Although Durkheim founded his sociology on his unique epistemology and his corresponding sociology of knowledge, it is the positivist and structuralist interpretations of his work which have mainly influenced sociology, while the foundational sociology of knowledge has languished. This article explores Durkheim’s sociology of knowledge and the theoretical grounding it offers to contemporary fields of inquiry that are focused on an empirical analysis of practical knowledge and its uses in action, particularly those initiated by Erving Goffman and Harold Garfinkel.
BoudonR (1999) Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: Une théorie toujours vivante. L’année sociologique49(1): 149–198.
3.
BourdieuP (1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
CassirerE (1923) Substance and Function. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
5.
ChauviréC (2004) Complément de sujet, supplément d’âme. Critique: 853–866.
6.
CollinsS (1986) Categories, concepts or predicaments? Remarks on Mauss’s use of philosophical terminology. In: CarrithersMCollinsSLukesS (eds) The Category of the Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–82.
7.
CoulterJ (1991) Logic: Ethnomethodology and the logic of language. In: ButtonG (ed.) Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 20–50.
8.
CzyzewskiM (1994) Reflexivity of actors versus reflexivity of accounts. Theory, Culture & Society11(4): 161–168.
9.
DurkheimE (1953) The determination of social facts. In: DurkheimE (ed.) Sociology and Philosophy. New York: The Free Press (first published in French in 1906), pp. 16–35.
10.
DurkheimE (1966) Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.
11.
DurkheimE (1975) La sociologie et son domaine scientifique. In: KaradyV (ed.) Textes I. Paris: Ed. de Minuit, pp. 13–36.
12.
GarfinkelH (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
GarfinkelH (2006) Seeing Sociologically : the Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. (Orig. pub. 1948)
14.
GarfinkelH (2008) Toward a Sociological Theory of Information (edited and introduced by Anne W. Rawls) Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers (Orig. pub. 1952)
15.
GellnerE (1970) Concepts and society. In: WilsonB (ed.) Rationality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 18–50.
16.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
GoldloveT (1986) Epistemology in Durkheim’s Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Journal for the History of PhilosophyXXIV (4): 385–401.
KarsentiB (2002) Durkheim. Science et philosophie dans la division du travail. In: WagnerP (ed.) Les philosophes et la science. Paris: Gallimard (Folio-Essais), pp. 823–866.
22.
LivetP (2002) Emotions et rationalité morale. Paris: P.U.F.
23.
OgienA (2007) Les formes sociales de la pensée. Paris: Armand Colin.
24.
OgienA (2009a) Intention-in-interaction. In: GrammontFLegrandDLivetP (eds) Naturalizing Intention in Action. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, 247–266.
25.
OgienA (2009b) Rules and details. Journal of Classical Sociology9(4): 450–474.
26.
OgienA (2010) Normativité sociale et normativité neuronale. La découverte de “neurones miroirs” et ses usages en sociologie. Revue française de sociologie51(4): 637–661.
27.
PettitP (1991) Realism and response-dependence. Mind100(4) : 587–626.
28.
PutnamH (1983) Why reason can’t be naturalized. In: PutnamH (ed.) Philosophical Papers, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–247.
29.
RawlsAW (1987) ‘The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman’s Contribution to Social Theory’, Sociological Theory5(3): 136–49.
30.
RawlsAW (1989) Emergent sociality : a dialectic of commitment and order. Symbolic Interaction 1990 13(1) : 63–82
31.
RawlsAW (1996) Durkheim’s epistemology: The neglected argument. American Journal of Sociology102(2): 430–482.
32.
RawlsAW (1998) Durkheim’s challenge to philosophy: Human reason explained as a product of enacted social practice. American Journal of Sociology104(3): 887–901.
33.
RawlsAW (2011) Wittgenstein, Durkheim, Garfinkel and Winch: Constitutive orders of sensemaking. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior: 396–418.
34.
RawlsAW (2002 [1989]) The Mauss Review 19 (French translation of Emergent sociality: A dialectic of commitment and order. Symbolic Interaction199013(1)).
35.
RawlsAW (2004) Epistemology and Practice : Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
SawyerRK (2002) Durkheim’s dilemma: Toward a sociology of emergence. Sociological Theory20(2): 227–248.
37.
SearleJ (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Simon & Schuster.
38.
ShillingC (2005) Embodiment, emotions, and the foundations of social order: Durkheim’s enduring contribution. In: AlexanderJSmithP (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–238.
