In this article, I reflect upon access in the context of qualitative research, which I define as the process by which a researcher and the sites and/or individuals he or she studies relate to each other, through which the research in question is enabled. Access is a dynamic and multidirectional process, which depends on the researcher’s ability to access and to develop a ‘multiple vision’, and on the researcher’s and the research’s accessibility. Access influences the research process and results, and is shaped by power dynamics. Awareness of the complexity of access will help qualitative researchers to make more conscious and deliberate decisions, for example on which vantage points to include or exclude, or on how to protect participants and themselves. I illustrate my points of reflection with the help of vignettes from my research on the organizational dynamics behind the Greenpeace campaign against Norwegian whaling. I discuss implications for practice, and argue that perceiving of qualitative research as craftwork can help researchers to sustain complex notions of access.
AtkinsonP (2009) Ethics and ethnography. Twenty-First Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences4(1): 17–30.
2.
BatesonMC (2004) Willing to learn: Passages of Personal Discovery. Hanover, NH: Steerforth Press.
3.
BergerMT (2003) Dealing with difficult gatekeepers, vulnerable populations, and ‘hooks’ that go awry. In: FeldmanMBellJBergerM (eds) Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 65–68.
4.
BondyC (2013) How did I get here? The social process of accessing field sites. Qualitative Research13(5): 578–590.
5.
BourdieuP (2001) Masculine Domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
BrinkmannSKvaleS (2015) InterViews. Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (third edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
7.
BrownCGuilletdeMonthouxPMcCulloughA (1976) The Access-Casebook. Stockholm: Teknisk Högskolelitteratur i Stockholm AB.
8.
Brown-SaracinoJ (2014) From methodological stumbles to substantive insights: gaining ethnographic access in queer communities. Qualitative Sociology37(1): 43–68.
9.
BuchananDBoddyDMcCalmanJ (1988) Getting in, getting on, getting out, and getting back. In: BrymanA (ed.) Doing Research in Organizations. London and New York: Routledge, 53–67.
10.
BurgessRG (1984) In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research. London and New York: Routledge.
11.
BurrV (2003) Social Constructionism (second edition). London and New York: Routledge.
12.
CheekJ (2008) Beyond the ‘how to’: the importance of thinking about, not simply doing, qualitative research. In: NielsenKBrinkmannSElmholdtCTanggaardLMusaeusPKraftG (eds) A Qualitative Stance: In Memory of Steinar Kvale, 1938–2008. Århus: Aarhus University Press, 203–214.
13.
CheekJ (2011a) The politics and practices of funding qualitative inquiry: messages about messages about messages…. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (fourth edition) Los Angeles: Sage, 251–268.
14.
CheekJ (2011b) Points of hesitation: human rights, social justice and qualitative research. International Review of Qualitative Research4(2): 209–218.
15.
ClarkT (2010) On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research?Qualitative Research10(4): 399–419.
16.
CookKNunkoosingK (2008) Maintaining dignity and managing stigma in the interview encounter: the challenge of paid-for participation. Qualitative Health Research18(3): 418–427.
17.
CzarniawskaB (1998) A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage.
18.
Czarniawska-JoergesB (1992) Exploring Complex Organizations: A Cultural Perspective. Newbury Park, London and New Delhi: Sage.
19.
DahlesH (2008) Organizational ethnography. In: CleggSBaileyJR (eds) International encyclopedia of organization studies. Volume 3. London: Sage, 1066–7.
20.
DaviesBBanselP (2010) Governmentality and academic work: shaping the hearts and minds of academic workers. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing26(3): 5–20.
21.
DaviesBHarréR (1991) Positioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20(1): 43–63.
22.
DelamontS (2004) Ethnography and participant observation. In: SealeCGoboGGubriumJFSilvermanD (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage, 217–229.
23.
DenzinNK (2009) Qualitative Inquiry under Fire: Toward a New Paradigm Dialogue. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
24.
Dickson-SwiftVJamesELKippenSLiamputtongP (2009) Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research9(1): 61–79.
25.
EnsignJ (2003) Ethical issues in qualitative health research with homeless youths. Journal of Advanced Nursing43(1): 43–50.
26.
FeldmanMBellJBergerM (2003) Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
27.
FieldingN (2004) Working in hostile environments. In: SealeCGoboGGubriumJFSilvermanD (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage, 248–260.
28.
FineGA (1993) Ten lies of ethnography: moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography22(3): 267–293.
29.
