The growth of relational, participatory, collaborative and emergent research approaches in recent years has brought new ethical challenges for research with children and youth. These approaches require greater consideration of the specific social and cultural contexts of the research, along with the greater emphasis on researcher–participant relationships that often occur over sustained periods of time. Very few tools are available to help researchers think through the everyday ethical dilemmas such research can raise. In this article, we review the theoretical underpinnings of feminist and indigenous research methodologies that have encouraged these emerging approaches. Through examining an 18-month Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) project case study, we critically review ethical moments relating to negotiating consent over a sustained period of time, enhancing co-design and navigating power issues between adult and youth researchers. We conclude with a number of questions to ‘think with’ when reflecting on ethical research with children and youth.
AbebeTBessellS (2014) Advancing ethical research with children: critical reflections on ethical guidelines. Children's Geographies12(1): 126–133.
2.
AddlesonK (1991) Impure Thoughts: Essays on Philosophy, Feminism and Ethics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
3.
AndersonJJonesK (2009) The difference that place makes to methodology: Uncovering the 'lived space' of young people's spatial practices. Children's Geographies7(3): 291–303.
4.
BanksSArmstrongACarterK, et al. (2013) Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. Contemporary Social Science8(3): 263–277.
5.
BaumFMacDougallCSmithD (2006) Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health60(10): 854–857.
6.
BrayboyB MGoughH RLeonardB, et al. (2012) Reclaiming scholarship: critical Indigenous research methodologies. In: LapanSQuartaroliMReimerF (eds) Qualitative Research: An Introduction to Methods and Designs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 423–450.
7.
BrannellyT (2018) An ethics of care research manifesto. International Journal of Care and Caring2(3): 367–378. DOI: 10.1332/239788218X15351944886756.
8.
BrannellyTBoultonA (2017) The ethics of care and transformational research practices in Aotearoa New Zealand. Qualitative Research17(3): 340–350.
9.
BrinkmannSKvaleS (2005) Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology18(2): 157–181.
10.
BoultonA (2020) Implementing indigenous research ethics at the interface. In: GeorgeLTauriJMacDonaldLTAoT (eds) Indigenous Research Ethics: Claiming Research Sovereignty Beyond Deficit and the Colonial Legacy. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, Vol. 6, 163–175. Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity DOI: 10.1108/S2398-601820200000006011.
11.
BourkeRLoverigeJ (2014) Exploring informed consent and dissent through children’s participation in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education37(2): 151–165. DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2013.817551.
12.
CahillC (2007) Repositioning ethical commitments: participatory action research as a relational praxis of social change. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies6(3): 360–373.
13.
CahillC (2019) Theorizing youth participation. In: SkeltonTAitkenS (eds) Establishing Geographies of Children and Young People. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 1–34.
14.
CaineVChungSSteevesP, et al. (2020) The necessity of a relational ethics alongside Noddings’ ethics of care in narrative inquiry. Qualitative Research20(3): 265–276.
15.
CarterSMLittleM (2007) Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research17(10): 1316–1328. DOI: 10.1177/1049732307306927.
16.
CascioMARacineE (2018) Person-oriented research ethics: integrating relational and everyday ethics in research. Accountability in Research25(3): 170–197. DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1442218.
17.
Cook-SatherA (2007) Translating researchers: Re-imaging the work of investigating students’ experiences in school. In: ThiessenDCook-SatherA (eds) International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School. The Netherlands: Springer, 829–872.
18.
CullenOWalshC A (2020) A narrative review of ethical issues in participatory research with young people. Young28(4): 363–386.
19.
DattaR (2018) Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research. Research Ethics14(2): 1–24.
20.
DixonDMarstonS (2011) Introduction: feminist engagements with geopolitics. Gender, Place and Culture18(4): 445–453.
21.
Davis-RaeE (2021) Creating a Relational Participatory Space: Insights from a Youth Participatory Action Research Project (MEd). Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka.
22.
FieldingM (2001) Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change2(2): 123–141.
23.
FieldingM (2011) Patterns of partnership: Intergenerational learning and democratic fellowship. In: MockerNSachsJ (eds) Essays in Honour of Susan Groundwater-Smith. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
24.
FoucaultM (1980) Power Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
25.
