Ethnography of young people in confinement: on subjectivity,positionality and situated ethics in closed space

Abstract

This article explores the strengths and limitations of doing ethnographic research with young people in confinement. The article draws on two studies from Scotland and Denmark, and reflects on critical issues such as getting access, obtaining informed and voluntary consent, emotional challenges, safety, positionality and situated ethics. While a substantial body of literature addresses the methodological challenges of doing ethnographic research in prisons, the literature on doing qualitative research with young people confined in locked residential institutions and youth remand centres is very limited. The article demonstrates the continued importance of doing ethnographic research in penal institutions, by showing how sensory data and lived experience of penal practice and materiality, contributes to our understanding of how young people experience confinement. By drawing on fieldnotes and interviews, this article aims to inspire and lay the grounds for new researchers in the field.

Keywords

Confinement ethnography ethics closed institutions disadvantaged youth

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Hindi

Kawabata

(2002) Toward a more fully reflexive feminist geography. In: Moss

(ed.) Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 103–115.

Barry

McNeill

(2009) Youth offending and youth justice (Vol. 52). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Barry

Moodie

(2008) ‘This is not the road I want to go down’: young people’s perceptions and experiences of secure care. Who Cares? Scotland. Available at: http://www.whocaresscotland.org/pdf/ThisIsntTheRoadDesignedVersionFINAL28Jan09.pdf (accessed 27 July 2015).

Bengtsson

(2012) Boredom and action—Experiences from youth confinement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 41(5): 526–553.

Bengtsson

(2014) What are data? Ethnographic experiences with young offenders. Qualitative Research 14(6): 729–744.

Bondi

(2003) Empathy and identification: conceptual resources for feminist fieldwork. ACME 2(1): 64–76.

Bulmer

(2001) The ethics of social research. In: Gilbert

(ed.) Researching Social Life. London: Sage Publications, 45–57.

Burman

Batchelor

Brown

(2001) Researching girls and violence: facing the dilemmas of fieldwork. The British Journal of Criminolgy 41(3): 443–459.

Christians

(2000) Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In: Denzin

Lincoln

(eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 133–162.

10.

Clarke

Friese

Washburn

(2016) Situational Analysis in Practice: Mapping Research with Grounded Theory. London: Routledge.

11.

Cloke

Cook

Crang

, et al. (2004) Practising Human Geography. London: Sage Publications.

12.

Corsaro

(2005) The Sociology of Childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

13.

Crang

Cook

(2007) Doing Ethnographies. London: Sage.

14.

Davies

(1999) Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Reserching Selves and Others. London & New York: Routledge.

15.

Diamond

(2009) Making Gray Gold: Narratives of Nursing Home Care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Disney

(2015) Complex spaces of orphan care – a Russian therapeutic children’s community. Children’s Geographies 13(1): 30–43.

17.

Drake

Harvey

(2014) Performing the role of ethnographer: processing and managing the emotional dimensions of prison research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 17(5): 489–501.

18.

Enell

(2017) I got to know myself better, my failings and faults’ young people’s understandings of being assessed in secure accommodation. Young 25(2): 124–140.

19.

Fielding

(2001) Ethnography. In: Gilbert

(ed.) Researching Social Life. London: Sage Publications, 145–163.

20.

Foucault

(1979) Discipline and Punich: The birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.

21.

Fujii

(2015) Five stories of accidental ethnography: turning unplanned moments in the field into data. Qualitative Research 15(4): 525–539.

22.

Goldson

(2002) Vulnerable on the Inside: Children in Secure and Penal Settings. London: Children’s Society.

23.

Hammersley

Atkinson

(1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London & New York: Routledge.

24.

Hastrup

(2004) Getting it right: knowledge and evidence in anthropology. Anthropological Theory 4(4): 455–472.

25.

Hastrup

(2009) Videnskabelig praksis - det etiske felt i antropologien. In: Hastrup

(ed.) Mellem mennesker - en grundbog i antropologisk forskningsetik. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 9–30.

26.

Hastrup

(2010) Feltarbejde. In: Brinkman

Tanggaard

(eds) Kvalitative metoder. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 55–80.

27.

Henriksen

(2017) Confined to care: girls’ gendered vulnerabilities in secure institutions. Gender & Society 31(5): 677–698.

28.

Henriksen

(2018) Vulnerable girls and dangerous boys: gendered practices of discipline in secure care. Young 26(5): 427–443.

29.

