The focus group is a research methodology in which a small group of participants
gathers to discuss a specified issue under the guidance of a moderator. The
discussions are tape-recorded, transcribed and analysed. Notably, the
interaction between focus group participants has seldom been evaluated,
analysed or discussed in empirical research. We argue that considering the focus
group in light of current research into interaction in problem-based learning (PBL)
tutorial groups would facilitate the deliberate exploitation of group processes in
designing focus groups, staging data collection and analysing and interpreting data.
When the analytical focus shifts from mere content analysis to an analysis of what
the participants themselves are trying to learn, one can explore not only what the
participants are talking about, but also how they are trying to understand and
conceptualise the issue under discussion.
Abrandt Dahlgren, M.
and
Öberg, G.
(2001) `
Questioning to Learn and Learning to Question: Structure and Function of
Problem-Based Learning Scenarios in Environmental Science Education
', Higher Education41(3):
263—82
.
2.
Agar, M.
and
MacDonald, J.
(1995) `
Focus Groups and Ethnography
', Human Organization54(1):
78—86
.
3.
Barbour, R.
and
Kitzinger, J.
(eds) (1999) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics,
Theory and Practice.
London: Sage
.
4.
Barrows, H.
(1988) The Tutorial Process.
Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois UniversitySchool of Medicine
.
5.
Billig, M.
(1996) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social
Psychology (2nd Edition).
London: Sage
.
6.
Clarke, S.
(2002) `
Developing Quality Participation in Tutorial
', in A. Goody, J. Herrington and M. Northcote (eds) Proceedings
of the 2002 Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and
Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) , Perth,
Australia. URL (consulted 21 February 2006): http://www.herdsa.org.au/publications
7.
Collins, S.
and
Marková, I.
(2004) `
Les énoncés collaboratifs: nouvelle
méthode dans l'étude des données issues des
“focus groups
”', Bulletin de Psychologie57:
291—98
.
8.
De Grave, W.
,
Dolmans, D.
and Van der
Vleuten, C.
(2001) `
Student Perceptions About the Occurrence of Critical Incidents in Tutorial
Groups', MedicalTeacher23(1):
49—54
.
9.
Dolmans, D.
,
Wolfhagen, I.
,
van der Vleuten, C.
and
Wijnen, W.
(2001) `
Solving Problems with Group Work in Problem-Based Learning: Hold On to the Philosophy
', Medical Education35:
884—9
.
10.
Goffman, E.
(1961) Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of
Interaction .
Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
11.
Hare, P.
(1962) Handbook of Small Group Research.
New York: Free Press of Glencoe
.
12.
Hmelo-Silver, C.
(2004) `
Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?
', Educational Psychology Review16(3):
235—66
.
13.
Hydén, L.
and
Bülow, P.
(2003) `
Who's Talking: Drawing Conclusions From Focus Groups. Some Methodological Considerations
', International Journal of Social Research Methodology6(4):
305—21
.
14.
Jarrett, R.
(1993) `Focus Group Interviewing with Low-Income Minority
Populations: A Research Experience', in
D. Morgan
(ed.) Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art, pp.
184 —201.
Newbury Park, CA : Sage
.
15.
Jovchelovitch, S.
(2001) `Contextualising Focus Groups: Understanding Groups
and Cultures', Paper prepared for the fifth meeting of the group
`Conversation et langage', Laboratoire Européen de Psychologie Sociale,
Paris
.
16.
Kitzinger, J.
(1994) `
The Methodology of Focus Groups: The Importance of Interaction Between
Research Participants
', Sociology of Health and Illness16(1):
103—21
.
17.
Kitzinger, J.
and
Barbour, R.
(1999) `Introduction: The Challenge and Promise of Focus
Groups', in
R. Barbour
and
J. Kitzinger
(eds) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and
Practice, pp. 1 —20.
London: Sage
.
18.
Kitzinger, J.
and
Farquhar, C.
(1999) `The Analytical Potential of “Sensitive
Moments” in Focus Group Discussions', in
R. Barbour
and
J. Kitzinger
(eds) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and
Practice, pp. 156 —72.
London: Sage
.
19.
Krueger, R.
(1998) Developing Questions for Focus Groups. Focus group
kit, no. 3.
Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage
.
20.
Leseman, P.
,
Rollenberg, L.
and
Gebhart, E.
(2000) `Co-construction in Kindergartners' Free Play: Effects
on Social, Individual and Didactic Factors', in H. Cowie and G. Van der
Aalsvoort (eds) Social Interaction in Learning and Instruction: The Meaning of
Discourse for the Construction of KnowledgeAmsterdam : Pergamon
.
21.
Linell, P.
,
Wibeck, V.
,
Adelswärd, V.
and
Bakshi, A.
(2001) `
Arguing in Conversation as a Case of Distributed Cognition: Discussing
Biotechnology in Focus Groups
', in E. Németh (ed.) Cognition in Language Use:
Selected Papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol.
I, pp. 243—55. Amsterdam: International Pragmatics Association.
22.
Margetson, D.
(1993) `
Understanding Problem-Based Learning
', Educational Philosophy and Theory25(1):
40—57
.
23.
Marková, I.
