Community participation has become the new orthodoxy within urban regeneration policy
in the UK. Yet, it remains a perennial problem for policymakers, especially at the
neighbourhood level. A major reason for this, it is argued, is that policymakers
often set up local partnerships with insufficient knowledge of the
‘culture’ (i.e. structure, processes, practices, relations and
agents) of the neighbourhoods and communities they seek to regenerate and involve in
decision-making. Furthermore, policymakers also lack a critically reflective
understanding of their own cultural practices. It is argued that collaborative
planning theory and applied ethnography offer policymakers a way forward in
realising more effective community participation. Collaborative planning and applied
ethnography provide a governance and methodological framework that have the
potential to promote inclusionary argumentation and consensus building, and give
partnership stakeholders an opportunity to become more aware and critically
reflective of their cultural relations, practices and processes, thus paving the way
forward for more effective community participation.
Anastacio, J.
,
Gidley, B.
,
Hart, L.
,
Keith, M.
,
Mayo, M.
and
Kowarzik, U.
(2000) Reflecting Realities: Participants’
Perspectives on Integrated Communities and Sustainable Development.
Bristol: The Policy Press
.
2.
Anderson, N.
(1961) The Hobo: The Sociology of the Homeless Man.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
3.
Atkinson, R.
(1997a)
‘Countering Urban Social Exclusion: The Role of Community
Participation in Urban Regeneration’
, Regional Frontiers Conference, European Universitat Viadrina
Frankfurt Oder, 20-23 September.
4.
Atkinson, R.
(1997b)
‘The New Urban Governance and Urban Regeneration: Managing
Community Participation’
, European Urban Research Association Seminar - Governing Cities:
International Perspectives, Brussels,
18-19 September.
5.
Atkinson, R.
(1999)
‘Discourses of Partnership and Empowerment in Contemporary
British Urban Regeneration’
, Urban Studies36(1):
59-72
.
6.
Atkinson, R.
(2003) ‘Addressing Urban Social Exclusion
through Community Involvement in Urban Regeneration’, in
R. Imrie
and
M. Raco
(eds) Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy,
pp. 101-120.
Bristol: The Policy Press
.
7.
Ball, M.
(2004)
‘Co-operation with the Community in Property-led Regeneration’
, Journal of Property Research21(2):
119-142
.
8.
Ball, M.
and
Maginn, P. J.
(2005)
‘Urban Change and Conflict: Evaluating the Role of Partnerships
in Urban Regeneration in the UK’
, Housing Studies20(1):
9-28
.
9.
Ball, M.
,
Le Ny, L.
and
Maginn, P. J.
(2003)
‘Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property
Agents’ Perspectives’
, Urban Studies40(11):
2239-2253
.
10.
Becker, H. S.
(1967)
‘Whose Side Are We On?’
, Social Problems14:
239-247
.
11.
Booher, D. E
and
Innes, J. E.
(2002)
‘Network Power in Collaborative Planning’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research21(3):
221-236
.
12.
Brewer, J.
with
Magee, K.
(1991) Inside the RUC: Routine Policing in a Divided
Society.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
13.
Burton, P.
(2003) Community Involvement in Neighbourhood Regeneration:
Stairway to Heaven or Road to Nowhere?Bristol/Glasgow: ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research
.
14.
Carley, M.
,
Hastings, A.
,
Kirk, K.
and
Young, R.
(2000b) Urban Regeneration Through Partnership: A Study in
Nine Urban Regions in England, Scotland and Wales.
Bristol/York: The Policy Press/Joseph Rowntree Foundation
.
15.
Carley, M.
,
Campbell, M.
,
Kearns, A.
,
Wood, M.
and
Young, R.
(2000a) Regeneration in the 21st Century: Policies Into
Practice: An Overview of the JRF Area Regeneration Programme.
Bristol: The Policy Press
.
16.
Chambers, E.
(1985) Applied Anthropology: A Practical Guide.
Prospect Heights: Waveland Press
.
17.
Chambers, E.
(2000) ‘Applied Ethnography’,
in
N. K. Denzin
and
Y. S. Lincoln
(eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp.
851-869.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
18.
Cohen, A. P.
(1985) The Symbolic Construction of Community.
London: Routledge
.
19.
Connolly, P.
and
Troyna, B.