FoucaultM (1982) Afterword: the subject and power. In: DreyfusHLRabinowP (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: The Harvester Press, 208–226.
30.
FreundPES (1988) Bringing society into the body: understanding socialized human nature. Theory and Society17(6): 839–864.
31.
GubaEGLincolnYS (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, London and New Delhi: Sage.
32.
GubaEGLincolnYS (1998) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The Landscape of Qualitative Research - Theories and Issues. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage, 195–220.
33.
GustersonH (1995) Exploding anthropology’s canon in the world of the bomb: ethnographic writing on militarism. In: HertzRImberJB (eds) Studying Elites using Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage, 187–205.
34.
HeshusiusL (1994) Freeing ourselves from objectivity: managing subjectivity or turning toward a participatory mode of consciousness?Educational Researcher23(3): 15–22.
35.
HolmesJ (2014) Countertransference in qualitative research: a critical appraisal. Qualitative Research14(2): 166–183.
36.
JuritzenTIGrimenHHeggenK (2011) Protecting vulnerable research participants: a Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees. Nursing Ethics18(5): 640–650.
37.
KurzmanC (1991) Convincing sociologists: values and interests in the sociology of knowledge. In: BurawoyM, et al. (eds) Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford: University of California Press, 250–268.
38.
Lee-TreweekG (2000) The insight of emotional danger: research experience in a home for older people. In: LinkogleSLee-TreweekG (eds) Danger in the Field: Ethics and Risk in Social Research. Florence, KY: Routledge, 114–131.
39.
LinAC (2003) Going to prison. In: FeldmanMBellJBergerM (eds) Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 102–106.
40.
LuhmannN (1995) Social Systems. Translated by BednarzJohnJr., with BaeckerDirk. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41.
MarshallCRossmanGB (2011) Designing Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, London and New Delhi: Sage.
42.
MaturanaHR (1999) The organization of the living: a theory of the living organization. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies51(2): 149–168.
43.
NeufeldAHarrisonMJHughesKDSpitzerDStewartMJ (2001) Participation of immigrant women family caregivers in qualitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research23(6): 575–591.
44.
Plankey-VidelaN (2012) Informed consent as process: problematizing informed consent in organizational ethnographies. Qualitative Sociology35(1): 1–21.
45.
ReevesCL (2010) A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research10(3): 315–331.
46.
RichardsonL (2000) Writing. A method of inquiry. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The Handbook of Qualitative Research (second edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 923–948.
47.
RugkåsaJCanvinK (2011) Researching mental health in minority ethnic communities: reflections on recruitment. Qualitative Health Research21(1): 132–143.
48.
SampsonHThomasM (2003) Lone researchers at sea: gender, risk and responsibility. Qualitative Research3(2): 165–189.
49.
SennettR (2003) Respect. The Formation of Character in an Age of Inequality. London and New York: Allen Lane.
50.
StakeRE (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage.
51.
SteinHF (2001) Nothing Personal, Just Business: A Guided Journey into Organizational Darkness. Westport: Quorum Books.
52.
StenlåsN (1998) Den inre kretsen. Den svenska ekonomiska elitens inflytande över partipolitik och opinionsbildning 1940–1949. Lund: Arkiv förlag.
53.
StraussAL (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
TaylorSJ (1999) Leaving the field: research, relationships, and responsibilities. In: BrymanABurgessRG (eds.) Qualitative Research. Volume IV. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage, 274–282.
55.
Tuhiwai SmithL (2005) On tricky ground: researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (third edition). Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage, 85–107.
56.
Van MaanenJ (1999) Playing back the tape: early days in the field. In: BrymanABurgessRG (eds) Qualitative Research. Volume I. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage, 280–290.
57.
WelchCMarschan-PiekkariRPenttinenHTahvanainenM (2002) Corporate elites as informants in qualitative international business research. International Business Review11: 611–628.
58.
WendlerD, et al. (2006) Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research?PLoS Medicine3(2): e19.
59.
WigfallVGBrannenJMooneyAParutisV (2013) Finding the right man: recruiting fathers in inter-generational families across ethnic groups. Qualitative Research13(5): 591–607.
60.
WithamGBeddowAHaighC (2015) Reflections on access: too vulnerable to research?Journal of Research in Nursing20(1): 28–37.
61.
WrzesniewskiADuttonJEDebebeG (2003) Help from unexpected places: access and assistance from within an organization. In: FeldmanMBellJBergerM (eds) Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 92–96.
62.
YanceyAKOrtegaANKumanyikaSK (2006) Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annual Review of Public Health27: 1–28.
