In this reflexive essay, I raise issues about power dynamics between interviewers and interviewees based on my experiences conducting research interviews in South Korea. I focus on the sociocultural contexts that drive social agents’ behaviors in the interview process, which in Korean Confucian contexts include respect for adults and educational fervor. A particular configuration of authority relationships was evident in each scenario, showing how sociocultural contexts underlie the complicated power dynamics of interview situations, which can be further complicated by topics that require participants to share their intellectual notions. Based on my interview experiences, I argue that acknowledging these social contexts and their impacts on power relations will serve to strengthen the depth of engagement in interviews and therefore the quality and potential impact of qualitative interview research.
ArendellT (1997) Reflections on the researcher-researched relationship: a woman interviewing men. Qualitative Sociology20(3): 341–368.
2.
BartonKC (2015) Elicitation techniques: getting people to talk about things they don’t usually talk about. Theory and Research in Social Education43(2): 179–205.
3.
BergerR (2015) Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research15(2): 219–234.
4.
BrinkmanSKvaleS (2005) Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology18(2): 157–181.
5.
DeutschCP (1981) The behavioral scientist: insider and outsider. Journal of Social Issues37(2): 172–191.
6.
DeVaultMGrossG (2012) Feminist qualitative interviewing: experiences, talk, and knowledge. In: Hesse-BiberSN (ed) The Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. Los Angeles: Sage, 206–236.
7.
DunbarCJr.RodriquezDParkerL (2002) Race, subjectivity, and the interview process. In: GubriumJFHolsteinJA (eds) Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 239–258.
8.
DwyerSBuckleJ (2009). The space between: on being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods8(1): 54–63.
9.
FaircloughN (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
10.
GangaDScottS (2006) Cultural “insiders” and the issues of positionality in qualitative migration research: moving “across” and moving “along” researcher-participant divides. Forum: Qualitative Social Research7(3): 1–9.
11.
HammarstromAAlexL (2007) Shift in power during an interview situation: methodological reflections inspired by Foucault and Bourdieu. Journal of Nursing Inquiry15(2): 169–176.
12.
HasegawaKShinoharaCBroadbentJP (2007) The effects of “social expectation” on the development of civil society in Japan. Journal of Civil Society3(2): 179–203.
13.
HofstedeG (1986) Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intellectual Relations10(3): 301–320.
14.
HutchinsonSWilsonSK (1992) Validity threats in scheduled semi-structured research interviews. Nursing Research41(2): 117–119.
15.
HwangKK (2012) Foundations of Chinese Psychology: Confucian Social Relations. New York: Springer.
16.
Johnson-BaileyJ (2004) Enjoining positionality and power in narrative work: Balancing contentious and modulating forces. In: deMarraisKLapanSD (eds) Foundations for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge, 139–154.
17.
JosselsonR (2013) Interviewing for Qualitative Inquiry: A Relational Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
18.
Karnieli-MillerOStrierRPessachL (2009) Power relations in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Health Research19(2): 279–289.
19.
KatyalKRKingME (2014) Non-Chinese researchers conducting research in Chinese cultures: critical reflections. International Journal of Research and Method in Education37(1): 44–62.
20.
KimJ (2012) The birth of academic subalterns: how do foreign students embody the global hegemony of American universities?Journal of Studies in International Education16(5): 456–477.
21.
KvaleS (2006) Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Journal of Qualitative Inquiry12(3): 480–500.
22.
LagesenVA (2010) The importance of boundary objects in transcultural interviewing. European Journal of Women’s Studies17(2): 125–142.
23.
LatherP (1991) Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/in the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.
24.
LimerickBBurgess-LimerickTGraceM (1996) The politics of interviewing: power relations and accepting the gift. Qualitative Studies in Education9(4): 449–460.
25.
LukesS (1974) Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
26.
MacDonaldDS (1988) The Koreans: Contemporary Politics and Society. Boulder: Westview Press.
27.
MerriamSBJohnson-BaileyJLeeM-Y, et al. (2001) Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education20(5): 405–416.
28.
MischlerEG (1986) Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
29.
MoonBJKooJW (2011) Global citizenship and human rights: a longitudinal analysis of social studies and ethics in Republic of Korea. Comparative Education Review55(4): 574–599.
30.
NealS (1995) Researching powerful people from a feminist and anti-racist perspective: a note on gender, collusion and marginality. British Educational Research Journal21(4): 517–531.
31.
PaikSJ (2001) Introduction, background, and international perspectives: Korean history, culture, and education. International Journal of Educational Research35(6): 535–607.
32.
PiniB (2005) Interviewing men: gender and the collection and interpretation of qualitative data. Journal of Sociology41(2): 201–216.
33.
PosnerGJGertzogWA (1982) The clinical interview and the measurement of conceptual change. Science Education66(2): 195–209.
34.
RiessmanCK (1991) When gender is not enough: women interviewing women. In: LorberJFarrellSA (eds) The Social Construction of Gender. London: Sage, 217–236.
RosemontH (1991) Rights-bearing individuals and role-bearing persons. In: BockoverMI (ed) Rules, Rituals, and Responsibility. Chicago: Open Court, 71–101.
37.
RossmanGBRallisSF (2017) An Introduction to Qualitative Research: Learning in the Field. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
38.
RumelhartDE (1980) Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In: SpiroRJBruceBCBrewerWF (eds) Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 33–58.
39.
RussRSLeeVRSherinBL (2012) Framing in cognitive clinical interviews about intuitive science knowledge: dynamic student understandings of the discourse interaction. Science Education96(4): 573–599.
40.
SaljoRWyndhamnJ (1993) Solving everyday problems in the formal setting: an empirical study of the school as context for thought. In: ChaiklinSLaveJ (eds) Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 327–342.
41.
ScheurichJ (1997) Research Method in the Postmodern. London: Falmer Press.
42.
SchwalbeMWolkomirM (2003) Interviewing men. In: HolsteinJGubriumJF (eds) Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 55–71.
43.
ShahS (2004) The researcher/interviewer in intercultural context: a social intruder!. British Educational Research Journal30(4): 549–570.
44.
ShimS (2008) A philosophical investigation of the role of teachers: a synthesis of Plato, Confucius, Buber, and Freire. Teaching and Teacher Education24: 515–535.
45.
SmithEK (2005) Problematising power relations in “elite” interviews. Geoforum37(4): 643–653.
46.
SpradleyJP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
47.
StacyJ (2009) The guide on the stage: in defense of good lecturing in the history classroom. Social Education73(6): 275–278.
48.
StanleyLWiseS (1983) Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
49.
SungKTKimHS (2003) Elder respect among young adults: exploration of behavioral forms in Korea. Ageing International28(3): 249–294.
50.
TannenDWallatC (1993) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: examples from a medical examination/interview. In: TannenD (ed) Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 57–76.
51.
ThornborrowJ (2002) Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Harlow: Longman.
52.
VincentCWarrenS (2001) “This won’t take long . . .”: interviewing, ethics, and diversity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education14(1): 39–53.
53.
WangJ (2006) Questions and the exercise of power. Discourse and Society17(4): 529–548.
54.
WangJYanY (2012) The interview questions. In: GubriumJFHolsteinJAMarvastiAB (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 231–242.
