What are the conditions under which resources embedded in the social networks of entrepreneurs can be accessed and mobilized in purposive action? We interviewed a sample of 10 native Dutch and 22 immigrant entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. Trust was an important facilitator of social support from so-called ‘strong ties’ and proved effective in maintaining already established relations with ‘weak ties’. Accessing social support through weak ties, however, appeared more difficult due to distrust and discrimination. This applied particularly to immigrant entrepreneurs working in a neighborhood with a low concentration of immigrants: a context making ethnicity more salient. In this context distrust and discrimination coincided with problematic access to Dutch clientele and less collaboration with Dutch businessmen.
AdlerPSKwonSW (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review27(1): 17–40.
2.
Achidi NdoforHPriemRL (2011) Immigrant entrepreneurs, the ethnic enclave strategy, and venture performance. Journal of Management37(3): 790–818.
3.
AldrichHEWaldingerR (1990) Ethnicity and entrepreneurship. Annual Review in Sociology16(1): 111–135.
4.
AldrichHEZimmerCMcEvoyD (1989) Continuities in the study of ecological succession: Asian businesses in three English cities. Social Forces67(4): 920–944.
5.
AnthiasFCederbergM (2009) Using ethnic bonds in self-employment and the issue of social capital. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies35(6): 901–917.
6.
BainesSWheelockJ (1998) Reinventing traditional solutions: Job creation, gender and the micro-business household. Work, Employment & Society12(4): 579–601.
7.
BankstonCLZhouM (2002) Social capital as process: The meanings and problems of a theoretical metaphor. Sociological Inquiry72(2): 285–317.
8.
BasuA (1998) An exploration of entrepreneurial activity among Asian small businesses in Britain. Small Business Economics10(4): 313–326.
9.
BasuAAltinayE (2002) The interaction between culture and entrepreneurship in London’s immigrant businesses. International Small Business Journal20(4): 371–393.
10.
BerryJWPhinneyJSSamDLVedderP (2006) Immigrant Youth in Cultural Transition: Acculturation, Identity and Adaptation Across National Contexts, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
BranscombeNRSchmittMTHarveyRD (1999) Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77: 135–149.
12.
BuchanNRCrosonRTADawesRM (2002) Swift neighbors and persistent strangers: A cross-cultural investigation of trust and reciprocity in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology108(1): 168–206.
13.
BurtRS (1984) Network items and the General Social Survey. Social Networks6(4): 293–339.
14.
BurtRS (2001) Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In: LinNCookKBurtRS (eds) Social Capital: Theory and Research, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 31–56.
15.
CarterWCFeldSL (2004) Principles relating social regard to size and density of personal networks, with applications to stigma. Social Networks26(4): 323–329.
16.
ColemanJS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
17.
CBS (2010) Central Bureau of Statistics database. Available at: statline.cbs.nl (accessed 21 January 2010).
18.
ChandMGhorbaniM (2011) National culture, networks and ethnic entrepreneurship: A comparison of the Indian and Chinese immigrants in the US. International Business Review20(6): 593–606.
19.
CoendersMLubbersMScheepersPVerkuytenM (2008) More than two decades of changing ethnic attitudes in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues64(2): 269–285.
20.
DagevosJGesthuizenM (2005) Niet-westerse Allochtonen met een Stabiele Arbeidsmarktpositie:Aaantallen en Ontwikkelingen [Non-western immigrants with a stable labor market position: Numbers and developments], The Hague: The Netherlands Institue for Social Sciences.
FairlieRWMeyerBD (1996) Ethnic and racial self-employment differences and possible explanations. Journal of Human Resources31(4): 757–793.
23.
GonzalezKVVerkuytenMWeesieJPoppeE (2008) Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. Britisch Journal of Social Psychology47(4): 667–685.
24.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
25.
GranovetterMS (1985) Economic action and social structure: The Problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology91(3): 481–510.
26.
HagendoornLPepelsJ (2003) Why the Dutch maintain more social distance from some ethnic minorities than others: A model explaining the ethnic hierarchy. In: HagendoornLVeenmanJVolleberghW (eds) Integrating Immigrants in the Netherlands: Culltural versus Socio-economic Integration, Burlington, USA: Ashgate Publishing Company, pp. 41–62.
27.
