There is much to be commended in Habermas’s suggestions for the relaxation of the constraints on public liberalism and the idealized norms of deliberative democratic debate in his proposals for the introduction of new institutional spaces that will facilitate the engagement between what he calls ‘religious’ and ‘secular’ citizens in his writings on ‘post-secular’ societies. The article examines the parallels between Habermas’s proposed democratic innovations, which will facilitate the introduction of ‘situated knowledges’ through proposing what I.M. Young would call ‘communicative leveling’, within the context of criticisms of secularism, public realism and the critiques of the idealized norms of deliberative democracy. However, it will be suggested here that there is also a certain convergence between Habermas’s theoretical interventions and the ‘instrumental engagement’ of governments with minority religious communities in the post-9/11 context.
AudiR (2000) Religious Commitment and Secular Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BaderV (2007) Secularism or Democracy? Associational Diversity, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
3.
BaderV(2009) Secularism, public reason or moderately agonistic democracy? In: LeveyGBModoodT (eds) Secularism, Religion and Multicultural Citizenship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–136.
4.
BarberB (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
5.
BenhabibS (2002) The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
6.
CallanE (1997) Creating Citizens: Political Education and Liberal Democracy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
ChambersS (2007) How religion speaks to the agnostic: Habermas on the persistent value of religion. Constellation; 14(2): 210–223.
8.
ChapmanRHamalainenL(2011) Understanding faith-based engagement and volunteering in the post-secular society: Motivations, rationales and translations. In: BeaumontJBakerC (eds) Postsecular Cities: Space, Theory & Practice, London: Continuum, pp. 184–202.
9.
ClokeP(2011) Emerging postsecular rapproachment in the contemporary city. In: BeaumontJBakerC (eds) Postsecular Cities: Space, Theory & Practice, London: Continuum, pp. 237–254.
10.
CodeL (1995) Rhetorical Spaces: Essays on Gendered Locations, London & New York: Routledge.
11.
CohenJ(1996) Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In: BenhabibS (ed) Democracy and Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 95–119.
12.
Communities and Local Government Department. (2008) Face to Face and Side by Side: A Framework for Partnership in our Multi Faith Society. London: Communities and Local Government Department.
13.
CookeM (2007) A secular state for a postsecular society? Post-metaphysical political theory and the place of religion. Constellations; 14(2): 224–238.
14.
DeanM (1999) Governmentality, London: Sage.
15.
DeveauxM(2005) A deliberative approach to conflicts and culture. In: EisenbergASpinner-HavelJ (eds) Minorities within Minorities: equality, rights, diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 340–362.
16.
DinhamALowndesV(2009) Faith and the public realm. In: DinhamA (ed) Faith in the Public Realm: Controversies, Policies & Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 1–20.
17.
DobbernackJ (2010) ‘Things fall apart’: Social imaginaries and the politics of cohesion. Critical Policy Studies; 4(2): 146–163.
18.
DryzekJ (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
FoucaultM (1965) Madness and Civilization, New York: Pantheon Books.
20.
GutmannAThompsonD (1996) Democracy and Disagreement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
HabermasJ (1997) Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
HabermasJ (2003) The Future of Human Nature, Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
HabermasJ (2006a) Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy; 14(1): 1–25.
24.
HabermasJ(2006b) Pre-Political Foundations of the Democratic Constitutional State? In: SchullerF (ed) Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger and Jürgen Habermas: Dialectics of Secularization – on Reason and Religion, San Francisco: Ingnatius Press, pp. 19–52.
25.
HabermasJ (2008) Notes on post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly; 25: 17–29.
26.
HabermasJ(2010) An awareness of what is missing. In: HabermasJ (ed) An Awareness of What is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 15–23.
27.
HarringtonA (2007) Habermas and the ‘post-secular society’. European Journal of Social Theory; 10(4): 543–560.
28.
Home Office. (2004) Working Together: Co-operation between Government and Faith Communities. London: Home Office Faith Communities Unit.
29.
JoasS (2008) Do We Need Religion? On the Experience of Self-Transcendence, Bolder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
30.
KnightJJohnsonJ(2007) What sort of political equality does deliberative democracy require? In: BohmanJRehgW (eds) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge and London: MIT Press, pp. 285–322.
31.
LafontC (2007) Religion in the public sphere: Remarks on Habermas’s Conception of Public Deliberation in Post-Secular Societies. Constellations; 14(2): 239–259.
32.
LeveyGB(2009) Secularism and religion in a Multicultural Age. In: LeveyGBModoodT (eds) Secularism, Religion and Multicultural Citizenship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–24.
33.
MaclureJ (2006) On the public use of practical reason: Loosening the grip of neo-Kantianism. Philosophy & Social Criticism; 32(1): 37–63.
34.
McGhee D (2008) The End of Multiculturalism? Terrorism, integration and human rights. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
35.
McGheeD (2010) Security, Citizenship & Human Rights: Shared Values in Uncertain Times, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
36.
McLennanG (2007) Towards a postsecular sociology?Sociology; 41(5): 857–870.
37.
ModoodT (2007) Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea, Cambridge: Polity Press.
38.
ModoodTKastoryanoR(2006) Secularism and the accommodation of Muslims in Europe. In: ModoodTTriandafyllidouAZapata-BarreroR (eds) Multiculturalism, Muslims & Citizenship, London: Routledge, pp. 162–178.
39.
ParekhB (2000) Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
ParekhB (2008) A New Politics of Identity: Political Principles for an Independent World, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
PlantR(2010) Citizenship, religion, and political liberalism. In: BiggarNHoganL (eds) Religious Voices in Public Places, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–57.
42.
RawlsJ (1999) Collected Papers – John Rawls, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
RawlsJ (2005) Political Liberalism, Expanded Edition, New York: Columbia University Press.
44.
RiordanP (2004) Permission to speak: Religious arguments in public reason. Heythorp Journal; 45: 178–196.
45.
RoseN (1999) Powers of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Spinner-HavelJ (2000) Surviving Diversity – Religion and Democratic Citizenship, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
47.
TullyJ (2004) Approaches to recognition, power and dialogue. Political Theory; 32(6): 855–862.
48.
YoungIM (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
