Turning the tables or business as usual? COVID-19 as a catalyst in North

Abstract

Since February 2020, we have witnessed COVID-19 profoundly disturb ongoing research dynamics – including research collaborations between the Global North and the Global South. Reduced international and regional mobility obliged research collaborations to reinvent their modalities. The role of field-based researchers (those physically ‘there’) has never been more crucial. This article draws on the testimonies of researchers from the African Great Lakes region to reflect on the positionality of field-based researchers in North–South research collaborations throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Their embeddedness in the field foregrounded their complementary strengths in interactions with scholars from the Global North. We also illustrate how vulnerabilities – both unstable employment and field-related risks – were unevenly shared by partners in the Global South and the Global North. In conclusion, the COVID-19 experience inspired us to adhere to new collaboration modalities that move beyond post-colonial dynamics in North–South research collaborations.

Keywords

COVID19 research ethics decolonisation of knowledge production Great Lakes of Africa North–South research collaborations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abidin

De Seta

(2020) Private messages from the field: confessions on digital ethnography and its discomforts. Journal of Digital Social Research 2(1): 1–19.

Adenaike

Vansina

(eds) (1996) In Pursuit of History: Fieldwork in Africa. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

Alom Bartoli

(2018) Les stratégies d’acteurs dans les collaborations scientifiques avec le Sud. Chercheurs et agences de financement dans les sciences sociales . Thèse de doctorat en sociologie, Université Paris Descartes, France.

Anderson

(2002) Introduction: postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science. 32(5–6): 643–658.

Ansoms

Nyenyezi

Thomson

. (éds.) (2021) Field Research in Africa: The Ethics of Researcher Vulnerabilities. Oxford: James Currey.

Barré

Chabbal

(1996) Les coopérations scientifiques Nord-Sud: caractérisation et dynamique d’ensemble. In: Moulin

Waast

(eds) Les sciences hors d’Occident au XX^ème siècle. Colloque Paris: Orstom, 25–38.

Bashizi

Ansoms

Adili Amani

, et al. (2021) Real governance of the COVID-19 crisis in the Great Lakes Region of Africa. Journal of Eastern African Studies 15(2): 190–213.

Baud

(2002) North-South research partnerships: an institutions approach. In: Bouma

Opschoor

(eds) North-South Research Co-operation: Comprehensives Approach to Development and Innovation. Amsterdam: KNAW, 51–90.

Bhambra

Bouka

Persaud

, et al. (2020) Why is mainstream international relations blind to racism? Ignoring the central role of race and colonialism in world affairs precludes an accurate understanding of the modern state system. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/07/03/why-is-mainstream-international-relations-ir-blind-to-racism-colonialism/ (accessed 20 October 2022).

10.

Bouka

(2018) Collaborative research as structural violence. Blog post in Political Violence@ a Glance. https://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2018/07/12/collaborative-research-as-structural-violence (accessed 20 October 2022).

11.

Bradley

(2007), North-south research partnerships: challenges, responses and trends—a literature review and annotated bibliography. Working Paper 1, IDRC Canadian Partnerships Working Paper Series. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 1–66.

12.

Briggs

Weathers

(2016) Gender and location in African politics scholarship: the other white man's burden? African Affairs 115 (460): 466–489; a correction was published in 2018. African Affairs 117(466): 168–169.

13.

Carbonnier

Kontinen

(2015) Institutional learning in north-south research partnerships. Revue Tiers Monde 1(221): 149–162.

14.

CNUCED. (2020) Global Investment Trends. Genève: CNUCED.

15.

Cole

Knowles

(1993) Teacher development partnership research: a focus on methods and issues. American Education Research Journal. 30(3): 473–495.

16.

Deakin

Wakefield

(2014) Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers.

17.

De la Rive Box

(2001) To and Fro: International Cooperation in Research and Research on International Cooperation. Maastricht: University of Maastricht. Available at: (accessed 20 October 2022).

18.

