In this article we introduce tension as a means for qualitative data analysis based on Mikhail Bakhtin’s dialogical theory. We first explain the foundations of Bakhtin’s theory and show the inevitability of tension in our lives and qualitative data analysis. We then offer a review of how Bakhtin’s notion of tension has manifested itself in qualitative research, which prompts us to establish a tensional approach to qualitative data analysis. Finally, we outline our framework for a tensional approach to data analysis and illustrate examples of putting this approach into practice in our own study. Our tensional approach (1) explores key moments of tension; (2) seeks out unease and discomfort; (3) involves researcher and research participants in ongoing dialogue; (4) and embraces multiple perspectives on a range of tensions during the data analysis process. It encourages uncertainties and questions instead of pursuing certainty of meaning and fixed conclusions.
AvelingELGillespieA (2008) Negotiating multiplicity: adaptive asymmetries within second-generation Turks ‘society of mind’. Journal of Constructivist Psychology21(3): 200–222.
2.
BakhtinMM (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
BakhtinMM (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
BakhtinMM (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
BilligMCondorSEdwardsDGaneMMiddletonDRadleyAR (1988) Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: SAGE.
6.
BolerM (1999) Feeling Power: Emotions and Education. New York: Routledge.
7.
BriggsC (1986) Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrunerJ (2004) Life as narrative. Social Research71(3): 691–710.
9.
BurdickJSandlinJA (2010) Inquiry as answerability: toward a methodology of discomfort in researching critical public pedagogies. Qualitative Inquiry16(5): 349–360.
ClandininDJMurphyMSHuberJOrrAM (2009) Negotiating narrative inquiries: living in a tension-filled midst. Journal of Educational Research103(2): 81–90.
12.
ColeP (2016) Paige’s story. In: Fecho FalterMMHongX (eds) Teaching Outside the Boxbut Inside the Standards: Making Room for Dialogue. New York: Teachers College Press, 15–28.
13.
DuarteEM (2002) Dialogue, difference, and the multicultural public sphere. In: BaileyASmithkaJP (eds) Community, Diversity, and Difference: Implications for Peace. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 33–44.
14.
FabianSC (2008) Voice. In: GivenLM (eds) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 943–944.
15.
FrankAW (2005) What is dialogical research, and why should we do it?Qualitative Health Research15(7): 964–974.
16.
FrankAW (2012) Practicing dialogical narrative analysis. In HolsteinAJGubriumJ (eds) Varieties of Narrative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 31–52.
17.
FechoB (2011) Teaching for the Students: Habits of Heart, Mind, and Practice in the Engaged Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
FechoBMeachamS (2007) Learning to play and playing to learn: research sites as transactional spaces. In: LewisCEncisoPMojeEB (eds) Reframing Sociocultural Research on Literacy: Identity, Agency, and Power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 163–187.
19.
GomersallTMadillASummersLKM (2012) Getting one’s thoughts straight: a dialogical analysis of women’s accounts of poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Psychology & Health27(3): 378–393.
20.
GoldsteinER (2011) The anatomy of influence. Chronicle of Higher EducationLVIII(13): B5–B10.
21.
HermansHHermans-KonopkaA (2010) Dialogical Self Theory: Positioning and Counter-positioning in a Globalizing Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HeronJReasonP (2001) The practice of co-operative inquiry: research with rather than on people. In: ReasonPBradburyH (eds) Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, London: SAGE, 179–188.
23.
HimleyMCariniP (2000) From Another Angle: Children’s Strengths and School Standards. New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
JamesW (1890[1981]) The Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
OlivaM (2000) Shifting landscapes/shifting langue: qualitative research from the in-between. Qualitative Inquiry6(1): 33–57.
26.
PillowWS (2003) Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education16(2): 175–196.
27.
RoulstonK (2001) Data analysis and ‘theorizing as ideology.’Qualitative Research1(3): 279– 302.
28.
SinhaSBackL (2014) Making methods sociable: dialogue, ethics and authorship in qualitative research. Qualitative Research14(4): 473–487.
29.
St. PierreEAJacksonAY (2014) Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry20(6): 715–719.
30.
StewartTT (2011) Transactional analysis: conceptualizing a framework for illuminating human experience. International Journal of Qualitative Methods10(3): 282–295.
31.
SullivanP (2012) Qualitative Data Analysis: Using a Dialogical Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
TanggaardL (2009) The research interview as a dialogical context for the production of social life and personal narratives. Qualitative Inquiry15(9): 1498–1515.
33.
WebsterLMertovaP (2007) Using Narrative Inquiry as a Research Method: An Introduction to Using Critical Event Narrative Analysis in Research on Learning and Teaching (E-book).
34.
WilkinsonSKitzingerC (eds) (1996) Representing the Other: A Feminism and Psychology Reader. London: SAGE.
35.
WooffittR (2005) Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London: SAGE.
