This article demonstrates the significance of engaging with whiteness as a key dimension of difference shaping research in multi-faceted ways. I critically reflect on a research project that included interviews with Muslim men in Rotherham, a northern English town that had experienced a child sexual exploitation crisis involving Pakistani Muslim men. It raised significant methodological and epistemological issues regarding my position in the research, as a white female researcher, and my relationships with local Pakistani Muslim men and women. I highlight the fluidity of my insider–outsider position through exploring political and ethical dilemmas involved in carrying out the research and structural and experiential aspects of researcher subjectivity. I show how being white both facilitated and obstructed the research as I steered my way through a highly sensitive set of circumstances and how engaging with whiteness is key in democratising research and shedding light on unequal power relations in knowledge production.
AbbasT (ed.) (2005) Muslim Britain: Communities Under Pressure. London: Zed Books.
2.
AbellJLockeACondorS, et al. (2006) Trying similarity, doing difference: the role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people. Qualitative Research6(2): 221–244.
3.
AhmedS (2012) On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
4.
AlexanderC (2004) Imagining the Asian gang: ethnicity, masculinity and youth after ‘the Riots’. Critical Social Policy24(4): 526–549.
5.
ArendellT (1997) Reflections on the researcher-researched relationship: a woman interviewing men. Qualitative Sociology20(3): 341–368.
6.
BonnettA (1997) Constructions of whiteness in European and American anti-racism. In: WerbnerPModoodT (eds) Debating Cultural Hybridity: Multi-Cultural Identities and the Politics of Anti-Racism. London: Zed Books, 173–192.
7.
BonnettA (2000) White Identities: Historical and International Perspectives. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
8.
BrittonJ (2018) Challenging the racialization of child sexual exploitation: Muslim men, racism and belonging in Rotherham. Ethnic and Racial Studies42(5): 688–706.
9.
BrittonJ (2019) Muslim men, racialised masculinities and personal life. Sociology53(1): 36–51.
Dickson-SwiftVJamesELKippenS, et al. (2007) Doing sensitive research: what challenges do qualitative researchers face?Qualitative Research7(3): 327–353.
12.
DuncombeJJessopJ (2011) ‘Doing rapport’ and the ethics of ‘faking friendship’. In: MauthnerMBirchMJessopJ, et al. (eds) Ethics in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
13.
DwyerSCBuckleJL (2009) The space between: on being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Research8(1): 54–63.
14.
DyerR (2000) The matter of whiteness. In: BackLSolomosJ (eds) Theories of Race and Racism: A Reader. London: Routledge.
15.
EnglesT (2016) Racialized Slacktivism. In: KennedyTMMiddletonIJRatcliffeK (eds) Rhetorics of Whiteness: Postracial Hauntings in Popular Culture, Social Media and Education. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
16.
FeketeL (2009) A Suitable Enemy: Racism, Migration and Islamophobia in Europe. London: Pluto Press.
17.
FrankenbergR (1993) White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness. London: Routledge.
18.
GallagherCA (2000) White like me? Methods, meaning, and manipulation in the field of white studies. In TwineFWWarrenJW (eds) Racing Research, Researching Race: Methodological Dilemmas in Critical Race Studies. New York: New York University Press, 67–92.
19.
GarnerS (2007) Whiteness: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
20.
GoffmanE (1969) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.
21.
GohirS (2013) Unheard Voices: The Sexual Exploitation of Asian Girls and Young Women. Birmingham: Muslim Women’s Network UK.
22.
GunaratnamY (2003) Researching ‘Race’ and Ethnicity: Methods, Knowledge and Power. London: Sage.
23.
HallSM (2015) Super-diverse street: a ‘trans-ethnography’ across migrant localities. Ethnic and Racial Studies38(1): 22–37. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2013.858175
24.
HayfieldNHuxleyC (2015) Insider and outsider perspectives in research with lesbian and bisexual women. Qualitative Research in Psychology12(2): 91–106.
25.
HugheyMW (2012) White Bound: Nationalists, Antiracists and the Shared Meanings of Race. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
26.
IkonenH-MOjalaH (2007) Creating togetherness and experiencing difference in feminist interviews: knowing in a post-standpoint way?Graduate Journal of Social Science4(2): 80–102.
27.
JayA (2014) Independent Inquiry Into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham 1997–2013. Rotherham: Metropolitan Borough Council.
28.
MandersonLBennettEAndajani-SutjahjoS (2006) The social dynamics of the interview: age, class, and gender. Qualitative Health Research16(10): 1317–1334.
29.
MerriamSBJohnson-BaileyJLeeM-Y, et al. (2001) Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education20(5): 405–416.
30.
MillsCW (1959) The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
31.
MillsCW (1997) The Racial Contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
32.
ModoodTBerthoudRLakeyJ, et al. (1997) Ethnic Minorities in Britain: Diversity and Disadvantage. London: Policy Studies Institute.
33.
MoosaviL (2014) The racialization of Muslims converts in Britain and their experiences of Islamophobia. Critical Sociology41(1): 41–56.
34.
NealSBennettKCochraneA, et al. (2018). Lived Experiences of Multiculture: The New Social and Spatial Relations of Diversity. Abingdon: Routledge.
35.
NealSMohanGCochraneA, et al. (2015) You can’t move in Hackney without bumping into an anthropologist’: why certain places attract research attention, Qualitative Research16(5): 491–507.
36.
NorfolkA (2011). Revealed: conspiracy of silence on UK sex gangs. Most convicted offenders of Pakistani Heritage. The Times, 5January.
37.
PoindexterCC (2003) The ubiquity of ambiguity in research interviewing: an exemplar. Qualitative Social Work2(4): 383–409.
38.
PuwarN (2004) Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. Oxford: Berg.
39.
RasoolZ (2017) Collaborative working practices: imagining better research partnerships. Research for All1(2): 310–322.
40.
RhodesPJ (1994) Race-of-interviewer effects: a brief comment. Sociology28(2): 547–558.
41.
SaundersBKitzingerJKizingerC (2015) Anonymising interview data: challenges and compromise in practice. Qualitative Research15(5): 616–632.
42.
SinCH (2007) Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the Gaze on ‘White Others’ and ‘White’ as ‘Other’. Qualitative Research7(4): 477–499.
43.
TorngrenSONgehJ (2018) Reversing the Gaze: methodological reflections from the perspective of racial- and ethnic-minority researchers. Qualitative Research18(1): 3–18.
44.
TwineFW (2000) Racial ideologies and racial methodologies. In: TwineFWWarrenJW (eds) Racing Research, Researching Race: Methodological Dilemmas in Critical Race Studies. New York: New York University Press.
45.
TwineFW (2008) Introduction: the future of whiteness: a map of the ‘third wave’. Ethnic and Racial Studies31(1): 4–24.
46.
TwineFWWarrenJW (eds) (2000) Racing Research, Researching Race: Methodological Dilemmas in Critical Race Studies. New York: New York University Press.
47.
VahasantanenKSaarinenJ (2012) The power dance in the research interview: manifesting power and powerlessness. Qualitative Research13(5): 493–510.
48.
WessendorfS (2016). Settling in a super-diverse context: recent migrant’s experiences of conviviality. Journal of Intercultural Studies37(5): 449–463.
49.
YipAKT (2004) Negotiating space with family and kin in identity construction: the narratives of British non-heterosexual Muslims. The Sociological Review. 52(3): 335–350.
