Anonymity – its desirability and perceived difficulty divides the domain of qualitative research. This article shows that such divisions are associated with discrepancies in assumptions about what the power relations between the researcher and the researched, as well as the desired goals of the research, should be. This article questions the assumption that anonymity is necessary only for ethical reasons and identifies three additional functions of it in qualitative research: anonymity as ‘ontology’, anonymity as ‘analysis’ and anonymity as ‘independence’. First, ontologically, anonymity is a way of turning into ‘data’ what someone has said or written. Second, anonymization as ‘analysis’ turns the participants into examples of specific theoretical categories, and as such is a part of the data analysis. Third, anonymity as ‘independence’ enables the researcher to interpret the data irrespective of the participants’ wishes. As a conclusion, this article argues that anonymizing research participants has an influence on the overall quality of research and therefore is also useful when no ethical risks are perceived, when participants wish not to remain anonymous or when their anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
BrysonLWinterI (1999) Social Change, Suburban Lives: An Australian Newtown 1960s to 1990s. St. Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
9.
ClarkA (2006) Anonymising Research Data. The Universities of Manchester and Leeds: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
10.
ClarkeAFujimuraJ (1992) What tools? Which jobs? Why right? In: ClarkAFujimuraJ (eds) The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 3–44.
11.
CliffordJMarcusG (eds) (1986) Writing Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12.
CordenA (2007) Using Verbatim Quotations in Reporting Qualitative Social Research: A Review of Selected Publications. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
13.
CordenASainsburyR (2006a) Exploring ‘Quality’: research participants’ perspectives on verbatim quotations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology9(2): 97–110.
14.
CordenASainsburyR (2006b) Using Verbatim Quotations in Reporting Qualitative Social Research: Researchers’ Views. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
15.
CordenASainsburyR (2006c) Using Verbatim Quotations in Reporting Qualitative Social Research: The Views of Research Users. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
16.
CrowGWilesR (2008) Managing Anonymity and Confidentiality in Social Research: The Case of Visual Data in Community Research. The Universities of Manchester and Leeds: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
DuckettPSFryerD (1998) Developing empowering research practices with people who have learning disabilities. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology8: 57–65.
19.
EnsignJ (2003) Ethical issues in qualitative health research with homeless youths. Journal of Advanced Nursing43(1): 43–50.
20.
FiskeST (2009) Social Beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology. New York: Wiley.
21.
FrenchT (1993) South of Heaven. New York: Doubleday.
22.
GiordanoJO’ReillyMTaylorH. (2007) Confidentiality and autonomy: the challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity. Qualitative Health Research17: 264–275.
23.
GraceG (2002) Catholic Schools: Mission, Markets and Morality. London: Routledge.
24.
GrinyerA (2002) The anonymity of research participants: assumptions, ethics and practicalities. Social Research Update36, University of Surrey, UK.
25.
GuentherKM (2009) The politics of names: rethinking the methodological and ethical significance of naming people, organizations, and places. Qualitative Research9(4): 411–421.
26.
HaverkampBE (2005) Ethical perspectives on qualitative research in applied psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology52(2): 146–155.
27.
HerdmanE (2000) Pearls, pith and provocation: reflections on ‘Making Somebody Angry’. Qualitative Health Research10(5): 689–702.
28.
HollandSRenoldERossN. (2008) Rights, ‘Right on’ or the Right Thing to Do? A Critical Exploration of Young People’s Engagement in Participative Social Work Research. The Universities of Manchester and Leeds: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
29.
IrvineHGaffikinM (2006) Getting in, getting on and getting out: reflections on a qualitative research project. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal19(1): 115–145.
30.
IsraelMHayI (2006) Research Ethics for Social Scientists: Between Ethical Conduct and Regulatory Compliance. London: Sage.
31.
Karnieli-MillerOStrierRPessachL (2009) Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research19(2): 279–289.
32.
KellyA (2009) In defence of anonymity: rejoining the criticism. British Educational Research Journal35(3): 431–445.
