The ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis: a reply to Taylor and Smith

Abstract

View all access options for this article.

Hammersley

(2003) ‘Analytics’ are no substitute for methodology: a response to Speer and Hutchby. Sociology 37(2): 339–351.

Hammersley

(2009) Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 12(3): 211–225.

Hammersley

(2014) On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research 14(5): 529–541. DOI:10.1177/1468794113495039.

Hammersley

Traianou

(2012) Ethics in Qualitative Research: Controversies and Contexts. London: Sage.

Schegloff

(1971) Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In: Sudnow

(ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press, pp. 75–119.

Speer

(2002) ‘Natural’ and ‘contrived’ data: a sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies 4(4): 511–525.

Speer

Hutchby

(2003) From ethics to analytics: aspects of participants’ orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices. Sociology 37(2): 315–338.

Smith

(2014) The ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis: responses to Martyn Hammersley. Qualitative Research 14(5): 542–548.

Taylor

(2014) The ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis: responses to Martyn Hammersley. Qualitative Research 14(5): 542–548.