Scholarship on immigrant political participation has recently examined how immigrants engage in collective action in the receiving society, whereas scholarship focussing on immigrant home-country politics has focused on debating immigrant political engagement vis-à-vis the origin society. What the literature has neglected is how immigrants engage simultaneously in immigrant and home–country politics. This article fills this lacuna through multi-sited fieldwork observations and interviews, showing how the Ecuadorian participants in this study engage in home-country politics in Madrid and New York City through grassroots organisations and why the leaders and members of these organisations reach out to non-ethnically based associations to make demands on the receiving society governments. The engagement of Ecuadorian political parties in the host societies heightens distrust among the participants in this study, inhibiting their organisation at the ethno-national level. As a result, participants find venues for engagement outside of their nationality group.
Alba R and Nee V (1997) Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. International Migration Review 31(4). Special Issue: Immigrant adaptation and native-born responses in the making of Americans, pp. 826–874.
2.
AlbaRNeeV (2003) Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BermudezA (2010) The transnational political practices of Colombians in Spain and the United Kindom: Politics “here” and “there.”. Ethnic and Racial Studies33(1): 75–91. DOI: 10.1080/01419870903125838.
4.
BloemraadI (2006) Becoming a citizen in the United States and Canada: Structured mobilization and immigrant political incorporation. Social Forces85(2): 667–695.
5.
BloemraadI (2013) The promise and pitfalls of comparative research design in the study of migration. Migration Studies1(1): 27–46.
6.
BloemraadIRamakrishnanK (2008) Civic Hopes and Political Realities: Immigrants, Community Organizations, and Political Engagement, New York City: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
7.
Boccagni P (2009a) Tracce transnazionali. Vite in Italia e proiezioni verso casa tra i migrantiecuadoriani. Milano: Franco Angeli.
8.
BoccagniP (2009b) Private, public or both? On the scope anld impact of transnationalism in immigrants’ everyday lives. In: BauböckRFaistT (eds) Transnationalism and Diaspora. Concepts, Theories and Methods, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 185–204.
9.
Boccagni P (2009c) Whom should we help first? Transnational helping practices in Ecuadorian Migration. International Migration 51(2): 191--208.
10.
Boccagni P (2009d) “I’m not like all these Latinos.” From ethnicization to selective ethnicity appropriation as a lever for social integration overseas. In Paper presented at the IMISCOE Theory Conference on “Interethnic Relations: Multidisciplinary Approaches,” Lisbon, Portugal.
11.
BuekerC (2005) Political incorporation among immigrants from ten areas of origin: The persistence of source country effects. IMR39(1): 103–140.
12.
C.A.S (2013) Informe de la Población Extranjera Empadronada en Madrid, Madrid, Spain: Consejería de Asuntos Sociales. Comunidad de Madrid.
13.
ConaghanC (1989) Ecuador: The politics of locos. Hemisphere1(1): 13–15.
DaneseG (1998) Transnational collective action in Europe: The case of migrants in Italy and Spain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies24(4): 715–733.
16.
ErdmansM (1995) Immigrants and ethnics-conflict and identity in Chicago Polonia. Sociological Quarterly36(1): 175–195.
17.
FitzGeraldD (2004) Beyond transnationalism. Mexican hometown politics at an American labour union. Ethnic and Racial Studies27(2): 228–247.
18.
FitzGerald D (2009) A Nation of Emigrants: How Mexico Manages its Migration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
FitzGeraldD (2012) A comparativist manifesto for international migration studies. Ethnic and Racial Studies35(10): 1725–1740.
20.
FLACSO-UNFPA (2008) Ecuador: la migración internacional en cifras. Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas Quito, Ecuador.
21.
FonerN (2002) From Ellis Island to JFK: New York City’s Two Great Waves of Immigration, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Gerstle G and Mollenkopf J (eds) (2001) E Pluribus Unum?: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation. New York City: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
GiugniMPassyF (2004) Migrant mobilization between political institutions and citizenship regimes: A comparison of France and Switzerland. European Journal of Political Research43(1): 51–82.
24.
GlazerN (1993) Is assimilation dead?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530: 122–136.
25.
GlazerNMoynihanD (1970) Beyond the Melting Pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians, and Irish and New York City, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
GoldS (1995) Gender, class, and network: Social structure and migration patterns among transnational Israelis. Global Networks1(1): 57–78.
27.
Gómez Ciriano E (2007) Ecuatorianos en España: Claves de un proceso migratorio en cuatro tiempos. In: Gómez Ciriano EJ, Tornos Cubillo A and the Colectivo IOÉ (eds) Ecuatorianos en España. Una aproximación sociológica. Observatorio de la inmigración en España. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, pp.15--100.
