Abstract
As our social world is increasingly digitized, what do sociologists gain by rethinking the privileged status of in-person interviews? This paper challenges the presumption that synchronous, Zoom-mediated interviews are second-best substitutes for in-person interview methods. Drawing on data from three qualitative studies (N = 285), we explore how digital interviews and focus groups can foster rapport, generate rich data, and meet qualitative standards of rigor. Using Social Presence Theory, we develop the metaphor of the “pocket-size ethnographer,” a smaller-than-life, two-dimensional research presence that affords unique opportunities for deep listening, reduces power asymmetries, and democratizes conversations. We argue that the diminished “realness” that researchers take on in Zoom-mediated interviews can paradoxically enhance interpretive richness, and we call for a shift from deficit-centered framings of video-mediated interviews to a quality-centric approach that foregrounds methodological flexibility, rigor, and innovation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
