Can Robert K. Merton’s seminal work in the sociology of science still offer useful insights to understand key features, trends and challenges of science in contemporary societies? This article focuses on two main topics. It addresses the general theme of values and norms in science in the light of relevant organizational changes that have marked science in recent decades, as well as the resilience of the concept of ‘scientific community’ to those changes. Starting from Merton’s classical study of the ‘Matthew effect’, the article then analyses the theme of competition in science, with particular regard to the dynamics that characterize the reputation and visibility of scientists.
AndersonC (2006) The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less for More. New York: Hyperion.
2.
BarnesB (1985) About Science. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
BarnesBDolbyRGA (1970) The scientific ethos: A deviant viewpoint. European Journal of Sociology11: 3–25.
4.
BeckerH (2011) Review of J.H. Searle: Making the social world, and P. Boghossian: Fear of knowledge. Science, Technology, & Human Values36: 273–279.
5.
BeltrameL (2007) Ipse dixit. I premi Nobel come argomento di autorità nella comunicazione pubblica della scienza. Studi di Sociologia1: 77–98.
6.
Ben-DavidJ (1971) The Scientist’s Role in Society: A Comparative Study. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Ben-DavidJ (1991) ‘Norms of Science’ and the sociological interpretation of scientific behavior. In: Ben-DavidJ (ed.) Scientific Growth: Essays on the Social Organization and Ethos of Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 469–484.
8.
BigluMH (2008) The influence of references per paper in the SCI to Impact Factors and the Matthew Effect. Scientometrics74(3): 453–470.
9.
BourdieuP (2004 [2001]) Science de la science et réflexivité [Science of Science and Reflexivity]. Paris: Raisons d’agir; trad. eng;. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
BucchiM (1998) Science and the Media. London: Routledge.
11.
BucchiM (2001) Intervista a Robert K. Merton. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia4: 655–659.
12.
BucchiM (2004) Science in Society: An Introduction to Social Studies of Science. London: Routledge.
13.
BucchiM (2009) Beyond Technocracy: Citizens, Politics, Technoscience. New York: Springer.
14.
BucchiM (2010) Visible scientists. In: Hornig-PriestS (ed.) Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 932–933.
15.
BucchiMNeresiniF (2007) Science and public participation. In: HackettEJAmsterdamskaOLynchM. (eds) New Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 449–473.
16.
BucchiMNeresiniF (2011) Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions. Public Understanding of Science20(1): 64–79.
17.
CalhounC (2010) (ed.) Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
CallonM (1999) The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Science, Technology, and Society4(1): 81–94.
19.
CallonMLascoumesPBartheY (2001) Agir dans un monde incertain: Essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris: Seuil.
20.
CastellsM (2001) Internet Galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
CollinsHMPinchT (1993) The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
CouzinJ (2006) Stem cells. … and how the problems eluded peer reviewers and editors. Science311: 23–24.
23.
CraneD (1967) The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles of scientific journals. American Sociologist2: 195–201.
24.
CraneD (1972) Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
De GraziaA (1963) The scientific reception system and Dr. Velikovsky. American Behavioral Scientist7: 38–56.
26.
De Solla PriceDJ (1963) Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
DiMaggioPPowellW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48: 147–160.
28.
EpsteinS (1995) The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology, & Human Values20(4): 408–437.
29.
EtzkowitzHWebsterA (1995) Science as intellectual property. In: JasanoffSMarkleGPetersonJC. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 480–505.
30.
FahyDLewensteinB (2014), Scientists in Popular Culture: The Making of Celebrities. In: BucchiMTrenchB (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd ed.London: Routledge, 83–95.
31.
FraserAGDunstanF (2010) On the impossibility of being an expert. British Medical Journal341: 1314–1315.
32.
GallinoL (2007) Tecnologia e democrazia. Conoscenze tecniche e scientifiche come beni pubblici. Torino: Einaudi.
33.
GibbonsMLimogesCNowotnyH. (1994) (eds) The New Production of Knowledge: Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
34.
GoepfertW (2007) The strength of PR and the weakness of science journalism. In: BauerMBucchiM (eds) Journalism, Science and Society. Science Communication between News and Public Relations. London: Routledge, 215–226.
35.
GoodellR (1977) The Visible Scientists. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
36.
GregoryJMillerS (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. London: Plenum.
37.
