Qualitative inquirers are increasingly exploring the possibilities and promise of web-based research. From re-envisioning the meaning of face-to-face interaction through online collaboration platforms to harvesting organically occurring digital content, these data generation interactions occur on platforms designed for purposes other than inquiry. Researchers who work within these platformed field sites must be clear on the affordances of these imperfect and continually evolving ecosystems. In this article, I engage in a postdigital anti/colonial critique of platforms to outline the contours of their relational-cultural affordances as distinctly colonial and white. From this engagement, I invite a dialogue on the risks researchers take when assuming a platform is universal and, subsequently, our digital research on these platforms are neutral endeavors. I conclude with a series of critically reflexive prompts for researchers to consider when engaging in digital research.
Ananya (2024) AI image generators often give racist and sexist results: can they be fixed?Nature677: 722–725.
3.
BarbosaSMilanS (2019) Do not harm in private chat apps: ethical issues for research on and with WhatsApp. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture14(1): 49–65.
4.
BenjaminR (2019) Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Medford: Polity Press.
5.
BhattacharyaK (2021) De/colonizing educational research. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford, UK: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, pp.1–19. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1386 (accessed 30 March 2023).
BoffoneT (2022) The D’Amelio effect: TikTok, Charli D’Amelio, and the construction of whiteness. In: BoffoneT (ed) TikTok Cultures in the United States. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, pp.17–27.
8.
Bonilla-SilvaE (2006) Racism Without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
9.
BrunsmaDLChapmanNGKimJW, et al. (2020) The culture of white space: On the racialized production of meaning. American Behavioral Scientist64(14): 2001–2015,
10.
BuolamwiniJ (2023) Unmasking AI: My Mission to Protect What is Human in a World of Machines. New York, NY, USA: Random House.
11.
CheekJKoro-LjungbergM (2018) Interfaces between social media and qualitative inquiry in neoliberal contexts: Possibilities and problems. Qualitative Inquiry25(6): 569–570,
12.
ChristouPA (2023) Ηow to use artificial intelligence (AI) as a resource, methodological and analysis tool in qualitative research?The Qualitative Report28(7):1968–1980,
13.
CohenMillerABoivinN (2021) Questions in Qualitative Social Justice Research in Multicultural Contexts. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
14.
ColomA (2021) Using WhatsApp for focus group discussions: ecological validity, inclusion and deliberation. Qualitative Research22(3): 452–467,
15.
Compton-LillyCEllisonTLPerryKH, et al, eds. (2002) Whitewashed Critical Perspectives: Restorying the Edge to Edgy Ideas. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
16.
Corces-ZimmermanCThomasDCollinsEA, et al. (2020) Ontological expansiveness. In: CaseyZA (ed) Encyclopedia of Critical Whiteness Studies in Education. Leiden: Brill, pp. 432–438.
17.
CurranJFentonNFreedmanD (2016) Misunderstanding the Internet. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
18.
DanielsJ (2013). Race and racism in internet studies: A review and critique. New Media & Society, 15(5), 695–719.
19.
DavisAY (2011) Are Prisons Obsolete?New York: Seven Stories Press.
20.
DavisC (2022) Digital blackface and the troubling intimacies of TikTok dance challenges. In: BoffoneT (ed) TikTok Cultures in the United States. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, pp.28–38.
21.
DeiGJSKempfA (2006) Anti-Colonialism and Education: the Politics of Resistance. Leiden: Brill.
DuffyBEChanNK (2019) ‘You never really know who’s looking’: imagined surveillance across social media platforms. New Media & Society21(1): 119–138.
24.
Estrada-JaramilloAMichaelMFarrimondH (2023) Absence, multiplicity and the boundaries of research? Reflections on online asynchronous focus groups. Qualitative Research23(6): 1669–1688.
FeaginJR (2020) The White Racial Frame: Centuries of Racial Framing and Counter-Framing. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
27.
FunkJGuthadjakaK (2020) Indigenous authorship on open and digital platforms: social justice processes and potential. Journal of Interactive Media in Education1(6): 1–13.
28.
GilmoreRW (2007). Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Oakland, CA, USA: University of California Press.
29.
GrayKLSteinK (2021) ‘We “said her name” and got zucked’: Black women calling-out the carceral logics of digital platforms. Gender & Society35(4): 538–545,
30.
GrayMLSuriS (2019) Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley From Building a New Global Underclass. New York, NY, USA: Houston Mifflin Harcourt.
HowlettM (2022) Looking at the “field” through a zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research22(3): 387–402,
JinDYCurranJ (2015) Digital Platforms, Imperialism and Political Culture. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
41.
JordanLS (2022) Unsettling the family sciences: Introducing settler colonial theory through a theoretical analysis of the family and racialized injustice. Journal of Family Theory & Review14(3): 463–481.
42.
JordanLS (2023) Integrating qualitative inquiry and critical whiteness in psychology research methods courses. Teaching of Psychology50(2): 112–118.
KingTL (2019) The Black Shoals: offshore Formations of Black and Native Studies. Durham: Duke University Press.
45.
KnoxJ (2019) What does the “postdigital” mean for education? Three critical perspectives on the digital, with implications for educational research and practice. Postdigital Science and Education1(2): 357–370.
46.
KozinetsR (2019) Netnography: the Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
47.
KwetM (2019) Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South. Race & Class60(4): 3–26,
LeonardoZ (2002) The souls of white folk: critical pedagogy, whiteness studies, and globalization discourse. Race Ethnicity and Education5(1): 29–50.
50.
