This article examines methodological issues of emotion and allegiance in relation to researching, from archival sources, gender representation in mid-20th-century cases of women accused of murder. Through a discussion of four women’s cases, I explore this as a deeply ambivalent experience because the research induced both empathic and negative feelings towards the women. This seemed to conflict with my aims as a feminist researcher to highlight derogatory constructions of gender in the criminal justice system. I argue that a reflexive approach is necessary in order to carry out sensitive archival research and conclude that negotiating the attendant ambivalence and complexity deepens ethical engagement.
BallingerA (2000) Dead Woman Walking. Aldershot: Ashgate.
2.
BarnettB (2006) Medea in the media: narrative and myth in newspaper coverage of women who kill their children. Journalism7(4): 411–432.
3.
BlackmanSJ (2007) ‘Hidden Ethnography’: crossing emotional borders in qualitative accounts of young people’s lives. Sociology41(4): 699–716.
4.
BosworthM (2001) The past is a foreign country? Some methodological implications for doing historical criminology. British Journal of Criminology41(3): 431–442.
5.
BourkeJ (2003) Fear and anxiety: writing about emotion in modern history. History Workshop Journal55(1): 111–133.
6.
CampbellR (2002) Emotionally Involved: The Impact of Researching Rape. London: Routledge.
7.
CarlineA (2005) Women who kill their abusive partners: from sameness to gender construction. Liverpool Law Review26(1): 13–44.
8.
ChanW (2001) Women, Murder and Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
ClarkeS (2006) Theory and practice: psychoanalytic sociology as pscyho-social studies. Sociology40(6): 1153–1169.
10.
CockcroftT (2005) Using oral history to investigate police culture. Qualitative Research5(3): 365–384.
11.
Dickson-SwiftVJamesELKippenS. (2007) Doing sensitive research: what challenges do qualitative researchers face?Qualitative Research7(3): 327–353.
12.
Dickson-SwiftVJamesELKippenS. (2009) Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research9(1): 61–79.
13.
DobashREDobashRP (1998) Violent men and violent contexts. In: DobashREDobashRP (eds) Rethinking Violence against Women. London: Sage, 141–164.
14.
DouglasKSLyonDROgloffJRP (1997) The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors’ decisions in a murder trial: probative or prejudicial?Law and Human Behavior21(5): 485–501.
15.
EdneyR (2006) Contested narratives of penal knowledge: H Division Pentridge prison and the histories of imprisonment. Current Issues in Criminal Justice17(3): 362–379.
GodfreyB (2003) ‘Dear Reader I Killed Him’: ethical and emotional issues in researching convicted murderers through the analysis of interview transcripts. Oral History31(1): 54–64.
18.
GriffithsM (1995) Feminisms and the Self. London: Routledge.
19.
HallS (1996) New ethnicities. In: MorleyDChenK-H (eds) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge, 442–451.
20.
HarawayD (1990) A manifesto for cyborgs. In: NicholsonLJ (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge, 190–233.
21.
HekmanSJ (1999) The Future of Differences: Truth and Method in Feminist Research. Cambridge: Polity.
22.
HollandJ (2007) Emotions and research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology10(3): 195–209.
23.
HollwayWJeffersonT (2000) Doing Qualitative Research Differently. London: Sage.
24.
JansdotterA (2008) Seeking a useable methodology: the production of the Fin de Siecle prostitute. Qualitative Research8(3): 307–315.
25.
KellyL (1988) Surviving Sexual Violence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
26.
LeeRMRenzettiCM (1993) The problems of researching sensitive topics: an overview and introduction. In: RenzettiCMLeeRM (eds) Researching Sensitive Topics. London: Sage, 3–12.
27.
LewisRDobashREDobashRP. (2003) Researching homicide: methodological issues in the exploration of lethal violence. In: LeeRMStankoEA (eds) Researching Violence: Essays on Methodology and Measurement. London: Sage, 49–65.
28.
LieblingA (2001) Whose side are we on? Theory, practice and allegiances in prisons research. British Journal of Criminology41(3): 472–484.
29.
LieblingAStankoB (2001) Allegiance and ambivalence: some dilemmas in researching disorder and violence. British Journal of Criminology41(3): 421–430.
30.
LuffD (1999) Dialogue across the divides: ‘Moments of Rapport’ and power in feminist research with anti-feminist women. Sociology33(4): 687–703.
31.
MorrisTBlom-CooperL (1964) A Calendar of Murder. London: Michael Joseph.
32.
NicolsonD (1995) Telling tales: gender discrimination, gender construction and battered women who kill. Feminist Legal Studies3(2): 186–206.
33.
ObermanMMeyerC (2008) When Mothers Kill: Interviews from Prison. New York: New York University Press.
34.
PillowWSMayoC (2006) Toward understandings of feminist ethnography. In: Hesse-BiberSN (ed.) Handbook of Feminist Research. New York: Sage, 155–171.
35.
PlummerK (2001) Documents of Life 2: An Invitation to a Critical Humanism. London: Sage.
36.
PlummerK (2008) Studying sexualities for a better world? Ten years of sexualities. Sexualities11(1/2): 7–22.
37.
PresserL (2005) Negotiating power and narrative in research: implications for feminist methodology. Signs30(4): 2067–2090.
38.
PriorL (2003) Using Documents in Social Research. London: Sage.
39.
ProbynE (1993) Sexing the Self: Gendered Positions in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
40.
ReevesCL (2010) A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research10(3): 315–331.
41.
RenzettiC (1999) The challenge to feminism posed by women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. In: LambS (ed.) New Versions of Victims: Feminists Struggle with the Concept. New York: New York University Press, 42–56.
42.
RobertsonS (2005) What’s law got to do with it? Legal records and sexual histories. Journal of the History of Sexuality14(1/2): 161–185.
43.
ScottJ (1990) A Matter of Record. Cambridge: Polity.
44.
SealL (2009a) Issues of gender and class in the mirror newspapers’ campaign for the release of Edith Chubb. Crime, Media, Culture5(1): 57–78.
45.
SealL (2009b) Discourses of single women accused of murder: mid twentieth-century constructions of ‘Lesbians’ and ‘Spinsters’. Women’s Studies International Forum32(3): 209–218.
46.
SealL (2010) Women, Murder and Femininity: Gender Representations of Women Who Kill. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
47.
SteedmanC (1998) The space of memory: the archive. History of the Human Sciences11(4): 65–83.
48.
SteedmanC (2001) Dust: The Archive and Cultural History. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
49.
WalkerN (1965) Crime and Punishment in Britain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
50.
WiddowfieldR (2000) The place of emotions in academic research. Area32(2): 199–208.
51.
WincupE (2001) Feminist research with women awaiting trial: the effects on participants in the qualitative research process. In: GilbertKR (ed.) The Emotional Nature of Qualitative Research. London: CRC Press, 17–35.