(eds) (1998) Researching Racism in Education: Politics,
Theory and Practice.
Buckingham: Open University Press
.
20.
Cowan, D.
and
Halliday, S.
with
Hunter, C.
,
Maginn, P. J.
and
Naylor, L.
(2003) The Appeal of Internal Review.
Oxford: Hart Publishing
.
21.
Denzin, N. K.
and
Lincoln, Y. S.
(1994) ‘Introduction: Entering the Field of
Qualitative Research’, in
N. K. Denzin
and
Y. S. Lincoln
(eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp.
1-17.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
22.
DETR
(1998a) New Deal for Communities: Phase 1 Proposals -
Guidance for Pathfinder Applicants.
London: DETR
.
23.
DETR
(1998b) Single Regeneration Budget Bidding Guidance: A Guide
for Partnerships.
London: DETR
.
24.
DTLR
(2002) Collaboration and Co-ordination in Area-Based
Initiatives: Final Report to the Department of Transport, Local Government and
the Regions.
London: DTLR
.
25.
Fetterman, D. M.
(1989) Ethnography: Step by Step.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
.
26.
Fielding, N.
(1981) The National Front.
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
.
27.
Fielding, N.
(1991) Police and Social Conflict.
London: Athlone Press
.
28.
Foley, P.
and
Martin, S.
(2000)
‘A New Deal for the Community? Public Participation in
Regeneration and Local Service Delivery’
, Policy and Politics28(4):
479-491
.
29.
Foster, P.
(1990) Policy and Practice in Multicultural and Anti-racist
Education: A Case Study of a Multi-ethnic Comprehensive School.
London: Routledge
.
30.
Garot, R.
(2004)
‘“You’re Not a Stone”: Emotional
Sensitivity in a Bureaucratic Setting’
, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography33(6):
735-766
.
31.
Geertz, C.
(1973) The Interpretation of Culture: Selected Essays.
New York: Basic Books
.
32.
Gouldner, A. W.
(1973) For Sociology.
Harmondsworth: Penguin
.
33.
Grzyb, G. J.
(1990)
‘Deskilling, Decollectivization, and Diesels: Toward a New Focus
in the Study of Changing Skills’
, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography19(2):
163-187
.
34.
Hammersley, M.
(1992) What’s Wrong with Ethnography:
Methodological Explorations.
London: Routledge
.
35.
Hammersley, M.
(2000) Taking Sides in Social Research: Essays on
Partisanship and Bias.
London: Routledge
.
36.
Hastings, A.
(1996)
‘Unravelling the Process of “Partnership” in
Urban Regeneration Policy’
, Urban Studies33(2):
253-268
.
37.
Hastings, A.
and
McArthur, A.
(1995) ‘A Comparative Assessment of Government
Approaches to Partnership with the Local Community’, in
R. Hambleton
and
H. Thomas
(eds) Urban Policy and Evaluation: Challenge and Change, pp.
175-194.
London: Paul Chapman
.
38.
Hastings, A.
,
McArthur, A.
and
McGregor, A.
(1996) Less than Equal? Community Organisations and Estate
Regeneration Partnerships.
Bristol: The Policy Press
.
39.
Healey, P.
(1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented
Societies.
London: Macmillan
.
40.
Healey, P.
(2003)
‘Collaborative Planning in Perspective’
, Planning Theory2(2):
101-123
.
41.
Hughes, J.
and
Carmichael, P.
(1998)
‘Building Partnerships in Urban Regeneration: A Case Study from Belfast’
, Community Development Journal33(3):
205-225
.
42.
Innes, J. E.
(2004)
‘Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics’
, Planning Theory3(1):
5-20
.
43.
Jones, P. S.
(2003)
‘Urban Regeneration’s Poisoned Chalice: Is there an
Impasse in (Community) Participation-based Policy?’
, Urban Studies40(3):
581-601
.
44.
Lilford, R. J.
and
Braunholtz, D.
(2003)
‘Reconciling the Quantitative and Qualitative Traditions - the
Bayesian Approach’
, Public Money & ManagementJuly:
203-208
.
45.
Lowndes, V.
and
Sullivan, H.
(2004)
‘Like a Horse and Carriage or a Fish on a Bicycle: How Well Do
Local Partnerships and Public Participation Go Together?’
, Local Government Studies30(1):
51-74
.
46.