FreireP (1973) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London, UK: Penguin Books.
26.
GallagherM (2014) Informed consent in research with young children: Consensus, critique and contextual negotiation. In: SarachoO (ed) Handbook of research methods in early childhood education volume 2: Review of research methodologies Vol II. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc., 710–743.
27.
GeorgeL (2020) The ethics of research and indigenous peoples: closing borders and opening doors. In: IphofenR (ed) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Switzerland: Springern Nature Switzerland, 676–689. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2.
28.
GilliganC (1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
GilliganC (2008) Moral orientation and moreal development. In: BaileyACuomoC (eds) The Feminist Philosophy Reader. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 465–478.
30.
GrantBGiddingsL (2002) Making sense of methodologies: a paradigm framework for the novice researcher. Contemporary Nursing13: 10–28.
31.
GuilleminMGillamL (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry10: 261–280.
HoughtonC (2015) Young people's perspectives on participatory ethics: agency, power and impact in domestic abuse research and policy-making. Child Abuse Review24(4): 235–248.
34.
HudsonMMilneMRussellK, et al. (2016) The development of guidelines for indigenous research ethics in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In: DruggeAL (ed) Ethics in Indigenous Research, Past Experiences – Future Challenges. Umea, Sweden. Vaartoe Centre for Sami Research, Umea University, 157–174.
35.
JamesAJenksACProutA (1998) Theorizing Childhood. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36.
KhanlouNPeterE (2005) Participatory action research: considerations for ethical review. Social Science & Medicine60(10): 2333–2340.
37.
KirschG (1999) Ethical Dilemmas in Feminist Research: The Politics of Location, Interpretation, and Publication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
38.
LawsonV (2007) Geographies of care and responsibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers97(1): 1–11.
MacfarlaneAWebberMCookson-CoxC, et al. (2014) Ka Awatea: An Iwi Case Study of Māori Students’ Success. Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland. Retrieved fromhttp://www.maramatanga.co.nz/projects_publications.
41.
NairnKShowdenC RSligoJ, et al. (2020) Consent requires a relationship: rethinking group consent and its timing in ethnographic research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology23(6): 719–731.
42.
PartonN (2003) Rethinking professional practice: the contributions of social constructionism and the feminist ‘ethics of care. The British Journal of Social Work33(1): 1–16.
43.
PidgeonM (2019) Moving between theory and practice with an indigenous research paradigm. Qualitative Research19(4): 418–436.
44.
RubinBAyalaJZaalM (2017) Authenticity, aims and authority: navigating youth participatory action research in the classroom. Curriculum Inquiry47(2): 175–194.
45.
SmithGH (2003, December 2003) Kaupapa Māori theory: theorizing indigenous transformation of education and schooling. Conference Proceedings Kaupapa Māori Symposium. Auckland: NZARE/AARE Joint Conference. Retreived fromhttps://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2003/pih03342.pdf
46.
SmithGHHoskinsTKJonesA (2012) Interview: Kaupapa Māori: the dangers of domestication. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies47(2): 10–20.
47.
SmithLT (1999) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous People. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.
48.
SmithLT (2005) On tricky ground: researching the Native in the age of uncertainty. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California, US: Sage Publications Ltd, 85–107.
49.
TaiwhatiMToiaRTe MaroP, et al. (2010) Takina te Kawa - Laying the foundation: a research engagement methodology in Aotearoa New Zealand. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education39: 110–117.
50.
TolichMFitzgeraldM H (2006) If ethics committees were designed for ethnography. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal1(2): 71–78.
51.
TorreMFineM (2006) Participatory action research (PAR) by youth. In: SherrodL (ed) Youth Activism: An International Encyclopedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Vol. 1, 456–464.
52.
TrontoJ (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child (20 November, 1989), United Nations, treaty series (vol. 1577, p. 3). Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html (accessed 28 February 2022).
54.
West-McGruerK (2020) There’s ‘consent’ and then there’s consent: mobilising Māori and Indigenous research ethics to problematise the western biomedical model. Journal of Sociology56(2): 184–196.
55.
WilsonEKennyADickson-SwiftV (2018) Ethical challenges of community based participatory research: exploring researchers’ experience. International Journal of Social Research Methodology21(1): 7–24.