Droz

Mayor

(eds) (2009) Partenariats scientifiques avec l’Afrique. Réflexions critiques de Suisse et d’ailleurs. Paris: Karthala.

19.

Engelhard

Box

(1999) Making north-south research networks work: a contribution to the work on a common vision for the future e of science and technology for development by the United Nations Commission for Science and Technology, UNCTAD, online at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/405063 (accessed 25 May 2023).

20.

Fielding

Lee

Blank

(2008) The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.

21.

Fujii

(2017) Interviewing in Social Science Research: A Relational Approach. New York: Routledge.

22.

Gaillard

(1996) les collaborations scientifiques Nord-Sud: un examen critique de huit programme d’aide à la recherche. In : Moulin

Waast

(eds) Les sciences hors d’Occident au XXème siècle. Colloque Paris: Orstom, 219–253.

23.

Gunasekara

(2020) (Un)packing baggage: a reflection on the ‘battle over Ideas’ and labour hierarchies in collaborative north–south research. Europena Journal for Development Research 32: 503–513.

24.

Happi

Nkengasong

(2022) Two years of COVID-19 in Africa: lessons for the world. Nature 601: 22–25.

25.

Hine

(2005) Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg.

26.

Howlett

(2021) Looking at the ‘field’ through a zoom lens: methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research 22: 387–402.

27.

Jenner

Myers

(2018) Intimacy, rapport, and exceptional disclosure: a comparison on in-person and mediated interview contexts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22(2): 165–177.

28.

Jentsch

(2004) Making southern realities count: research agendas and design in north-south collaborations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7(3): 259–269.

29.

Jentsch

Pilley

(2003) Research relationships between the south and the north: Cinderella and the ugly sisters? Social Science & Medicine. 57 (10): 1957–1967.

30.

Johnson

Scheitle

Ecklund

(2019) Beyond the In-Person Interview? How Interview Quality Varies across In-Person, Telephone, and Skype Interviews. Social Science Computer Review 39(6): 1142–1158.

31.

Jowett

Peel

Shaw

(2011) Online interviewing in psychology: reflections on the process. Qualitative Research in Psychology 8(4): 354–369.

32.

Lee-Treweek

Linkogle

(eds) (2000) Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research. Londres: Routledge.

33.

Legrand

Gutron

(2016) Éprouver l’altérité: Les défis de l’enquête de terrain. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaire de Louvain.

34.

Maina-Ahlberg

Nordberg

Tomson

(1997) North-South health research collaboration: challenges in institutional interaction. Social Science and Medicine. 44(8): 1229–1238.

35.

McKenzie

(2019) Ethnographier un projet de recherche nord-sud. Entre différences épistémologiques, enjeux éthiques et rapports de pouvoir. Revue D'anthropologie des Connaissances 13(2): 425–454.

36.

Monson

(2020) Ethics of transregional research and the COVID-19 pandemic. Covid-19 in Africa. Blog series of the Social Science Research Council. https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/social-research-and-insecurity/ethics-of-transregional-research-and-the-covid-19-pandemic/ (accessed 20 October 2022).

37.

Mwambari

(2019) Local positionality in the production of knowledge in northern Uganda. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 1–12.

38.

Mwambari

Ahmed

Barak

(2022) The impact of open access on knowledge production, consumption and dissemination in Kenya’s higher education system. Third World Quarterly 43(6): 1–17.

39.

Mwambari

Owor

(2019) The black market of knowledge production. Governance in conflict network - silent voices series. https://www.gicnetwork.be/the-black-market-of-knowledge-production/ (accessed on 20 October 2022).

40.

Mwambari

Purdeková

Bisoka

(2022B) Covid-19 and research in conflict-affected contexts: distanced methods and the digitalisation of suffering. Qualitative Research 22(6): 969–978.

41.

Nordstrom

Robben

(eds) (1995) Fieldwork under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.

42.