28.
GordonM (1964) Assimilation in American Life, New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
GrattonB (2007) Ecuadorians in the United States and Spain: History, gender and niche formation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies33(4): 581–599.
30.
GuarnizoL (2001) On the political participation of transnational migrants: Old practice new trends. In: GerstleMMollenkopfJ (eds) E Pluribus Unum? Contemporary and Historical Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation, New York City: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 213–264.
31.
GuarnizoLPortesAHallerW (2003) Assimilation and transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology108(6): 1211–1214.
32.
GuarnizoLSanchezARoachE (1999) Mistrust, fragmented solidarity, and transnational migration: Colombians in New York City and Los Angeles. Ethnic and Racial Studies22(2): 367–396.
33.
Hall A (2005) Globalized livelihoods. In: International migration and challenges for social policy: The case of Ecuador. London School of Economics and Political Science, Arusha Conference, New Frontiers of Social Policy, 12–15 December.
34.
HeinJ (2006) Ethnic Origins: the Adaptation of Cambodian and Hmong Refugees in Four American Cities, New York City: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
HerreraG (2005) Mujeres ecuatorianas en las cadenas globales del cuidado. In: HerreraGCarrilloMCTorresA (eds) La migración ecuatoriana transnacionalismo, redes e identidades, Ecuador: FLACSO Quito, pp. 281–304.
36.
HochschildJMollenkopfJ (2009) Bringing outsiders. In: Transnational Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
37.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística de España (INE) 1998, 2004 Anuario Estadístico de España 1998 y Anuario Estadístico de España 2004, Madrid.
38.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística de España (INE) 2008, 2013. Anuario Estadístico de España 2008 y Anuario Estadístico de España 2013, Madrid. Available at: http://www.ine.es/prodyser/pubweb/anuarios_mnu.htm (accessed 10 April 2015).
39.
JokischBPribilskyJ (2002) The panic to leave: Economic crisis and the ‘new emigration’ from Ecuador. International Migration40(4): 76–101.
40.
Jones-CorreaM (1998) Between Two Nations: The Political Predicament of Latinos in New York City, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
41.
Jones-CorreaM (2001) Under two flags: Dual nationality in Latin America and its consequences for naturalization in the United States. IMR35(4): 997–1029.
42.
KatznelsonI (1981) City Trenches: Urban America and the Patterning of Class in the United States, New York City: Pantheon Books.
43.
KazalR (1995) Revisiting assimilation: The rise, fall and reappraisal of a concept in American ethnic history. American Historical Review100(2): 437–471.
44.
KlandermansBVan Der ToornJVan StekelenburgJ (2008) Embeddedness and identity: How immigrants turn grievances into action. American Sociological Review73(6): 992–1012.
45.
KoopmansR (2004) Migrant mobilisation and political opportunities: Variation among German cities and a comparison with the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies30(3): 449–470.
46.
KoopmansROlzakS (2004) Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right wing violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology110(1): 198–230.
47.
KoopmansRStathamPGiugniM (2005) Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
48.
Kyle D (2000) Transnational Peasants: Migrations, Networks, and Ethnicity in Andean Ecuador. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
49.
LandoltPGoldringL (2009) Immigrant political socialization as bridging and boundary work: Mapping the multi-layered incorporation of Latin American immigrants in Toronto. Ethnic and Racial Studies32(7): 1226–1247.
Latino Data Project (2009) The Latino Population of New York City in 2008, Report 32. Center for Latin American, Caribbean and Latino Studies, Graduate Center: City University of New York, New York.
52.
MargheretisA (2011) Todos Somos Migrantes (We are all migrants): The paradoxes of innovative state-led transnationalism in Ecuador. International Political Sociology5: 198–217.
53.
MollenkopfJ (1999) Urban political conflicts and alliances: New York City and Los Angeles compared. In: HirshmanCKasinitzPDe WindJ (eds) The Handbook of International Migration: The American Experience, New York City: Russell Sage, pp. 391–412.
54.
MoralesLPilatiK (2013) The political transnationalism of Ecuadorians in Barcelona, Madrid and Milan: The role of individual resources, organizational engagement and the political context. Global Networks14: 1.
55.
MoyaJC (2005) Immigrants and associations: A global and historical perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies31(5): 833–864.
56.
OkamotoD (2003) Toward a theory of panethnicity: Explaining Asian American collective action. American Sociological Review68(6): 811–842.
57.
OkamotoDEbertK (2010) Beyond the ballot: Immigrant collective action in gateways and new destinations in the United States. Social Problems57(4): 529–558.
