Abstract
Max Weber’s theoretical constitution of sociological ideal types is examined, and a number of key elements and characteristics of such types are identified. Additionally, several common misconceptions with respect to Weber’s sociological types are clarified, including the erroneous assumption that his sociological ideal types were formulated on an ad hoc basis, as well as the common complaint that these types are overly abstract and more suited to classification than explanation. By combining Weber’s methodological discussions of the ideal type with examples taken from his substantive studies, Weber’s sociological ideal types are shown to have been constructed as integrated components of theoretical schemes which, when applied to an empirical context, provide comprehensive explanations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
