkrobanekJ (2009) Perceived discrimination, ethnic identity and the (re-) ethnicisation of youth with a Turkish ethnic background in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies35(4): 535–554.
39.
TajfelH (1978) Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, London: Academic Press.
40.
TajfelH (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology, Cambridge [Cambridgeshire], New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
VerkuytenM (2005) The Social Psychology of Ethnic Identity, Hove: Psychology Press.
42.
VerkuytenMMartinovicB (2012) Immigrants national identification: Meanings, determinants, and consequences. Social Issues and Policy Review6(1): 82–112.
43.
VerkuytenMYildizAA (2007) National (dis) identification and ethnic and religious identity: A study among Turkish–Dutch Muslims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin33(10): 1448–1462.
44.
WaltersDPhythianKAnisefA (2007) The acculturation of Canadian immigrants: Determinants of ethnic identification with the host society. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology44(1): 37–64.
45.
WatersMC (1990) Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America, CA: Berkeley.
46.
WimmerA (2008) The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: A multilevel process theory. American Journal of Sociology113(4): 970–1022.
47.
YagmurKVan De VijverFJR (2012) Acculturation and language orientations of Turkish immigrants in Australia, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology43(7): 1110–1130.
48.
ZimmermannLZimmermannKFConstantA (2007) Ethnic self-identification of first-generation immigrants. International Migration Review41(3): 769–781.
49.
ZolbergARWoonLL (1999) Why Islam is like Spanish: Cultural incorporation in Europe and the United States. Politics & Society27(1): 5–38.