HesselsSJASuddleKMooibroekM (2008) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007: The Netherlands, Zoetermeer: EIM.
28.
HiteJMHesterlyWS (2001) The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal22(3): 275–286.
29.
IyerGRShapiroJM (1999) Ethnic entrepreneurial and marketing systems: Implications for the global economy. Journal of International Marketing7(4): 83–110.
30.
JonesTRamM (2007) Re-embedding the ethnic business agenda. Work, Employment & Society21(3): 439–457.
31.
KanterRM (1977) Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology82(5): 965–990.
32.
KarraNTraceyPPhillipsN (2006) Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(6): 861–877.
33.
KitchingJSmallboneDAthaydeR (2009) Ethnic diasporas and business competitiveness: minority-owned enterprises in London. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies35(4): 689–705.
34.
KloostermanR (2010) Matching opportunities with resources: A framework for analysing (migrant) entrepreneurship from a mixed embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development22(1): 25–45.
35.
KloostermanRRathJ (2001) Immigrant entrepreneurship in advanced economies: Mixed embeddedness further explored. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies27(2): 189–202.
36.
Kloosterman R and Rath J (2010) Shifting landscapes in immigrant entrepreneurship. In: OECD (eds) Open for business: Migrant entrepreneurship in OECD countries. pp.101–123. OECD Publishing. Available at: dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264095830-en (accessed 10 October 2011).
37.
KloostermanRVan Der LeunJRathJ (1999) Mixed embeddedness: (In)formal economic activities and immigrant businesses in the Netherlands. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23(2): 252–266.
38.
KomterAE (2005) Social Solidarity and the Gift, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
LeyD (2006) Explaining variations in business performance among immigrant entrepreneurs in canada. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies32(5): 743–764.
40.
LinN (1999) Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology25(1): 467–487.
41.
LinN (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
LinNFuYHsungR (2001) The Position Generator: Measurement Techniques for Investigations of Social Capital, New Brunswick, NJ and London: AldineTransaction.
43.
MenziesTVBrennerGAFilionLJLowryLPerraultCRamangalahyC (2000) Transnational entrepreneurship and bootstrap capitalism: Social capital, networks and ethnic minority entrepreneurs, Paper presented at the Second Biennial McGill Conference on International Entrepreneurship: Researching New Frontiers.
44.
MerzEOortFJOzeke-KocabasESchuengelC (2009) Intergenerational family solidarity: Value differences between immigrant groups and generations. Journal of Family Psychology23(3): 291–300.
45.
Nijkamp P, Stough R and Sahin M (2009) Impact of social and human capital on business performance of migrant entrepreneurs: A comparative Dutch–US study. VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Economics. Available at: ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/vuarem/2009-17.html (accessed 14 October 2010).
46.
PhaletKSchönpflugU (2001) Intergenerational transmissions of collectivism and achievement values in two acculturation contexts: The case of Turkish families in Germany and Turkish and Moroccan families in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology32(2): 186–201.
47.
PhaletKSwyngedouwM (2003) Measuring immigrant integration: The case of Belgium. Migration Studies40(125): 773–803.
48.
PortesALandoltP (2000) Social capital: Promise and pitfalls of its role in development. Journal of Latin American Studies32(2): 529–547.
49.
PortesASensebrennerJ (1993) Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology98(6): 1320–1350.
50.
RamMSmallboneDDeakinsDJonesT (2003) Banking on ‘break-out’: Finance and the development of etnhic minority businesses. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies29(4): 663–681.
51.
SandersJMNeeV (1996) Immigrant self-employment: The family as social capital and the value of human capital. American Sociological Review61(2): 231–249.
52.
SellersRMSmithMASheltonJNRowleySAJChavousTM (1998) Multidimensional model of racial identity: A reconceptualization of African American racial identity. Personality & Social Psychology Review2(1): 18–18.
53.
TajfelH (1978) Differentiation Between Social Groups, London: Academic Press.
54.
TajfelHTurnerIC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: WorchelSAustinW (eds) Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Chicago: Nelson-Hall, pp. 33–48.
55.
VerkuytenMZarembaK (2005) Interethnic relations in a changing political context. Social Psychology Quarterly68(4): 375–386.
56.
ZakPJKnackS (2001) Trust and growth. Economic Journal111(470): 295–321.