33.
KidderLHFineM (1997) Qualitative inquiry in psychology: a radical tradition. In: FoxDPrilleltenskyI (eds) Critical Psychology: An Introduction. London: Sage, 34–50.
34.
KrautREOlsonJManajiM. (2003) Psychological research online: opportunities and challenges. American Psychologist59(2): 105–117.
35.
KuulaATiitinenS (2010) Eettiset kysymykset ja haastattelujen jatkokäyttö [Ethical issues and secondary use of interviews]. In: RuusuvuoriJRelanderPHyvärinenM (eds) Haastattelun Analyysi [The Analysis of an Interview]. Tampere: Vastapaino, 446–459.
36.
LawtonJ (2001) Gaining and maintaining informed consent: ethical concerns raised in a study of dying patients. Qualitative Health Research11: 69–73.
37.
LiJ (2008) Ethical challenges in participant observation: a reflection on ethnographic fieldwork. Qualitative Report13(1): 100–115.
38.
MartinJFeldmanMSHatchMJ. (1983) The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories. Administrative Science Quarterly28(3): 438–453.
National Advisory Board on Research Ethics (2009) Ethical principles of research in the humanities and social and behavioural sciences and proposals for ethical review. Available at: http://www.tenk.fi/eettinen_ennakkoarviointi/ethicalprinciples.pdf (accessed 30 November 2011).
41.
NesporJ (2000) Anonymity and place in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry6: 546–569.
42.
PedersenJSDobbinF (2006) In search of identity and legitimation: bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist49(7): 897–907.
43.
PeshkinA (2001) Permissible Advantage? The Moral Consequences of Elite Schooling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
PonterottoJG (2006) Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept ‘Thick Description’. Qualitative Report11(3): 538–549.
45.
PunchM (1998) Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) The Landscape of Qualitative Research. London: Sage, 83–97.
46.
RichardsHMSchwartzLJ (2002) Ethics of qualitative research: are there special issues for health services research?Family Practice19(2): 135–139.
47.
RodhamKGavinJ (2006) The ethics of using the Internet to collect qualitative research data. Research Ethics Review2(3): 92–97.
48.
RyenA (2007) Ethical issues. In: SealeCGoboGGubriumJ. (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 218–235.
49.
Scheper-HughesN (2000) Ire in Ireland. Ethnography1(1): 117–140.
50.
SieberJStanleyB (1988) Ethical and professional dimensions of socially sensitive research. American Psychologist42: 49–55.
51.
SilvermanD (2009) Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook (3rd Edition). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
52.
SmithML (1987) Publishing qualitative research. American Educational Research Journal24: 173–183.
53.
StallerK (2007) Metalogue as methodology: inquiries into conversations among authors, editors and referees. Qualitative Social Work6(2): 137–157.
54.
ThomsonDBzdelLGolden-BiddleK. (2005) Central questions of anonymization: a case study of secondary use of qualitative data. Forum: Qualitative Social Research58(1): 161–176.
55.
TiittulaLRuusuvuoriJ (2005) Johdanto. In: RuusuvuoriJTiittulaL (eds) Haastattelu: Tutkimus, Tilanteet ja Vuorovaikutus [Interview: Research, Contexts and Interaction]. Tampere: Vastapaino, 9–21.
56.
TilleyLWoodthorpeK (2011) Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research11(2): 197–212.
57.
Van Den HoonaardWC (2003) Is anonymity an artefact in ethnographic research?Journal of Academic Ethics1: 141–151.
58.
WalfordG (2005) Research ethical guidelines and anonymity. International Journal of Research and Method in Education28(1): 83–93.
59.
WhettenDAMackeyA (2002) A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society41(4): 393–414.
60.
WilesRCharlesVCrowG. (2006) Researching researchers: lessons for research ethics. Qualitative Research6(3): 283–299.
61.
WilesRCrowGHeathS. (2008) The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology11(5): 417–428.
