Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-8
Situated knowledge in cross-cultural,cross-language research: a collaborative reflexive analysis of researcher,assistant and participant subjectivities
This article analyzes situated knowledge through the lens of the author and her three field assistants. This work is written self-reflexively and is based on geographical fieldwork in Eastern Africa. It seeks to capitalize on the personal and professional relationships of the researcher and her field assistants to improve both research outcomes and working arrangements. Reflecting on episodes of failure, anxiety and misunderstanding, it disentangles the power geometry of situated knowledge and sheds light on the vital role played by the assistant/interpreter and by his/her positionality ‘in the making’ of cross-cultural, cross-language research. Grounded in a feminist epistemological perspective, this article shows that methodological reflexivity should engage not only the researcher or the participants but also the field assistants. This praxis is crucial to enhancing the validity of studies conducted in a cross-cultural, cross-language environment across social science.
BondiL (2003) Empathy and identification: conceptual resources for feminist fieldwork. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies2(1): 64–76.
DomoshM (2003) Toward a more fully reciprocal feminist inquiry. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies2(1): 107–111.
5.
EdwardsR (1990) Connecting method and epistemology: a white woman interviewing black women. Women’s Studies International Forum13(5): 477–490.
6.
EdwardsR (2013) Power and trust: an academic researcher’s perspective on working with interpreters as gatekeepers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology16(6): 503–514.
7.
EllisCBochnerAP (2005) Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: researcher as subject. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 733–768.
8.
England KVL (1994) Getting personal: reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer46(1): 80–89.
9.
Falconer Al-HindiKKawabataH (2000) Toward a more fully reflexive feminist geography. In: MossP (ed) Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods. Oxford: Blackwell, 103–115.
10.
HarawayD (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Women. London: Routledge.
11.
KannenV (2012) Pregnant, privileged and PhDing: exploring embodiments in qualitative research. Journal of Gender Studies22(2): 1–14.
12.
KobayashiA (1994) Coloring the field: gender, ‘race’, and the politics of fieldwork. The Professional Geographer46(1): 73–80.
13.
MandelJL (2003) Negotiating expectations in the field: gatekeepers, research fatigue and cultural biases. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography24(2): 198–210.
14.
MiraftabF (2004) Can you belly dance? Methodological questions in the era of transnational feminist research. Gender, Place & Culture11(4): 595–604.
15.
MolonyTHammettD (2007) The friendly financier: talking money with the silenced assistant. Human Organization66(3): 292–300.
16.
NagarR (2013) Storytelling and co-authorship in feminist alliance work: reflections from a journey. Gender, Place & Culture20(1): 1–18.
17.
NencelL (2013) Situating reflexivity: voices, positionalities and representations in feminist ethnographic texts. Women’s Studies International Forum. DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.018
18.
ObolerRS (1986) For better or worse: anthropologists and husbands in the field. In: WhiteheadTLConawayME (eds) Self, Sex, and Gender in Cross-cultural Fieldwork. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 28–51.
19.
PhillipsH (1960) Problems of translation and meaning in fieldwork. In: AdamsRNPreissJJ (eds) Human Organization Research: Field Relations and Techniques. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press, 290–307.
20.
RegmiKNaidooJPilkingtonP (2010) Understanding the processes of translation and transliteration in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods9(1): 16–26.
21.
RobsonE (1997) From teacher to taxi driver: reflection on research roles in developing areas. In: RobsonEWillisK (eds) Postgraduate Fieldwork in Developing Areas: A Rough Guide. London: Developing Areas Research Group (DARG) of the Institute of British Geographers, 51–74.
22.
RoseG (1997) Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography21(3): 305–320.
23.
ScheyvensRLeslieH (2000) Gender, ethics and empowerment: dilemmas of development fieldwork. Women’s Studies International Forum23(1): 119–130.
24.
TempleB (2002) Crossed wires: interpreters, translators, and bilingual workers in cross-language research. Qualitative Health Research12(6): 844–854.
25.
TempleBEdwardsR (2002) Interpreters/translators and cross-language research: reflexivity and border crossings. International Journal of Qualitative Methods1(2): 1–12 .
26.
TempleBYoungA (2004) Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research4(2): 161–178.
27.
TurnerS (2010) Research note: the silenced assistant. Reflections of invisible interpreters and research assistants. Asia Pacific Viewpoint51(2): 206–219.
28.
WatsonEE (2004) ‘What a dolt one is’: language learning and fieldwork in geography. Area36(1): 59–68.
29.
WengleJL (2005) Ethnographers in the Field: The Psychology of Research. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
30.
WilliamsonDLChoiJCharchukM. (2011) Interpreter-facilitated cross-language interviews: a research note. Qualitative Research11(4): 381–394.