Henriksen

Prieur

(2019) ‘So, Why am I here?’Ambiguous practices of protection, treatment and punishment in danish secure institutions for youth. The British Journal of Criminology 59(5): 1161–1177.

30.

Jewkes

(2012) Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry 18(1): 63–75.

31.

Kendrick

Steckley

Lerpiniere

(2008) Ethical issues, research and vulnerability: gaining the views of children and young people in residential care. Children’s Geographies 6(1): 79–93.

32.

Lee

(2000) Unobtrusive Methods in Social Research. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.

33.

Lee-Treweek

Linkogle

(2000) Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research. London & New York: Routledge.

34.

Liebling

(2001) Whose side are we on? Theory, practice and allegiances in prisons research. British Journal of Criminology 41(3): 472–484.

35.

Liebling

Stanko

(2001) Allegiance and ambivalence: some dilemmas in researching disorder and violence. The British Journal of Criminology 41(3): 421–430.

36.

Marcus

(1998) Ethnography Through Thick Thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

37.

McCorkel

(2003) Embodied surveillance and the gendering of punishment. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32(1): 41–76.

38.

McQueeney

Lavelle

(2017) Emotional labor in critical ethnographic work: in the field and behind the desk. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 46(1): 81–107.

39.

Moore

Scraton

(2013) The Incarceration of Women: Punishing Bodies, Breaking Spirits. London: Palgrave.

40.

Muncie

(2008) The ‘punitive turn’ in juvenile justice: cultures of control and rights compliance in Western Europe and the USA. Youth Justice 8(2): 107–121.

41.

Myers

(2015) Barriers, blinders, and unbeknownst experts: overcoming access barriers to conduct qualitative studies of juvenile justice. The Prison Journal 95(1): 66–83.

42.

Nielsen

(2010) Pains and possibilities in prison: on the use of emotions and positioning in ethnographic research. Acta Sociologica 53(4): 307–321.

43.

Phillips

Earle

(2010) Reading difference differently? Identity, epistemology and prison ethnography. The British Journal of Criminology 50(2): 360–378.

44.

Pink

(2015) Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage.

45.

Roesch-Marsh

Gadda

Smith

(2012) ‘It’s a tricky business!’: the impact of identity work in negotiating research access. Qualitative Social Work 11(3): 249–265.

46.

Rose

(1997) Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivity and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21(3): 305–320.

47.

Rowe

(2014) Situating the self in prison research: power, identity, and epistemology. Qualitative Inquiry 20(4): 404–416.

48.

Rubow

(2010) “Samtalen - interviewet som deltagerobservation.” s. 227–245 i Ind i verden, red. af Kirsten Hastrup. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

49.

Sanjek

(ed.) (1990) Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology. London: Cornell University Press.

50.

Schliehe

(2014) Inside ‘the carceral’: girls and young women in the Scottish criminal justice system. Scottish Geographical Journal 130(2): 71–85.

51.

Schliehe

(2016) Tracing outsideness: young women’s institutional journeys and the geographies of closed space (Doctoral dissertation), University of Glasgow.

52.

Schliehe

Crowley

(2017) Carefully controlled: young people and their pathways through spaces of secure care. In: Children, Young People and Care. London: Routledge, 108–123.

53.

Sultana

(2007) Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: negotiating fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research. ACME 6(3): 374–385.

54.

Scott

Hinton-Smith

Härmä

, et al. (2012) The reluctant researcher: shyness in the field. Qualitative Research 12(6): 715–734.

55.

Tedlock

(2000) Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In: Denzin

Lincoln

(eds) The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Lincoln. London: Sage Publications, 455–486.

56.

Te Riele

Brooks

(2013) Negotiating Ethical Challenges in Youth Research. London: Routledge.

57.

Ugelvik

(2014) Prison ethnography as lived experience: notes from the diaries of a beginner let loose in Oslo Prison. Qualitative Inquiry 20(4): 471–480.

58.

Valentine

(2002) People like us: negotiating sameness and difference in the research process. In: Moss

(ed.) Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 116–126.

59.

Vogel

(2018) An endeavour for autonomy: how girls understand their lived experiences of being referred to secure care. Young 26(1): 70–85.

60.

Wacquant

(2002) The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incarceration. Ethnography 3(4): 371–397.

61.

Watson

van der Meulen

(2019) Research in carceral contexts: confronting access barriers and engaging former prisoners. Qualitative Research 19(2): 182–198.