Drawing on Schutz’s treatment of the We-relationship and of meaning contexts, and on Michael Jackson’s exploration of the ambiguities of the intersubjective, this article examines the methodological implications of the empathic orientation developed in the context of intimacy for a discipline based on participant observation. I argue that moments of ‘breakdown’, a classic way in which ethnographic questions are revealed, are predicated on the intentional dynamics of intersubjective relationships. I draw on a particular experience of ‘breakdown’ on an overnight truck trip in Highlands Papua New Guinea juxtaposed with expectations of intimacy developed over long-term fieldwork spanning 12 years.
AgarMH (1982) Toward an ethnographic language. American Anthropologist84(4): 779–795.
2.
BaldwinDA (1995) Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In: C and DunhamPJ (eds) Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 131-158.
3.
BriggsJ (1970) Never in Anger: Portrait of an Eskimo Family. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
4.
GeertzC (1967) Under the mosquito net. The New York Review of Books9(4), 14September.
5.
GeertzC (1973) Deep play: notes on a Balinese cockfight. Daedalus101: 1–29.
6.
GeertzC (1974) ‘From the Native’s Point of View’: on the nature of anthropological understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences28(1): 26–45.
7.
GellA (1979) Reflections on a cut finger: taboo in the Umeda conception of the self. In: HookRH (ed.) Fantasy and Symbol: Studies in Anthropological Interpretation. London; New York; San Francisco, CA: Academic Press, 133–148.
8.
GieserT (2008) Embodiment, emotion and empathy: a phenomenological approach to apprenticeship learning. Anthropological Theory8(3): 299–318.
9.
GrønsethASDavisDL (eds) (2010) Mutuality and Empathy: Self and Other in the Ethnographic Encounter (Anthropology Matters), vol. 5. Wantage: Sean Kingston Publishing.
10.
HelliwellC (1996) Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse. In: JacksonM (ed.) Things as They Are: New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 128–148.
11.
HighH (2011) Melancholia and anthropology. American Ethnologist38(2): 217–233.
12.
HollanDWThroopCJ (2011) The anthropology of empathy: introduction. In: HollanDWThroopCJ (eds) The Anthropology of Empathy: Experiencing the Lives of Others in Pacific Societies. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1–21.
13.
JacksonM (1996) Introduction: phenomenology, radical empiricism, and anthropological critique. In: JacksonM (ed.) Things as They Are: New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1–50.
14.
JacksonM (1998) Minima Ethnographica: Intersubjectivity and the Anthropological Project. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
JosephidesL (2010) Speaking-with and feeling-with: the phenomenology of knowing the other. In: GrønsethASDavisDL (eds) Mututality and Empathy: Self and Other in the Ethnographic Encounter (Anthropology Matters), vol. 5. Wantage: Sean Kingston Publishing, 161–176.
16.
LadermanC (1994) The embodiment of symbols and the acculturation of the anthropologist. In: CsordasT (ed.) Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183–200.
17.
LohmannR (2011) Empathic perception and imagination among the Asabano: lessons for anthropology. In: HollanDWThroopCJ (eds) The Anthropology of Empathy: Experiencing the Lives of Others in Pacific Societies. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books.
18.
MacleanN (1984) Is gambling ‘Bisnis’?: the economic and political functions of gambling in the Jimi Valley. Social Analysis16: 44–59.
19.
MacleanN (1985) To develop our place: a political economy of the Maring. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of Anthropology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
MacleanN (1994) Freedom or autonomy: a modern Melanesian dilemma. Man (New Series)29(3): 667–688.
22.
MacleanN (2010) Globalisation and bridewealth rhetoric. Dialectical Anthropology34: 347–372.
23.
MageoJ (2011) Empathy and ‘As-If’ attachment in Samoa. In: HollanDWThroopCJ (eds) The Anthropology of Empathy: Experiencing the Lives of Others in Pacific Societies. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books, 69–93.
24.
PowdermakerH (1967) An agreeable man. The New York Review of Books9(8), 9November.
25.
RappaportR (1984 [1968]) Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 238–258.
26.
RidlerK (1996) If not the words: shared practical activity and friendship in fieldwork. In: JacksonM (ed.) Things as They Are: New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 238–258.
27.
RumseyA (2011) Empathy and anthropology: an afterword. In: HollanDWThroopCJ (eds) The Anthropology of Empathy: Experiencing the Lives of Others in Pacific Societies. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books, 215–224.
28.
SchutzA (1972 [1967]) The Phenomenology of the Social World (trans. WalshGLehnertF). London: Heinemann Educational Books.
29.
SternD (1985) The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.
30.
StockingGWJr (1983) The ethnographer’s magic: fieldwork in British anthropology from Tylor to Malinowski. In: StockingGWJr (ed.) Observers Observed: Essays on Ethnographic Fieldwork, vol. 1. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 70–120.
31.
StueberK (2006) Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
TomaselloM (1995) Joint attention as social cognition. In: MooreCDunhamPJ (eds) Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 103–130.
33.
ZahaviD (2005) Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First Person Perspective. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
34.
ZahaviD (2008) Simulation, projection and empathy. Consciousness and Cognition17(2): 514–522.
35.
ZahaviD (2010) Empathy, embodiment and interpersonal understanding: from Lipps to Schutz. Inquiry53(3): 285–306.