Nyenyezi

(2020) Disturbing the aesthetics of power: why COVID-19 is not an “event” for fieldwork-based social scientists. Covid and the social sciences. Blog series of the Social Science Research Council. https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/social-research-and-insecurity/disturbing-the-aesthetics-of-power-why-covid-19-is-not-an-event-for-fieldwork-based-social-scientists/ (accessed 20 October 2022).

43.

Nyenyezi

Ansoms

Vlassenroot

, et al. (2020) The Bukavu Series: Toward a Decolonisation of Research. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.

44.

Nyenyezi

Vlassenroot

Ramazani

(2021) What explains popular resistance to Ebola humanitarian responses in the DRC? London School of Economics blog series. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2021/06/11/what-explains-popular-resistance-to-ebola-humanitarian-responses-drc-congo/ (accessed 20 October 2022).

45.

Ogden

Porter

(2000) The politics of partnership in tropical health: researching tuberculosis control in India. Social Policy and Administration 34(4): 377–391.

46.

Okech

Mwambari

Olonisakin

(2021) COVID-19 responses and human rights in selected African countries. Australian Journal of Human Rights 26(3): 549–555.

47.

Olivier De Sardan JP (2008) La rigueur du qualitatif. Les contraintes empiriques de l'interprétation socio-anthropologique. Louvain-la-Neuve, Academia-Bruylant, 368p.

48.

Pailey

(2020) Africa does not need saving during this pandemic. Al Jazeera. 13 April 2020. https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/africa-saving-pandemic-200408180254152.html (accessed 20 October 2022).

49.

Parker

Kingori

(2016) Good and bad research collaborations: researchers’ views on science and ethics. Global Health Research. PLoS ONE 11(10): e0163579.

50.

Patel

(2001) International collaboration in social science research: lessons from IDPAD. Economic and Political Weekly. 37(3). https://www.academia.edu/63160829/International_Collaboration_in_Social_Science_Research (accessed 20 October 2022).

51.

Sanford

Angel-Ajani

(eds) (2006) Engaged Observer: Anthropology, Advocacy, and Activism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

52.

Schatz

de Volo

(2004) From the inside out: ethnographic methods in political research. Political Science and Politics. 37(2): 267–271.

53.

Smulyan

(1987) Collaboration action research: acritical analysis. Peabody Journal of Education 64(3): 57–70.

54.

Thomson

Ansoms

Murison

(eds) (2012) Emotional and Ethical Challenges for Field Research in Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

55.

UNECA (2020) Coronovirus. La CEA estime des milliards de pertes en Afrique en raison de l’impact du COVID-19. Afrique Renouveau. 16 mars 2020. https://www.un.org/africarenewal/news/coronavirus/eca-estimates-billions-worth-losses-africa-due-COVID-19-impact (accessed 20 October 2022).

56.

United Nations Commission for Science and Technology for Development (1999) Making North-South Research Networks Work: A Contribution to the Work on A Common Vision for the Future of Science and Technology for Development. Geneva: UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/poiteedsd7.en.pdf (accessed 20 October 2022).

57.

Vidal

(ed) (2017) Expériences du partenariat au Sud: le regard des sciences sociales. Marseille: IRD Éditions.

58.

Vogel

Musamba

(2022) Towards a politics of collaborative worldmaking: ethics, epistemologies and mutual positionalities in conflict research. Ethnography. Accessed 20 October 2022.0(0): 1–21.

59.

Wall

CRL

Mollinga

(eds) (2008) Fieldwork in Difficult Environments: Methodology as Boundary Work in Development Research. Vienne: LIT.

60.

White

(2020) A space for unlearning? A relational perspective on north–south development research. European Journal for Development Research 32: 483–502.

61.

Wood

Rogers

Sivaramakrishnan

, et al. (2020) Resuming field research in pandemic times. Covid and the social sciences. Blog series of the Social Science Research Council. https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/social-research-and-insecurity/resuming-field-research-in-pandemic-times/ (accessed 20 October 2022).

Turning the tables or business as usual? COVID-19 as a catalyst in North–South research collaborations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References