In this article, we offer insights derived from an analysis of a structured dialogue on methodological decision making. Our analysis highlights the ways in which our dialogic process for revising a manuscript reflected key onto-epistemic qualities of Black women's ways of knowing. Drawing from an Afrocentric feminist epistemological standpoint, we tease apart how shared ways of knowing can facilitate heightened clarity about one's engagement in the research process. By positioning structured dialogues as a methodological tool, we offer several insights regarding their generative nature in facilitating researcher clarity on methodological decision making and in elucidating key shifts in the evolution of a researcher's methodological self. Indeed, as a form of facilitated reflexive praxis, engaging in structure dialogues about one's methodological choices is requisite for defining and understanding oneself as a researcher, scholar, and intellectual.
Banks-WallaceJ (2000) Womanist ways of knowing: theoretical considerations for research with African American women. Advances in Nursing Science22(3): 33–45.
2.
BellDA (1987) And We are Not Saved: The Elusive Quest for Racial Justice. New York: Basic Books.
3.
BellDA (1992) Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism. New York: Basic Books.
4.
BellDA (1995) Who's afraid of critical race theory. University of Illinois Law Review4: 893–907.
5.
CalmoreJO (1995) Critical race theory, Archie Shepp, and fire music: Securing an authentic intellectual life in a multicultural world. In: CrenshawKGotandaNPellerGThomasK (eds) Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc, 315–328.
6.
CollinsPH (1986) Learning from the outsider within: the sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems33(6): 14–32.
7.
CollinsPH (1989) The social construction of Black feminist thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society14(4): 745–773.
8.
CollinsPH (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
CollinsPH (2015) No guarantees: symposium on Black feminist thought. Ethnic and Racial Studies38(13): 2349–2354.
10.
ConstantinoTE (2008) Dialogue. In: GivenL (ed) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 212–213.
11.
Cook DA (2013) Blurring the boundaries: The mechanics of creating composite characters. In: LynnMDixsonAD (eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education. New York: Routledge, 181–194.
12.
Cook DA and Bryan M (2022) Blurring boundaries: The creation of composite characters in critical race storytelling. In: LynnMDixsonAD (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (2nd ed). New York: Routledge, 251–267.
13.
CrenshawKGotandaNPellerG, et al. (1993) Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement (1995). New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
14.
DelgadoR (1992) Rodrigo's Chronicle. The Yale Law Journal101(6): 1357–1383.
15.
DelgadoR (1995) The Rodrigo Chronicles: Conversations about America and Race. New York: NYU Press.
16.
DillardCB (2012) Learning to (re) Member the Things We've Learned to Forget: Endarkened Feminisms, Spirituality, and the Sacred Nature of Research and Teaching. New York: Peter Lang.
17.
DillardCB (2016) Turning the ships around: a case study of (re)membering as transnational endarkened feminist inquiry and praxis for Black teachers. Educational Studies52(5): 406–423.
18.
DixsonADRousseauCK (2005) And we are still not saved: critical race theory in education ten sources later. Race, Ethnicity, and Education8(1): 7–27.
19.
EnderT (2019) Counter-narratives as resistance: creating critical social studies spaces with communities. The Journal of Social Studies Research43(2): 133–143.
20.
GildersleeveREKuntzAM (2011) A dialogue on space and method in qualitative research on education. Qualitative Inquiry17(1): 15–22.
hooksB (2000) Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto Press.
23.
hooksbWestC (1991) Breaking Bread: Insurgent Black Intellectual Life. Boston, MA: South End Press.
24.
JohnstonEBurleighCWilsonA (2020) Interdisciplinary collaborative research for professional academic development in higher education. Higher Learning Research Communications10(1): 62–77.
25.
LawrenceCRIII (1995) The word and the river: Pedagogy as scholarship as struggle. In: CrenshawKGotandaNPellerG, et al (eds) Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc, 336–351.
26.
LedesmaMCCalderónD (2015) Critical race theory in education: a review of past literature and a look to the future. Qualitative Inquiry21(3): 206–222.
27.
LynnMParkerL (2006) Critical race studies in education: examining a decade of research on U.S. Schools. The Urban Review38(4): 257–290.
28.
MacInnisCPortelliJP (2002) Dialogue as research. Journal of Thought37(2): 33–44.
29.
Mcclunie-TrustPJonesVWinningtonR, et al. (2022) Doing case study research collaboratively: the benefits for researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221096296.
30.
OnwuegbuzieAJLeechNLCollinsKM (2008) Interviewing the interpretive researcher: a method for addressing the crises of representation, legitimation, and praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods7(4): 1–17.
31.
SchwandtTA (1997) Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
SolórzanoDGBernalDD (2001) Examining transformational resistance through a critical race and LatCrit theory framework: Chicana and Chicano students in an urban context. Urban Education36(3): 308–342.
33.
SolórzanoDGHuberLP (2020) Racial Microaggressions: Using Critical Race Theory to Respond to Everyday Racism. New York: Teachers College Press.
34.
SolórzanoDGYossoTJ (2002) Critical race methodology: counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry8(1): 23–44.
35.
TafariDN (2018) Whose world is this?’ A composite counterstory of Black male elementary school teachers as hip-hop otherfathers. The Urban Review50(5): 795–817.
36.
TateWF (1994) From inner city to ivory tower does my voice matter in the academy?Urban Education29(3): 245–269.