HackingI (1999) The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
HagstromWO (1965) The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books.
39.
HagstromWO (1982) Gift giving as an organizing principle in science. In: BarnesBEdgeD (eds) Science in Context. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 21–34.
40.
HallR (1963) Merton revisited, or science and society in the seventeenth century. History of ScienceII: 1–16.
41.
HansenA (1992) Journalistic practices and science reporting in the British press. Public Understanding of Science3: 111–134.
42.
Knorr CetinaK (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
43.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
LewensteinB (1992) Cold fusion and hot history. Osiris7: 135–163.
45.
LewinK (1943) Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the National Research Council108: 35–65.
46.
MertonRK (1938) Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England. Bruges: St. Catherine Press (4th edn: with a new introduction. New York: Howard Fertig, 2001).
47.
MertonRK (1968 [1949]) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
48.
MertonRK (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
MertonRK (1973 [1942]) The normative structure of science. In: MertonRK (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 267–278.
50.
MertonRK (1973 [1963]) Multiple discoveries as strategic research site. In: MertonRK (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 371–382.
51.
MertonRKBarberEG (1963) Sociological ambivalence. In: TiryakianEA (ed.) Sociological Theory, Values and Sociocultural Change. Glencoe: The Free Press, 91–120.
52.
MertonRKBarberEG (2004) Travels and Adventures of Serendipity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
MertonRKGarfieldE (1986) Foreword. In: De Solla PriceDJ (ed.) Little Science, Big Science … and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press, vii–xxiii.
54.
MertonRKZuckermanH (1973 [1972]) Age, aging and age structure, in science. In: MertonRK (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
MetlayG (2006) Reconsidering renormalization: Stability and change in 20th-century views on university patents. Social Studies of Science36(4): 565–597.
56.
MillerS (1994) Wrinkles, ripples and fireballs: Cosmology on the front page. Public Understanding of Science3: 445–453.
57.
MitroffI (1974) Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists. American Sociological Review39: 579–595.
58.
MolA (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
59.
MulkayM (1979) Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Allen & Unwin.
60.
MullinsN (1968) The distribution of social and cultural properties in informal communication networks among biological scientists. American Sociological Review33: 786–797.
61.
National Science Foundation (NSF) (2010) S&E indicators 2010. Available at: www.nsf.gov/statistics
62.
NowotnyHScottPGibbonsM (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
63.
PaccagnellaL (2007) Robert K. Merton e il software libero: gli imperativi istituzionali della ricerca scientifica nell’etica hacker. Quaderni di sociologia45(3): 653–680.
64.
PetersHPHeinrichsHJungA. (2008) Medialization of science as a prerequisite for legitimization and political relevance. In: ChengDClaessensMGascoigneT. (eds) Communicating Science in Social Contexts. New York: Springer, 71–92.
65.
PickeringA (1992) (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
66.
PinchT (1992) Puritanism and the rise of modern science (ed CohenIB). Social Forces70: 1132–1133.
67.
PizzornoA (2007) Dalla reputazione alla visibilità. In: PizzornoA (ed.) Il velo della diversità: Studi su razionalità e riconoscimento. Milano: Feltrinelli, 220–247.
68.
PolanyiM (1951) The Logic of Liberty. London: Routledge.
69.
RossiterM (1993) The Matthew Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science23(2): 325–341.
70.
ShilsE (1954) Scientific community: Thoughts after Hamburg. Bulletin of the Atomic ScientistsX(5): 151–155.
71.
StorerN (1973) Introduction. In: MertonRK (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, xi–xxxi.
72.
TönniesF (1887) Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Leipzig: Reislad.
73.
VogelC (2006) Wissenschaft bei einer internationalen Fachzeitschrift II: Journalism at a Magazine-within-a-magazine. In: WormerH (ed.) Die Wissensmacher. Profile und Arbeitsfelder von Wissenschaftsredaktionen in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 314–329.
74.
WareMMabeM (2012) The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. The Hague: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.
75.
WeberM (1905) Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Tübingen: Mohr.
76.
WeberM (1922) Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr.
77.
WohlsenM (2011) Biopunk: DIY scientists hack the software of life. New York: Current.
78.
YoungNSIoannidisJPAAl-UbaydiiO (2008) Why current publication practicesmaydistort science. Plos Medicine5: e201.
79.
ZimanJ (2000) Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
ZuckermanH (1977) Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: The Free Press.
