This paper revisits the classical sociological hypothesis of conservatism, specifically the `Mannheim Hypothesis,' and its bearing on liberty or liberal modernity. The original formulation of the Mannheim Hypothesis posits that conservatism tends to oppose the `principle of liberty' and, hence, liberal modernity or liberalism, defined as its immediate antagonist. This paper presents the Mannheim Hypothesis of conservatism and liberty, as well as its initial general solution by Mannheim and other classical sociologists. Then it attempts to solve this hypothesis by presenting relevant theoretical arguments and supporting empirical evidence. Overall this essay reaffirms the classical sociological solution of the Mannheim Hypothesis of conservatism and liberty in contemporary society.
Archer, Robin (2001) `Secularism and Sectarianism in India and the West: What are the Real Lessons of American History?'Economy and Society30: 273-87.
2.
Bauman, Zygmunt (1997) Postmodernity and Its Discontents. New York: New York University Press.
3.
Beck, Ulrich (2002) `The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies', Theory , Culture and Society19: 17-44.
4.
Bell, Daniel (ed.) (2002) The Radical Right. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
5.
Blinkhorn, Martin (2003) Fascists and Conservatives. London: Taylor & Francis.
6.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998) Acts of Resistance. New York : Free Press.
7.
Dahrendorf, Ralph (1959) Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society . Stanford: Stanford University Press.
8.
Dahrendorf, Ralph (1979) Life Chances. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Delanty, Gerard (2000) `The Foundations of Social Theory: Origins and Trajectories', pp. 21-46 in Bryan Turner (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
10.
Deutsch, Kenneth and Walter Soffer (1987) `Introduction', pp. 1-14 in Kenneth Deutsch and Walter Soffer (eds) The Crisis of Liberal Democracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11.
Dombrowski, Daniel ( 2001) Rawls and Religion. New York : State University of New York Press.
12.
Dunn, Charles and David Woodard (1996) The Conservative Tradition in America. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
13.
Eccleshall, Robert (2000) `The Doing of Conservatism', Journal of Political Ideologies5: 275-87.
14.
Friedland, Roger (2001) `Religious Nationalism and the Problem of Collective Representation', Annual Review of Sociology27: 25-52.
15.
Friedman, Milton and Rose Friedman (1982) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
16.
Giddens, Anthony (1984) The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Goldberg, Chad (2001) `Social Citizenship and a Reconstructed Tocqueville' , American Sociological Review66: 289-315.
18.
Gorski, Philip (2000) `The Mosaic Moment: An Early Modernist Critique of Modernist Theories of Nationalism', American Journal of Sociology105: 1428-68.
19.
Habermas, Jürgen (2001) The Postnational Constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Jacobs, David, Jason Carmichael and Stephanie Kent (2005) `Vigilantism, Current Racial Threat, and Death Sentences', American Sociological Review70: 656-77.
21.
Kettler, David, Volker Meja and Nico Stehr (1984) `Karl Mannheim and Conservatism: The Ancestry of Historical Thinking', American Sociological Review49: 71-85.
22.
Kloppenberg, James (1998) The Virtues of Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Kuran, Timur (2004) `Why the Middle East is Economically Underdeveloped: Historical Mechanisms of Institutional Stagnation', Journal of Economic Perspectives18: 71-90.
24.
Lipset, Seymour (1955) `The Radical Right: A Problem forAmerican Democracy', British Journal of Sociology6: 176-209.
25.
Lipset, Seymour (1996) American Exceptionalism. New York: Norton.
26.
Lipset, Seymour and Gary Marks (2000) It Didn't Happen Here. New York : Norton.
27.
Manent, Pierre (1998) Modern Liberty and Its Discontents. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
28.
Mannheim, Karl (1967) Essays on the Sociology of Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
29.
Mannheim, Karl (1986) Conservatism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30.
Mises, Ludwig von (1966) Human Action. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
31.
Munch, Richard (2001) The Ethics of Modernity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
32.
Nisbet, Robert (1952) `Conservatism and Sociology', American Journal of Sociology58: 167-75.
33.
Nisbet, Robert (1966) The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.
34.
Parsons, Talcott (1965) `Max Weber 1864-1964', American Sociological Review30: 171-5.
35.
Plotke, David (2002) `Introduction', pp. vi-lxxvi in Daniel Bell (ed.) The Radical Right. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
36.
Putnam, Robert (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
37.
Ross, Edward (1896) `Social Control', American Journal of Sociology2: 255-63.
38.
Smelser, Neil (1997) Problematics of Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
Smelser, Neil and Faith Mitchell (2002) Terrorism. Washington: National Academies Press.
40.
Stivers, Richard (1994) The Culture of Cynicism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
41.
Tawney, Richard (1962) Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: Harcourt.
42.
Turk, Austin (2004) `Sociology of Terrorism', Annual Review of Sociology29: 271-86.
43.
Turner, Bryan (2002) `Sovereignty and Emergency: Political Theology, Islam and American Conservatism', Theory, Culture & Society19: 103-19.
44.
Weeber, Stanley and Daniel Rodeheaver (2004) Militias in the New Millennium . Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
45.
Zaret, David (1989) `Religion and the Rise of Liberal-Democratic Ideology in 17th-Century England', American Sociological Review54: 163-79.
