Institutional storylines of gatekeeping: Negotiating research access to hard-to-reach groups involved in child protection

Abstract

Drawing on a video-based study in a child protection context, this article explores the challenges of negotiating research access to hard-to-reach groups. It builds on traditional gatekeeping terminology in methodological discussions by identifying institutional storylines that shape access negotiations with gatekeepers, such as welfare managers and practitioners. Departing from Critical Childhood Studies and applying Positioning Theory, an analysis of the author's field notes reveals multiple institutional storylines shaping negotiations. These include storylines that address different perspectives on young people's vulnerability and need for protection, as well as storylines that reflect the complex working conditions of welfare practitioners, thereby complicating relationship-building with gatekeepers. Moreover, storylines rooted in bureaucratic concerns and formalities shape access negotiations, sometimes concealing deeper forms of resistance. Together, these interconnected institutional storylines create a fragile environment for negotiations. The findings suggest critical methodological implications, showing how institutional storylines shape access negotiations and opportunities for research participation.