Lyon, E.
(1997)
‘Applying Ethnography’
, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography26(1):
3-27
.
47.
Mackintosh, M.
(1992)
‘Partnership: Issues of Policy and Negotiation’
, Local Economy7(3):
210-224
.
48.
Maginn, P. J.
(2004) Urban Regeneration, Community Power and the
(In)Significance of ‘Race’.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
49.
Malinowski, B.
(1948) Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays.
New York: Natural History Press
.
50.
Malinowski, B.
(1967) A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term.
New York: Harcourt Brace
.
51.
McGuirk, P. M.
(2001)
‘Situating Communicative Planning Theory: Context, Power, and Knowledge’
, Environment and Planning A33(2):
195-217
.
52.
Mead, M.
(1960a) Coming of Age in Samoa: A Psychological Study of
Primitive Youth for Western Civilization.
New York: Mentor
.
53.
Mead, M.
(1960b) Growing Up in New Guinea: A Comparative Study of
Primitive Education.
New York: Mentor
.
54.
North, P.
(2003) ‘Communities at the Heart? Community
Action and Urban Policy in the UK’, in
R. Imre
and
M. Raco
(eds) Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy,
pp. 121-138.
Bristol: The Policy Press
.
55.
ODPM
(2003) Searching for Solid Foundations: Community Involvement
and Urban Policy.
London: ODPM
.
56.
Park, R. E.
,
Burgess, E. W.
and
McKenzie, R. D.
(eds) (1967) The City.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
57.
Rist, R.
(1984) ‘On the Application of Qualitative
Research to the Policy Process: An Emergent Linkage’, in
L. Barton
and
S. Walker
(eds) Social Crisis and Educational Research, pp.
153-170.
London: Croom Helm
.
58.
Rist, R.
(2000) ‘Influencing the Policy Process with
Qualitative Research’, in
N. K. Denzin
and
Y. S. Lincoln
(eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp.
1001-1017.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
59.
Savage, M.
,
Warde, A.
and
Ward, K.
(2003) Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity
(2nd Edition).
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
60.
SEU
(1998) Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for
Neighbourhood Renewal.
London: Social Exclusion Unit
.
61.
SEU
(2000) Minority Ethnic Issues in Social Exclusion and
Neighbourhood Renewal.
London: Social Exclusion Unit
.
62.
SEU
(2001) A New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal: National
Strategy Action Plan.
London: SEU
.
63.
Shaw, I. F.
(1999) Qualitative Evaluation.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
64.
Skelcher, C.
,
McCabe, A.
,
Lowndes, V.
and
Nanton, P.
(1996) Community Networks in Urban Regeneration.
Bristol: The Policy Press
.
65.
Spencer, L.
,
Ritchie, J.
,
Lewis, J.
and
Dillon, L.
(2003) Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for
Assessing Research Evidence.
London: Government Chief Social
Researcher’s Office
.
66.
Taussik, J.
and
Smalley, J.
(1998)
‘Partnerships in the 1990s: Derby’s Successful City
Challenge Bid’
, Planning Practice and Research13(3):
283-297
.
67.
Taylor, M.
(2002) Public Policy in the Community.
London: Palgrave
.
68.
Thomas, W. I.
and
Znaniecki, F.
(1958) The Polish Peasant in Europe and America.
New York: Dover
.
69.
Thompson, W. B.
(2001)
‘Policy Making Through Thick and Thin: Thick Description as a
Methodology for Communications and Democracy’
, Policy Sciences34(1):
63-77
.
70.
Thrasher, F. M.
(1963) A Study of 1,313 Gangs in Chicago.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
71.
Vidich, A.
and
Lyman, S.
(1994) ‘Qualitative Methods: Their History in
Sociology and Anthropology’, in
N. K. Denzin
and
Y. S. Lincoln
(eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp.
23-59.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
72.
Wacquant, L.
(2002)
‘The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration’
, Ethnography3(4):
371-397
.
73.
Waste, R. J.
(ed.) (1986) Community Power: Directions for Future
Research.
London: Sage
.
74.
Whyte, W. F.
(1991) Participatory Action Research.
London: Sage
.
75.
Wirth, L.
(1956) The Ghetto.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
76.
Yin, R.
(1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
.
77.
Zorbaugh, H. W.
(1929) The Gold Coast and The Slum.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
