Findings from knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews have the potential to help guide policy formation and practice in many disciplines. Unfortunately, this potential is currently hindered by the fact that rigorous data analysis methods have not been consistently used and/or articulated for purposes of conducting these types of reviews. Content analysis is a flexible data analysis method that can be used to conduct qualitative systematic reviews; however, its application in this context has not been fully explicated. Qualitative systematic reviewers who aim to build knowledge and generate theory are urged to adapt content analysis methods to accommodate data that are, by nature, highly organized and contextualized. In addition, they are encouraged to use reflective memoing and diagramming to ensure valid integration, interpretation, and synthesis of findings across studies. Finally, reviewers are advised to clearly and fully explain their data analysis methods in research reports.
AdamNM (2000) Domestic violence against women within immigrant Indian and Pakistani communities in the United States. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois, Chicago.
2.
AhmadFDriverNMcNallyMJ. (2009) Why doesn’t she seek help for partner abuse? An exploratory study with South Asian immigrant women. Social Science & Medicine69(4): 613–622.
3.
AnithaS (2008) Neither safety nor justice: the UK government response to domestic violence against immigrant women. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law30(3): 189–202.
4.
AnithaS (2010) No recourse, no support: state policy and practice towards South Asian women facing domestic violence in the UK. British Journal of Social Work40(2): 462–479.
5.
AverillJB (2002) Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research12(6): 855–866.
6.
BirksMChapmanYFrancisK (2008) Memoing in qualitative research: probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing13(1): 68–75.
7.
CampbellRPoundPMorganM. (2011) Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technology Assessment15(43). Available at: http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon1543.pdf (accessed 18 June 2012).
8.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd Edition). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
9.
EloSKyngasH (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing62(1): 107–115.
10.
FinfgeldD (2003) Meta-synthesis: the state of the art – so far. Qualitative Health Research13(7): 893–904.
11.
Finfgeld-ConnettD (2009) Model of therapeutic and non-therapeutic responses to patient aggression. Issues in Mental Health Nursing30(9): 530–537.
12.
Finfgeld-ConnettD (2010a) Becoming homeless, being homeless, and resolving homelessness among women. Issues in Mental Health Nursing31(7): 461–469.
13.
Finfgeld-ConnettD (2010b) Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings. Journal of Advanced Nursing66(2): 246–254.
Finfgeld-ConnettDBloomTLJohnsonED (2012a) Perceived competency and resolution of homelessness among women with substance abuse problems. Qualitative Health Research22(3): 416–427.
16.
Finfgeld-ConnettDJohnsonED (2012b) Culturally-congruent helping services for abused South Asian women. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17.
Finfgeld-ConnettDJohnsonED (2013) Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing69(1): 194–204.
18.
GraneheimUHLundmanB (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today24(2): 105–112.
19.
HannesKMacaitisK (2012) A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers. Qualitative Research. Epub ahead of print 11May2012. DOI: 10.1177/1468794111432992.
20.
HolmALSeverinssonE (2012) Systematic review of the emotional state and self-management of widows. Nursing & Health Sciences14(1): 109–120.
21.
HsiehH-FShannonSE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15(9): 1277–1288.
22.
JamesA (2012) Seeking the analytic imagination: reflections on the process of interpreting qualitative data. Qualitative Research. Epub ahead of print 14June2012. DOI: 10.1177/1468794112446108.
23.
JasperMA (2005) Using reflective writing within research. Journal of Research in Nursing10(3): 247–260.
24.
KellerJ (2011) Why sketch? In: CanfieldMR (ed.) Field Notes on Science and Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 161–185.
25.
LeemanJSandelowskiM (2012) Practice-based evidence and qualitative inquiry. Journal of Nursing Scholarship44(2): 171–179.
26.
LempertLB (2007) Asking questions of the data: memo writing in the grounded theory tradition. In: BryantACharmazK (eds) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 245–264.
27.
MajorCHSavin-BadenM (2010) An Introduction to Qualitative Research Synthesis: Managing the Information Explosion in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
MorseJMSingletonJ (2001) Exploring the technical aspects of ‘fit’ in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research11(6): 841–847.
30.
MruckKMeyG (2007) Grounded theory and reflexivity. In: BryantACharmazK (eds) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 515–538.
31.
NoblitGWHareRD (1988) Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
O’ReillyMParkerN (2012) ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research. Epub ahead of print 17May2012. DOI: 10.1177/1468794112446106.
33.
PatersonBLThorneSECanamC. (2001) Meta-study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-analysis and Meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
PawsonR (2006) Digging for nuggets: how ‘bad’ research can yield ‘good’ evidence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology9(2): 127–142.
35.
RajASilvermanJG (2007) Domestic violence help-seeking behaviors of South Asian battered women residing in the United States. International Review of Victimology14(1): 143–170.
36.
RissanenMKylmaJLaukkanenE (2011) Systematic literature review: self-mutilation among adolescents as a phenomenon and help for it—what kind of knowledge is lacking?Issues in Mental Health Nursing32(9): 575–583.
37.
SandelowskiMBarrosoJ (2007) Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer.
38.
SandelowskiMVoilsCIBarrosoJ. (2008) ‘Distorted into clarity’: a methodological case study illustrating the paradox of systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health31(5): 454–465.
39.
ShirwadkarS (2004) Canadian domestic violence policy and Indian immigrant women. Violence Against Women10(8): 860–879.
40.
SternPN (2007) On solid ground: essential properties for growing grounded theory. In: BryantACharmazK (eds) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 114–126.
41.
ZimmerL (2006) Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing53(3): 311–318.
