This article will explore the methodologies employed in a collaborative research project on lived experience of exercise or denial of legal capacity, known as the Voices of Individuals: Collectively Exploring Self-determination (VOICES) project. In so doing, the project’s research team will reflect on key decisions about the project’s background, design, implementation (including the recruitment and selection of participants, workshops and editing contributions) and considerations for further research.
BarnesC (2003) What a difference a decade makes: reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research. Disability & Society18(1): 3–17.
2.
BigbyCFrawleyP (2010) Reflections on doing inclusive research in the “Making Life Good in the Community” study. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability35(2): 53–61.
3.
CloatreEEnrightM (2017) Commentary on McGee v. AG. In: EnrightMMcCandlessJO’DonoghueA (eds) Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 95–116.
4.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of colour. Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241–1299.
5.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2014) General Comment No.1—Article 12: Equal Recognition Before the Law. UN Doc. No. CRPD/C/GC/1.
6.
de BhailísCFlynnE (2017) Recognising legal capacity: commentary and analysis of Article 12 CRPD. International Journal of Law in Context13(1): 6–21.
7.
EnrightMMcCandlessJO’DonoghueA (eds) (2017) Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart Publishing
8.
FaulknerA (2004) The Ethics of Survivor Research: Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Research Carried Out by Mental Health Service Users and Survivors. Bristol: Policy Press.
JohnsonK (2009) No longer researching about us without us: a researcher’s reflection on rights and inclusive research in Ireland. British Journal of Learning Disabilities37(4): 250–256.
16.
LowndesDStrnadJ (2018) ‘The law is very complicated….’. In: FlynnEArstein-KerslakeAClíona de BhailísM (eds) Global Perspectives on Legal Capacity Reform: Our Voices, Our Stories. London: Routledge, 71–80.
17.
McDonaghR (2018) Remarks at the Launch of Global Perspectives on Legal Capacity Reform: Our Voices, Our Stories. Available at: https://ercvoices.com/events/exhibition-book-launch/ (24October2018, accessed 12 May 2020)
18.
McLaughlinH (2010) Keeping service user involvement in research honest. British Journal of Social Work40(5): 1591–1608.
19.
MorrisJ (1992) Personal and political: a feminist perspective on researching physical disability. Disability, Handicap & Society7(2): 157–166.
SeshasayeeLJespersonM (2018) Getting sucked out of the black hole of India’s legal mental health machinery. In: FlynnEArstein-KerslakeA andClíonadeBhailísM (eds) Global Perspectives on Legal Capacity Reform: Our Voices, Our Stories. London: Routledge, 165–173.
22.
ShakespeareT (2006) Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge.
23.
StanevRWildemanS (2018) Freedom: a work in progress. In: FlynnEArstein-KerslakeAClíona de BhailísM (eds) Global Perspectives on Legal Capacity Reform: Our Voices, Our Stories. London: Routledge, 197–212.
24.
StoneEPriestleyM (1996) Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. British Journal of Sociology699–716.
25.
VanderWAKurzbanS (2011) Paying human subjects in research: where are we, how did we get here, and now what?The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics39(3): 543–558.
26.
WilliamsVSimonsKSwindon and People First Research Team (2005) More researching together: the role of nondisabled researchers in working with People First members. British Journal of Learning Disabilities33(1): 6–14.