58.
Østergaard-Nielsen E (2003a) Transnational Politics: The Case of Turks and Kurds in Germany. London and New York: Routledge.
59.
Østergaard-NielsenE (2003b) The politics of migrants’ transnational political practices. IMR37(3): 760–786.
60.
ParkR (1928) Human migration and the marginal man. The American Journal of Sociology33(6): 881–893.
61.
PechuC (1999) Black African immigrants in France and claims for housing. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies25(4): 727–744.
62.
Pew Hispanic Center Fact Sheet, April 22 (2010) Hispanics of Ecuadorian origin in the United States. Based on the Census Bureau’s 2008 American Community Survey (ACS). Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.
63.
PortesAEscobarCAranaR (2009) Divided or convergent loyalties: The political incorporation process of Latin American immigrants in the United States. International Journal of Comparative Sociology50: 103.
64.
Portes A, Guarnizo L and Landolt P (1999) The study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research. Ethnic and Racial Studies 22(2): 217--237.
65.
Portes A (1997) Immigration theory for a new century: Some problems and opportunities. International Migration Review 31(4): 799--825. Special Issue: Immigrant Adaptation and Native-Born Responses in the Making of Americans.
66.
PortesAMozoR (1985) The political adaptation process of Cubans and other ethnic minorities in the United States: A preliminary analysis. IMR19(1): 35–63.
67.
PortesARumbautR (1996) Immigrant America: A Portrait, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
68.
PortesAZhouM (1993) The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences530(1): 74–96.
69.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, New York City: Simon and Schuster.
70.
Ramírez J and Boccagni P (2010) Voto a la distancia: análisis de la participación política de los ecuatorianos en el exterior. In: Amescua C, Luque CJ and Urbano J (eds) Política en Movimiento: Estado, ciudadanía, exilio y migración en América. México D.F.: UACM-UIA, pp.272--304.
71.
RothW (2012) Race Migrations: Latinos and the Cultural Transformation of Race, Redwood, CA: Stanford University Press.
72.
RumbautR (1997) Assimilation and its discontents: Between rhetoric and reality. IMR31(4): 923–960.
73.
Serrano A (2008) Perfil Migratorio del Ecuador. Geneve, Switzerlad: OIM.
74.
Smith MP and Bakker M (2008) Citizenship Across Borders: The Political Transnationalism of El Migrante. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
75.
Smith MP and Guarnizo L (1998) Transnationalism from Below. Vol. 6. Comparative Urban and Community Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
76.
Smith RC (2006) Mexican New York: Transnational Lives of New Immigrants. University of California Press.
77.
TarrowS (1994) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
78.
ThomasWZnanieckiF (1919] (1995) Edited by Eli Zaretsky. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America: A Classic Work in Immigration History, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
79.
ThoumiFGrindleM (1992) La Política de la Economía del Ajuste: La Actual Experiencia Ecuatoriana, Ecuador: FLACSO Quito.
80.
Tocqueville (De) A (2000) Democracy in America. In: Mansfield H and Winthrop D (eds). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81.
VerbaSSchlozmanKBradyH (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
82.
WaldingerR (2008) Between “here” and “there”: Immigrants cross-border activities and loyalties. IMR42(1): 3–29.
Waldinger R (2015) The Cross-Border Connection: Immigrnats, Emmigrants and Their Homelands. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
85.
WaldingerRFitzGeraldD (2004) Transnationalism in question. American Journal of Sociology109(5): 1177–1195.
86.
WaldingerRLichterM (2003) How the Other Half Works, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
87.
WaldingerRSoehlTNelsonL (2012) Emigrants and the body politic left behind: Results from the Latino National Survey. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38(5): 711–736.
88.
WarnerLlSroleL (1945) The Social Systems of American Ethnic Groups, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
89.
WatersM (2008) The challenges of studying political and civic incorporation. Applied Development Science12(2): 105–107.
90.
Welp Y (2008) La participación ciudadana en la encrucijada. Los mecanismos de democracia directa en Ecuador, Perú y Argentina. Iconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 31, pp.117--130.
91.
WongJ (2006) Democracy’s Promise: Immigrants and American Civic Institutions, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Zamosc L (2004) The Indian Movement in Ecuador: From politics of influence to politics of power. In: Postero NG and Zamosc L (eds) The Struggle for Indigenous Rights in Latin America. Sussex Academic Press, pp.131--157.
94.
Zhou M (1997) Growing up American: The challenge confronting immigrant children and children of immigrants. Annual Review of Sociology 23: 63--95.
