This article proposes a reading of Crack Capitalism which evolves around two categories that are conceptually transformed by the book’s author, namely: everyday life and revolutionary subject. The conceptual axis of this transformation is detotalization. As a result, the concepts of revolution and revolutionary subject, linked to that of the production of a new totality in the classic conception, are substituted by the notion of a process which goes against-and-beyond totality: that is, of a struggle for the detotalization of social relations.
BenjaminW (1969 [1940]) Theses on the philosophy of history. In: Illuminations. New York: Schocken, 253–264.
2.
ClarkeS (1991) The state debate. In: ClarkeS (ed.) The State Debate. London: Macmillan, 1–61.
3.
HollowayJ (2008) Negative and positive autonomism. In: HollowayJMatamorosFTischlerS (eds) Negativity and Revolution: Adorno and Political Activism. London: Pluto, 95–100.
4.
HollowayJ (2002) Change the World without Taking Power: The Meaning of Revolution Today. London: Pluto.
5.
HollowayJ (2010) Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto.
6.
LukácsG (1988 [1923]) History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
MarxK (1973 [1857]) Grundrisse. London: Penguin.
8.
OuviñaH (2012) El problema de la neutralidad técnica en el pensamiento político de Lenin. Bajo el Volcán17. Postgraduate Studies in Sociology, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico.
9.
PostoneM (1996) Time, Labour, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
