This article explores ethics committee review as part of a system of government directing the behaviour of researchers and possibilities of research. Drawing on the work of Halse and Honey (2007) it argues ethics committees represent one of the governing practices of an institutional discourse of ethical research. This discourse has constitutive effects for researcher identities that are ‘ethical’ and what in practice might represent ‘ethical’ research. This analysis is undertaken with reference to visual research with youth about ‘the sexual culture of schools’. How ethics review constituted this research as ‘risky’ and young people as ‘irresponsible’ and ‘recalcitrant’ is examined. These discursive practices undermined a youth-centred methodology committed to valuing the agency and competency of youth and left the researcher feeling she had acted ‘unethically’ towards participants. These effects demonstrate a paradox whereby compliance with ethics review can produce what this process seeks to prevent, ‘unethical’ researchers and research.
Beck, U. ( 1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
2.
Best, A. ( 2007) Representing Youth: Methodological Issues in Critical Youth Studies. New York: New York University Press.
3.
Crockett, M., Woolley, E. and Johnson, M. ( 2002) Sexuality and the Law. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Family Planning Association.
4.
Davies, B. ( 1997) ‘The Subject of Post-structuralism: A Reply to Alison Jones’, Gender and Education9(3): 271-83.
5.
Emmison, M. and Smith, P. ( 2000) Researching the Visual: Images: Objects, Contexts and Interactions in Social and Cultural Inquiry. London: Sage.
6.
Epstein, D. and Johnson, R. ( 1998) Schooling Sexualities. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7.
Epstein, D., O’Flynn, S. and Telford, D. ( 2003) Silenced Sexualities in Schools Universities and Universities . London: Trentham Books.
8.
Foucault, M. ( 1976) The History of Sexuality (Volume 1., trans. R. Hurley) . Penguin: Harmondsworth.
9.
Foucault, M. ( 1994a) ‘Governmentality’, pp. 201-22 in J. Faubian (ed.) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Volume 3). London: Penguin.
10.
Foucault, M. ( 1994b) ‘On the Government of the Living’, pp. 81-5 in P. Rabinow (ed.) Ethics: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Volume 1). London: Penguin.
11.
France, A. ( 2004) ‘Young People’, pp. 175-90 in S. Fraser, V. Lewis, S. Ding, M. Kellet and C. Robinson (eds) Doing Research with Children and Young People. London: Sage.
12.
Fraser, S., Lewis, V. , Ding, S., Kellet, M and Robinson, C. (eds) (2004) Doing Research with Children and Young People. London: Sage.
13.
Gavey, N. ( 1989) ‘Feminist Post-structuralism and Discourse Analysis’ , Psychology of Women Quarterly13: 459-75.
14.
Griffin, C. ( 2005) ‘Representations of the Young’, pp. 10-18 in J. Roche, S. Tucker, R. Thomson and R. Flynn (eds) Youth in Society. London: Sage.
15.
Halse, C. and Honey, A. ( 2007) ‘Rethinking Ethics Review as Institutional Discourse’ , Qualitative Inquiry13(3): 336-52.
16.
Harrington, C. and Lindy, I. ( 1999) ‘The Use of Reflexive Photography in the Study of the Freshman Year Experience’, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice1(1): 13-22.
17.
Heath, S., Charles, V., Crow, G. and Wiles, R. ( 2007) ‘Informed Consent, Gatekeepers and Go-Betweens: Negotiating Consent in Child and Youth-Orientated Institutions’, British Educational Research Journal33(3): 403-17.
18.
Hirst, J. ( 2003a) ‘Reconceptualising the "Problem" of Teenage Pregnancy and Young Parenting: Mediators of Problems for Teenage Mothers and Fathers from Minority Ethnic Communities’. Paper presented at ESA Conference, Murcia, Spain, 23-26 September.
19.
Hirst, J. ( 2003b) Voices of Experience: Muslim and African Caribbean Teenagers’ Insights on Pregnancy and Parenting. Sheffield: Julia Hirst.
20.
Hurworth, R. ( 2003) ‘Photo-Interviewing for Research’, Social Research Update40: 1-4. Guildford : Department of Sociology, University of Surrey.
21.
Jones, A. ( 1997) ‘Teaching Post-Structuralist Feminist Theory in Education; Student Resistances’, Gender and Education9: 261-9.
22.
Kehily, M. ( 2002) Sexuality, Gender and Schooling: Shifting Agendas in Social Learning. London: Routledge Falmer .
23.
Kehily, M. ( 2007) ‘A Cultural Perspective’, in M. Kehily (ed.) Understanding Youth: Perspectives, Identities and Practices. London: Sage in Association with The Open University.
24.
Lincoln, Y. and Tierney, G. ( 2004) ‘Qualitative Research and Institutional Review Boards’ , Qualitative Inquiry10(2): 219-34.
25.
Mac an Ghaill, M. ( 1994) The Making of Men. Buckingham: Open University Press.
26.
Mahruf, M., Shohel, C. and Howes, J. ( 2007) ‘Transition from Nonformal Schools: Learning Through Photo Elicitation in Educational Fieldwork in Bangladesh’, Visual Studies22(1): 53-61.
27.
Ministry of Health (2006) Operational Standard for Ethics Committees (Updated Edition). Wellington : Ministry of Health.
28.
Mizen, P. ( 2005) ‘A Little "Light Work"? Children’s Images of their Labour’, Visual Studies20(2): 124-39.
29.
Netsafe. The Internet Safety Group (2005) ‘The Text Generation Mobile Phones and New Zealand Youth: A Report of Results from the Internet Safety Group’s Survey of Teenage Mobile Phone Use’, Internet Safety Group Inc. URL: http:www.netsafe.org.nz
30.
Pearce, M. ( 2002) ‘Challenging the System: Rethinking Ethics Review of Social Research in Britain’s National Health Service’, pp. 43-58 in W.C. van den Hoonaard (ed.) Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
31.
Prosser, J. ( 2007) ‘Visual Methods and the Visual Culture of Schools’ , Visual Studies22(1): 13-30.
32.
Raggl, A. and Schratz, M. ( 2004) ‘Using Visuals to Release Pupils’ Voices: Emotional Pathways into Enhancing Thinking and Reflecting on Learning’ , pp. 147-62 in C. Pole (ed.) Seeing is Believing? Approaches to Visual Research. London: Elsevier .
33.
Rasmussen, M., Rofes, E. and Talburt, S. (eds) ( 2004) Youth and Sexualities: Pleasure, Subversion, and Insubordination In and Out of Schools. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
Renold, E. ( 2005) Girls, Boys and Junior Sexualities: Exploring Children’s Gender and Sexual Relationships in the Primary School. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
35.
Strathern, M. ( 2000) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge.
36.
Tolich, M. ( 2001) ‘Beyond an Unfortunate Experiment: Ethics for Small-Town New Zealand’, pp. 2-12 in M. Tolich (ed.) Research Ethics in Aotearoa New Zealand: Concepts, Practice, Critique. Auckland: Pearson Education.
37.
Valentine, G. ( 1999) ‘Being Seen and Heard? The Ethical Complexities of Working with Children and Young People at Home and at School’, Ethics , Place and Environment2(2): 142-55.
38.
Weedon, C. ( 1987) Feminist Practice and Post-Structuralist Theory (2nd Edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
Wiederman, M. ( 2002) ‘Institutional Review Boards and Conducting Sexuality Research’, pp. 479-504 in M. Wiederman and B. Whitley (eds) Handbook for Conducting Research on Human Sexuality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40.
Williams, R. ( 1961) The Long Revolution (London andNew York, Columbia University Press).