(2004) `
Langage et communication en psychologie sociale: dialoguer dans les
“focus groups
”', Bulletin de Psychologie57:
231—36
.
24.
Marková, I.
,
Linell, P.
,
Grossen, M.
and
Salazar Orvig, A.
(2006) Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared
Knowledge.
London: Equinox
.
25.
Morgan, D.
(1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
.
26.
Morgan, D.
(1996) `
Focus Groups
', Annual Review of Sociology22:
129—52
.
27.
Morgan, D.
(1998) The Focus Group Guidebook (Focus Group Kit, no.
1).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
28.
Moscovici, S.
(1984) `The Phenomenon of Social Representations', in
R. Far r
and
S. Moscovici
(eds) Social Representations, pp. 3
—69.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
29.
Myers, G.
(1998) `
Displaying Opinions: Topics and Disagreement in Focus Groups
', Language in Society27(1):
85—111
.
30.
Myers, G.
and
Macnaghten, P.
(1999) `Can Focus Groups be Analysed as Talk?', in
R. Barbour
and
J. Kitzinger
(eds) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and
Practice, pp. 173 —85.
London: Sage
.
31.
Regehr, G.
and
Norman, G.
(1996) `
Issues in Cognitive Psychology: Implications for Professional Education
', Academic Medicine71(9):
988—1001
.
32.
Russell, K.
(1999) `
The Problem of the Problem and Perplexity
', in proceedings of PBL: A Way Forward. The 1999 PBL
conference , University of Quebec, 7—10 July,
Montreal , Canada.
33.
Savin-Baden, M.
(2000) Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education: Untold
Stories.
Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press
.
34.
Savin-Baden, M.
(2003) Facilitating Problem-Based Learning: Illuminating
Perspectives.
Maidenhead: Open University Press
.
35.
Schmidt, H.
(1993) `
Foundations of Problem-Based Learning: Some Exploratory Notes
', Medical Education27:
422—32
.
36.
Schmidt, H.
,
De Volder, M.
,
De Grave, W.
,
Moust, J.
and
Patel, V.
(1989) `
Exploratory Models in the Processing of Science Texts: The Role of Prior
Knowledge Activation Through Small-Group Discussion
', Journal of Educational Psychology81:
610—19
.
37.
Smithson, J.
(2000) `
Using and Analysing Focus Groups: Limitations and Possibilities'
, International Journal of Social Research Methodology3(2):
103—19
.
38.
Stevens, P.E.
(1996) `
Focus Groups: Collecting Aggregate-Level Data to Understand Community
Health Phenomena
', Public Health Nursing13(3):
170—6
.
39.
van Boxtel, C.
(2000) Collaborative Concept Learning: Collaborative Learning
Tasks, Student Interaction, and the Learning of Physics Concepts.
Enschede
, Netherlands:
PrintPartners Ipskamp
.
40.
Visschers-Pleijers, A.
,
Dolmans, D.
,
Wolfhagen, I.
and
Van Der Vleuten, C.
(2004) `
Exploration of a Method to Analyze Group Interactions in Problem-based
Learning', MedicalTeacher26(5):
471—8
.
41.
Wibeck, V.
(2002) '
Genmat i focus. Analyser av fokusgruppssamtal om
genförändrade livsmedel' [`Genetically modified food
in focus: analyses of focus group discussions']
, PhD dissertation,
Linköping University
(Linköping Studies in Arts and Science,
260
).
Linköping
, Sweden:
The Tema Institute
.
42.
Wibeck, V.
(2004) `
Exploring Focus Groups: Analysing Focus Group Data About Genetically
Modified Food
', in K. Aijmer (ed.)
Dialogue Analysis VIII: Understanding and Misunderstanding in Dialogue
. Selected Papers from the 8th IADA Conference, Göteborg2001 , pp. 287 —98.
Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
43.
Wibeck, V.
,
Adelswärd, V.
and
Linell, P.
(2004) `
Comprendre la complexité: Les focus groups comme espace de
pensée et d'argumentation sur les aliments
génétiquement modifiés
', Bulletin de Psychologie57:
253—61
.
44.
Wibeck, V.
,
Johansson, M.
,
Larsson, A.
and
Öberg, G.
(2006) `“
Communicative Aspects of Environmental Management by
Objectives”: Examples from the Swedish Context', EnvironmentalManagement37:
461—469
.
45.
Wilkerson, L.
(1996) `
Tutors and Small Groups in Problem-Based Learning: Lessons from the Literature
', New Directions for Teaching and Learning68:
23—32
.
46.
Wilkinson, S.
(1998a) `
Focus Group Methodology: A Review
', International Journal of Social Research Methodology1(3):
181—203
.
47.
Wilkinson, S.
(1998b) `
Focus Groups in Health Research: Exploring the Meanings of Health and Illness
', Journal of Health Psychology3(3):
329—48
.
48.
Wilkinson, S.
(1999) `
Focus Groups: A Feminist Method
', Psychology of Women Quarterly23(2):
221—44
.
49.
Yoshihama, M.
(2002) `
Breaking the Web of Abuse and Silence: Voices of Battered Women in Japan
', Social Work47(4):
389—400
.
