The qualitative study of global elites is a challenging task and in this article we
demonstrate that the difficulties of elite research can be handled in a more
transparent and productive manner by engaging feminist methodologies. Drawing on one
author’s recent experiences in the field interviewing well-placed actors
involved with the dispute settlement mechanism of the World Trade Organization, we
argue that feminist methodologies allow the successful navigation of the authority
relationship in the process of studying elites. Critical examination of researcher
positionality and the micropolitics of the research encounter leads to a
reconceptualization of the concept of ‘studying up’ as it
obscures the complexities of the power relationships in both research and social
life. We conclude with a call for deeper qualitative attention to global elites that
is informed by feminist methodologies.
Bhavnani, K.-K.
(1991) Talking Politics: A Psychological Framing for Views
from Youth in Britain.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
2.
Bhavnani, K.-K.
(1994) ‘Tracing the Contours: Feminist Research
and Feminist Objectivity’, in
H. Afshar
and
M. Maynard
(eds) The Dynamics of ‘Race’ and Gender: Some
Feminist Interventions, pp. 26-40.
London: Taylor & Francis
.
3.
Bloom, L. R.
(1998) Under the Sign of Hope: Feminist Methodology and
Narrative Interpretation.
Albany: State University of New York Press
.
4.
Bonacich, E.
and
Appelbaum, R. P.
(2000) Behind the Label: Inequality in the Los Angeles
Apparel Industry.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
5.
Burawoy, M.
(2000) Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and
Imaginations in a Postmodern World.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
6.
Casper, M. J.
(1997)
‘Feminist Politics and Fetal Surgery: Adventures of a Research
Cowgirl on the Reproductive Frontier’
, Feminist Studies23(2):
233-262
.
7.
Collins, P. H.
(2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and
the Politics of Empowerment.
New York: Routledge
.
8.
Cookson, P.
(1994) ‘The Power Discourse: Elite Narratives
and Educational Policy Formation’, in
G. Walford
(ed.) Researching the Powerful in Education, pp.
116-130.
London: UCL Press
.
9.
Dahl, R. A.
(1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American
City.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
10.
Dankoski, M. E.
(2000)
‘What Makes Research Feminist?’
, Journal of Feminist Family Therapy12(1):
3-19
.
11.
DeVault, M. L.
(1996)
‘Talking Back to Sociology: Distinctive Contributions of Feminist Methodology’
, Annual Review of Sociology22:
29-50
.
12.
Dezalay, Y.
and
Garth, B. G.
(1996) Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial
Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order.
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
.
13.
Dezalay, Y.
and
Garth, B. G.
(2002) The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers,
Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
14.
Domhoff, G. W.
(1967) Who Rules America?Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
.
15.
Domhoff, G. W.
(1990) The Power Elite and the State: How Policy is Made in
America.
New York: A. de Gruyter
.
16.
England, K. V. L.
(2002) ‘Interviewing Elites: Cautionary Tales
about Researching Women Managers in Canada’s Banking
Industry’, in
P. J. Moss
(ed.) Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods, pp.
200-213.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
17.
Fitz, J.
and
Halpin, D.
(1994) ‘Ministers and Mandarins: Educational
Research in Elite Settings’, in
G. Walford
(ed.) Researching the Powerful in Education, pp.
32-50.
London: UCL Press
.
18.
Forsythe, D.
(2001) Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the
World of Artificial Intelligence.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
19.
Foucault, M.
(1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
New York: Pantheon Books
.
20.
Gordon, A.
(1997) Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological
Imagination.
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
.
21.
Gramsci, A.
(1992) Prison Notebooks.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
22.
Haraway, D. J.
(1988) ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science
Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial
Perspective’, in
E. F. Keller
and
H. E. Longino
(eds) Feminism and Science, pp. 249-263.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
23.
Haraway, D. J.
(2004) The Haraway Reader.
New York: Routledge
.
24.
Harding, S. G.
(1987) ‘Introduction: Is there a Feminist
Method?’, in
S. G. Harding
(ed.) Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, pp.
1-14.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
.
25.
Harding, S. G.
(1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from
Women’s Lives.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
26.
Harding, S. G.
and
Hintikka, M. B.
(2003) Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on
Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science.
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
.
27.
Hartsock, N. C. M.
(1983) Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical
Materialism.
New York: Longman
.
28.
Hermanowicz, J. C.
(2002)
‘The Great Interview: 25 Strategies for Interviewing People in Bed’
, Qualitative Sociology25(4):
479-499
.
29.
Hertz, R.
and
Imber, J. B.
(1995) Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
30.
Hirsch, P. M.
(1995) ‘Tales from the Field: Learning from
Researchers’ Accounts’, in
R. Hertz
and
J. B. Imber
(eds) Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods, pp.
72-80.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
31.
Holmes, D. R.
and
Marcus, G. E.
(2005) ‘Cultures of Expertise and the Management
of Globalization: Toward the Refunctioning of Ethnography’,
in
A. Ong
and
S. J. Collier
(eds) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as
Anthropological Problems, pp. 235-252.
Malden, MA: Blackwell
.
32.
Jackall, R.
(1988) Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
33.
Lukes, S.
(2005) Power: A Radical View.
New York: Palgrave Macmillan
.
34.
Mann, M.
(1986) The Sources of Social Power.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
35.
Marcus, G. E.
(1983) Elites: Ethnographic Issues.
Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press
.
36.
McMichael, P.
(2004) Development and Social Change: A Global
Perspective.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press
.
37.
Mills, C. W.
(1956) White Collar: The American Middle Classes.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
38.
Mills, C. W.
(1957) The Power Elite.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
39.
Mills, C. W.
(1963) Power, Politics, and People; The Collected Essays of
C. Wright Mills.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
40.
Nader, L.
(1972) ‘Up the
Anthropologist’, in
D. H. Hymes
(ed.) Reinventing Anthropology, pp. 284-311.
New York: Pantheon Books
.
41.
Nader, L.
(1977)
‘Studying Up’
, Psychology Today11(Sept):
132-132
.
42.
Naples, N. A.
(2003) Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis,
and Activist Research.
New York: Routledge
.
43.
Odendahl, T.
and
Shaw, A. M.
(2002) ‘Interviewing Elites’,
in
J. F. Gubrium
and
J. A. Holstein
(eds) Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method,
pp. 299-316.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
44.
Poulantzas, N.
(2000) State, Power, Socialism.
London: Verso
.
45.
Reinharz, S.
and
Davidman, L.
(1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
46.
Schwartzman, H. B.
(1993) Ethnography in Organizations.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
.
47.
Sklair, L.
(2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
48.
Skocpol, T.
(1979) States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis
of France, Russia, and China.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
49.
Van Maanen, J.
(1988) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
50.
Walford, G.
(1994) ‘A New Focus on the
Powerful’, in
G. Walford
(ed.) Researching the Powerful in Education, pp.
2-11.
London: UCL Press
.