LeonardoZ (2009) Race, Whiteness, and Education. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
51.
LesterJN (2020) Going digital in ethnography: navigating the ethical tensions and productive possibilities. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies20(5): 414–424,
52.
LeursK (2017) Feminist data studies: Using digital methods for ethical, reflexive and situated socio-cultural research. Feminist Review115(1): 130–154.
53.
MaddoxJMalsonJ (2020) Guidelines without lines, communities without borders: the marketplace of ideas and digital manifest destiny in social media platform policies. Social Media+Society, 6(2): 1–10. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2056305120926622.
54.
MannMDalyA (2019) (Big) data and the north-in-south: Australia’s informational imperialism and digital colonialism. Television & New Media, 20(4): 379–395,
55.
MarxGT (2019) Windows Into the Soul: surveillance and Society in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
Matamoros-FernándezA (2017) Platformed racism: the mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Information, Communication & Society20(6): 930–946,
57.
Matamoros-FernándezAFarkasJ (2021) Racism, hate speech, and social media: a systematic review and critique. Television & New Media22(2): 205–224,
58.
MatiasCEAldernJ (2020) (Un)common white sense: the whiteness behind digital media. Postdigital Science and Education2(2): 330–347,
59.
MatiasCEBoucherC (2021) From critical whiteness studies to a critical study of whiteness: Restoring criticality in critical whiteness studies. Whiteness and Education8(1): 64–81.
60.
McIlwainC (2017) Racial formation, inequality and the political economy of web traffic. Information, Communication & Society20(7): 1073–1089,
61.
MignoloWD (2007) Delinking: the rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies21(2-3): 449–514,
62.
MilanSTreréE (2019) Big data from the south(s): beyond data universalism. Television & New Media20(4): 319–335,
63.
MillsCW (1997) The Racial Contract. Ithaca: cornell University Press.
64.
MillsKA (2018) What are the threats and potentials of big data for qualitative research?Qualitative Research18(6): 591–603,
65.
MisiaszekGWEpstein-HaLeviDYReindlS, et al. (2022) Ecopedagogy disrupting postdigital divides of (neo)coloniality, (eco)racism, and anthropocentricism: a case study. In: JandrićPFordDR (eds) Postdigital Ecopedagogies: Genealogies, Contradictions, and Possible Futures. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 121–145.
66.
MoodleyK (2020) Research imperialism resurfaces in South Africa in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic-this time, via a digital portal. SAMJ: south African Medical Journal110(11): 1068–1069,
67.
MwambariDPurdekováABisokaAN (2022) COVID-19 and research in conflict-affected contexts: distanced methods and the digitalisation of suffering. Qualitative Research22(6): 969–978,
68.
NakamuraL (2013) Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
69.
NayakA (2016) Race, Place and Globalization: youth Cultures in a Changing World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
70.
NobleSU (2018) Algorithms of Oppression. New York, NY, USA: University Press.
71.
OparaVSpangsdorfSRyanMK (2021) Reflecting on the use of Google Docs for online interviews: Innovation in qualitative data collection. Qualitative Research23(3): 561–578.
72.
Owoahene AcheampongKNyaabaM (2024) Review of qualitative research in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4686920
73.
ParkerJLRichardVMBeckerK (2023) Guidelines for the integration of large language models in developing and refining interview protocols. The Qualitative Report28(12): 3460–3474,
74.
PaulusTMJacksonKDavidsonJ (2017) Digital tools for qualitative research: disruptions and entanglements. Qualitative Inquiry23(10): 751–756.
75.
PaulusTMLesterJN (2021) Doing Qualitative Research in a Digital World. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
76.
PearceWÖzkulaSMGreeneAK, et al. (2020) Visual cross-platform analysis: digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society23(2): 161–180,
77.
PetersMABesleyT (2019) Critical philosophy of the postdigital. Postdigital Science and Education1: 29–42.
RahmanSATuckermanLVorleyT, et al. (2021) Resilient research in the field: insights and lessons from adapting qualitative research projects during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Qualitative Methods20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211016106.
80.
RobertsST (2019) Behind the Screen. Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media. New Haven: Yale University Press.
81.
SmithLT (2021). Decolonizing Methodologies: research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
82.
SteinbergMLiJ (2017) Introduction: regional platforms. Asiascape: Digital Asia4(3): 173–183.
83.
Stone-MediatoreS (2019) How America disguises its violence: Colonialism, mass incarceration, and the need for resistant imagination. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy22(5): 542–561,
84.
SullivanS (2006) Revealing Whiteness: the Unconscious Habits of Racial Privilege. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
TavakoliRMuraP (2018) Netnography in tourism—Beyond web 2.0. Annals of Tourism Research73(C): 190–192,
87.
TiidenbergK (2018) Ethics in digital research. In: FlickU (ed) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 466–479.
88.
TuckEMcKenzieM (2014) Place in Research: theory, Methodology, and Methods. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
89.
VeraciniL (2010) Settler Colonialism: a Theoretical Overview. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
90.
VorsinoZ (2021) Chatbots, gender, and race on web 2.0 platforms: tay. AI as monstrous femininity and abject whiteness. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society47(1): 105–127,
91.
WeissmanJ (2021) The Crowdsourced Panopticon: conformity and Control on Social Media. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
92.
WeltevredeEBorraE (2016) Platform affordances and data practices: the value of dispute on Wikipedia. Big Data & Society3(1): 1–16.
93.
WillemsW (2021) Beyond platform-centrism and digital universalism: the relational affordances of mobile social media publics. Information, Communication & Society24(12): 1677–1693.
