This article examines why survivors of rape in conflict take part in academic research and the impact that participating in sexual violence studies has on them. The research is based on 76 qualitative interviews conducted with survivors of sexual violence in the East of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The study established that survivors of rape were driven to participate in the research mainly because of their need to speak out and share their experiences, but participants were also influenced by the desire to seek advice and their willingness to help others in similar circumstances. The study also showed that most survivors interviewed found the experience of taking part in research beneficial. The article provides key methodological and ethical recommendations for the conduct of similar research in this area, focusing on methods, empathy and the need for researchers to be prepared to go beyond their academic role when engaging with survivors.
AckerJBarryKEsseveldJ (1983) Objectivity and truth: problems in doing feminist research. Women’s Studies International Forum6(4): 423–435.
2.
AroussiS (2018) Perceptions of justice and hierarchies of rape: rethinking approaches to sexual violence in Eastern Congo from the ground up. International Journal of Transitional Justice12(2): 277–295.
3.
BainesEStewartB (2011) ‘I cannot accept what I have not done’: storytelling, gender and transitional justice. Journal of Human Rights Practice3(3): 245–263.
4.
BergenRK (1993) Interviewing survivors of marital rape: doing feminist research on a sensitive topic. In: RenzettiCMLeeRM (eds) Researching Sensitive Topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 197–211.
5.
Burke DrauckerC (1999) The emotional impact of sexual violence research on participants. Archive of Psychiatric Nursing13(4): 161–169.
6.
CampbellRAdamsAE (2009) Why do rape survivors volunteer for face-to-face interviews?: a meta-study of victims’ reasons for and concerns about research participation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence24(3): 395–405.
7.
CampbellRAdamsAEWascoSM, et al. (2010) What has it been like for you to talk with me today? The impact of participating in interview research on rape survivors. Violence Against Women16(1): 60–83.
8.
Castor-LewisC (1988) On doing research with adult incest survivors: some initial thoughts and considerations. Women and Therapy7(1): 73–80.
9.
ClarkNJ (2017) Working with survivors of war rape and sexual violence: fieldwork reflections from Bosnia-Hercegovina. Qualitative Research17(4): 424–439.
10.
ClarkNJ (2012) Fieldwork and its ethical challenges: reflections from research in Bosnia. Human Rights Quarterly34(1): 823–839.
11.
DaleyP (2015) Researching sexual violence in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo: methodologies, ethics, and the production of knowledge in an African warscape. In: ColesAGrayLMomsenJ (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Gender and DevelopmentLondon: Routledge, 429–440.
12.
DeckerSNaugleAECarter-VisscherR, et al. (2011) Ethical issues in research on sensitive topics: participants’ experiences of distress and benefit. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics6(3): 55–64.
13.
DePrinceAPFreydJJ (2006) Costs and benefits of being asked about trauma history. Journal of Trauma Practice3(4): 23–35.
14.
Dickson-SwiftVJamesELKippenS, et al. (2009) Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research9(1): 61–79.
15.
FontesLA (2004) Ethics in violence against women research: the sensitive, the dangerous and the overlooked. Ethics and Behaviour14(2): 141–174.
16.
GrantRWSugarmanJ (2004) Ethics in human subjects research: do incentives matter?Journal of Medicine and Philosophy29(6): 717–738.
17.
GreadyP (2010) Responsibility to the story. Journal of Human Rights Practice2(2): 177–190.
18.
GriffinMResickPAWaldropAE, et al. (2003) Participation in trauma research: is there evidence of harm?Journal of Traumatic Stress16(3): 221–227.
19.
HlavkaHRKruttschnittCCarborne-LopezKC (2007) Revictimizing the victims? Interviewing women about interpersonal violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence22(7): 895–920.
20.
HugmanRPittawayEBartolomeiL (2011) When ‘do no harm’ is not enough: the ethics of research with refugees and other vulnerable groups. British Journal of Social Work41(1): 1271–1287.
21.
JacobsenKLandauLB (2003) The dual imperative in refugee research: some methodological and ethical considerations in research on forced migration. Disasters27(3): 185–206.
22.
MohantyC (1984) Under western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary2(12/13): 333–358.
23.
NewmanEKaloupekDG (2004) The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused research studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress17(5): 383–394.
24.
NewmanERischEKassam-AdamsN (2006) Ethical issues in trauma-related research: a review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics1(3): 29–46.
25.
PuechguirbalN (2017) Breaking the silence: new approaches to the consequences of rape in some African conflicts 1994–2008. In: RaphaëlleBFabriceV (eds) Rape in Wartime. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 140–152.
26.
SampsonHBloorMFinchamB (2008) A price worth paying? Considering the cost of reflexive research methods and the influence of feminist ways of doing. Sociology42(5): 919–933.
27.
SikweyiyaYJewkesR (2012) Perceptions and experiences of research participants on gender-based violence community based survey: implications for ethical guidelines. PlosOne7(4): 1–9.
28.
SmithLT (2012) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. 2nd edn.London: Zed Books.
29.
SpivakGC (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: NelsonCGrossbergL (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 271–313.
30.
SullivanCMCainD (2004) Ethical and safety considerations when obtaining information from or about battered women for research purposes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence19(5): 603–618.
ZimmermanCMichauLHossainM, et al. (2016) Rigged or rigorous? Partnerships for research and evaluation of complex social problems: lessons from the field of violence against women and girls. Journal of Public Health Policy37(Suppl 1): 95–109.
