By reviewing the books What is Religious Authority?, Repairing Infrastructures, and The Punishment of Pirates, in this essay I argue that they signal a shift toward the adoption of infrastructure as a “bridging concept” within the social sciences and the humanities. By examining how the books’ authors mobilize the notion of infrastructure in their explanatory strategies, I highlight the productivity of this concept for the analysis of social situations and the interpretations arising within them.
AbendG (2023) Words and Distinctions for the Common Good: Practical Reason in the Logic of Social Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AlatasIF (2021) What is Religious Authority? Cultivating Islamic Communities in Indonesia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
AlexanderJC (2004) Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociological Theory22(4): 527–573.
4.
AnduezaLDaviesALoftusA, et al (2021) The body as infrastructure. Environment and Planning A4(3): 799–817.
5.
BaggioJABrownKHellebrandtD (2015) Boundary object or bridging concept? A citation network analysis of resilience. Ecology and Society20(2): 2–13.
6.
BorghiV (2019) The possible in the real: Infrastructures of experience, cosmopolitanism from below and sociology. Quaderni di teoria sociale1(65): 35–59.
7.
BowkerGC (1994) Science on the Run: Information Management and Industrial Geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920-1940. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8.
BowkerGCStarSL (2000) Sorting Things Out. Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
9.
BridgesM (2023) The infrastructural turn in historical scholarship. Modern American History6(1): 103–120.
10.
CampoECittonY (eds) (2024) The Politics of Curiosity: Alternatives to the Attention Economy. London: Routledge.
11.
CarseA (2016) Keyword: Infrastructure. How a humble French engineering term shaped the modern world. In: HarveyPJensenCMoritaA (eds) Infrastructures and Social Complexity. London: Routledge, pp.45–57.
DeenerA (2020) The Problem With Feeding Cities: The Social Transformation of Infrastructure, Abundance, and Inequality in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
GinzburgC (2012) Our words, and theirs: A reflection on the historian’s craft, today. In: FellmanSRahikainenM (eds) Historical Knowledge: In Quest of Theory, Method and Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp.97–119.
15.
GrahamSMarvinS (2002) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
16.
GuhinJ (2024) Traces of the dead, actions of the not-alive: A prologue to a theory of agentification. American Behavioral Scientist68(5): 660–677.
17.
HarrisM (1976) History and significance of the emic/etic distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology5(1): 329–350.
18.
HeathcottJSofferJZimmermanR (2022) Urban Infrastructure. Historical and Social Dimensions of an Interconnected World. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
19.
HenkeCR (1999) The mechanics of workplace order: Toward a sociology of repair. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 44(1): 55–81.
20.
HenkeCRSimsB (2020) Repairing Infrastructures: The Maintenance of Materiality and Power. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21.
JerolmackCTavoryI (2014) Molds and totems: Nonhumans and the constitution of the social self. Sociological Theory32(1): 64–77.
22.
KlinenbergE (2018) Palaces for the People: How Social Infrastructure Can Help Fight Inequality, Polarization, and the Decline of Civic Life. New York, NY: Crown.
23.
LarkinB (2008) Signal and Noise: Media, Infrastructure, and Urban Culture in Nigeria. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
LarkinB (2013) The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology42(1): 327–343.
25.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
MartinJL (2022) Theory at the edge of empire. International Sociology37(2): 175–185.
27.
MukerjiC (1997) Territorial Ambitions and the Gardens of Versailles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MukerjiC (2009) Impossible Engineering: Technology and Territoriality on the Canal Du Midi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
MusianiF (2022) Infrastructuring digital sovereignty: A research agenda for an infrastructure-based sociology of digital self-determination practices. Information Communication & Society25(6): 785–800.
30.
NortonM (2020) Cultural sociology meets the cognitive wild: Advantages of the distributed cognition framework for analyzing the intersection of culture and cognition. American Journal of Cultural Sociology8(1): 45–62.
31.
NortonM (2023) The Punishment of Pirates. Interpretation and Institutional Order in the Early Modern British Empire. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
ReedIA (2020) Power in Modernity: Agency Relations and the Creative Destruction of the King’s Two Bodies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CA: Yale University Press.
34.
SimoneA (2004) People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture16(3): 407–429.
35.
SimsB (2000) On shifting ground: Earthquakes, retrofit and engineering culture in California. PhD Thesis, University of California, San Diego, USA.
36.
StarSL (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist43(3): 377–391.
37.
StarSLBowkerGC (2006) How to infrastructure. In: LievrouwLALivingstoneS (eds) Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.230–245.
38.
StarSLGriesemerJR (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science19(3): 387–420.
39.
StarSLRuhlederK (1994) Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. In: SmithJBSmithFDMaloneTW (eds) Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, pp.253–264.
40.
WilsonA (2016) The infrastructure of intimacy. Signs41(2): 247–280.
