This article conceptualizes the collective method to describe how 12 scholars worked collaboratively to study the effects of displacement following Hurricane Katrina. The collective method is defined as an integrated, reflexive process of research design and implementation in which a diverse group of scholars studying a common phenomenon-yet working on independent projects-engage in repeated theoretical and methodological discussions to improve (1) research transparency and accountability and (2) the rigor and efficacy of each member’s unique project. This process generates critical discussions over researchers’ and respondents’ positionality, the framework of intersectionality, and applied ethics. Informed by feminist theoretical and methodological considerations of reflexivity, insider-outsider positionality, power relations, and social justice, the collective method can enhance scholars’ standpoints regarding philosophical, ethical, and strategic issues that emerge in the research process.
AldridgeJ (2014) Working with vulnerable groups in social research: dilemmas by default and design. Qualitative Research14: 112–130.
2.
BarberKHaneyTJ (2016) The experiential gap in disaster research: feminist epistemology and the contribution of local affected researchers. Sociological Spectrum36(2): 57–74.
3.
BevcC (2010) Emotional dimensions of conducting research in disaster settings: a note on social psychological dimensions. Journal of Applied Social Science4: 33–42.
4.
BowlegL (2012) The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health102: 1267–1273.
5.
BrowneKE (2015) Standing in the Need: Culture, Comfort, and Coming Home after Katrina. Austin: University of Texas Press.
6.
BrowneKEPeekL (2014) Beyond the IRB: an ethical toolkit for long-term disaster research. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters31: 1–41.
7.
CarrollK (2013) Infertile? The emotional labour of sensitive and feminist research methodologies. Qualitative Research13: 546–561.
8.
CharmazK (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 359–380.
9.
ClarkeAE (2012) Feminism, grounded theory, and situational analysis revisited. In: Hesse-BiberS (ed.) Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 388–412.
10.
ColeER (2008) Coalitions as a model for intersectionality: from practice to theory. Sex Roles59: 443–453.
11.
CollinsPH (1986) Learning from the outsider within: the sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems33: 514–530.
12.
DenzinNK (1997) Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
DillBZambranaR (eds.) (2009) Emerging Intersections: Race, Class, and Gender in Theory, Policy, and Practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
14.
DrabekTE (1970) Methodology of studying disasters: past patterns and future possibilities. American Behavioral Scientist13: 331–343.
15.
DrabekTE (2002) Following some dreams: recognizing opportunities, posing interesting questions, and implementing alternative methods. In: StallingsRA (ed.) Methods of Disaster Research. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris, 127–153.
16.
EdwardsRMauthnerM (2012) Ethics and feminist research: theory and practice. In: MillerTBirchMMauthnerMJessopJ (eds.) Ethics in Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 14–28.
17.
EriksonKPeekL (2013) The Hurricane Katrina Research Bibliography. New York: Social Science Research Council.
18.
FothergillAPeekL (2015) Children of Katrina. Austin: University of Texas Press.
19.
GaillardJCGomezC (2015) Post-disaster research: is there gold worth the rush?Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies7.1, Art. #120: 1–6.
20.
HancockA (2007) When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics5: 63–79.
21.
HaneyTBarberK (2013) Reconciling academic objectivity and subjective trauma: the double consciousness of sociologists who experienced Hurricane Katrina. Critical Sociology39: 105–122.
22.
HankivskyO (2012) An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework. Vancouver, CA: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy. Available at: http://www.sfu.ca/iirp/index.html
23.
HardingS (2008) Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
HenwoodKL (2008) Qualitative research, reflexivity, and living with risk: valuing and practicing epistemic reflexivity and centering marginality. Qualitative Research in Psychology5(1): 45–55.
25.
Hesse-BiberS (2012) Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
LaneLTaberNWoloshynV (2012) Negotiating tensions in researching, facilitating, and critiquing gender: exploring institutional and feminist influences. Forum Qualitative Social Research13: 10.
27.
LatherP (2007) Getting Lost: Feminist Efforts Toward a Double(d) Science. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
LuftRE (2012) Community organizing in the Katrina diaspora: race, gender, and the case of the People’s Hurricane Relief Fund. In: WeberLPeekL (eds.) Displaced: Life in the Katrina Diaspora. Austin: University of Texas Press, 233–255.
29.
LuftREWardJ (2009) Toward an intersectionality just out of reach: confronting challenges to intersectional practice. Advances in Gender Research13: 9–37.
30.
MayhewMBGuoXHaaseSHarteminkAJ (2012) Close encounters of the collaborative kind. Computer45: 24–30.
31.
McCallL (2005) The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society30: 1771–1800.
32.
MichaelsS (2003) Perishable information, enduring insights? Understanding quick response research. In: MondayJL (ed.) Beyond September 11: An Account of Post-Disaster Research. Special Publication #39. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 15–48.
33.
MiletiDS (1987) Sociological methods and disaster research. In: DynesRde MarchiBPelandaC (eds.) Sociology of Disasters: Contributions of Sociology to Disaster Research. Milan: Franco Angeli, 57–69.
34.
NaplesN (1998) Community Activism and Feminist Politics: Organizing Across Race, Class, and Gender. New York: Routledge.
35.
PardeeJW (2014) Surviving Katrina: The Experiences of Low-Income African American Women. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.
36.
PardeeJW (2015) Trauma survivor as author: method as recovery. In: HaubertJ (ed.) Rethinking Disaster Recovery. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 139–151.
37.
PeekLFothergillAPardeeJWeberL (2014) The research network: learning from persons displaced by Hurricane Katrina. Sociological Inquiry84(3): 354–359.
PhillipsB (2014) Qualitative Disaster Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
StallingsRA (2002) Methods of disaster research: unique or not? In: StallingsRA (ed.) Methods of Disaster Research. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris, 21–44.
41.
SpragueJ (2005) Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
42.
TaylorJ (2011) The intimate insider: negotiating the ethics of friendship when doing insider research. Qualitative Research11: 3–22.
43.
TilleyLWoodthorpeK (2011) Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research11: 197–212.
44.
WeberL (2010) Race, Class, Gender, and Sexuality: A Conceptual Framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
WeberL (2012) The research network. In: WeberLPeekL (eds.) Displaced: Life in the Katrina Diaspora. Austin: University of Texas Press, 21–24.
46.
WeberLPeekL (eds.) (2012) Displaced: Life in the Katrina Diaspora. Austin: University of Texas Press.
47.
VainioA (2013) Beyond research ethics: anonymity as ‘ontology’, ‘analysis’ and ‘independence’. Qualitative Research13: 685–698.
