The survivability of ‘traditional’ methods within
computer-mediated settings is dependent upon their capacity to be utilized and
adapted to the technology that mediates human interaction online. This article
addresses the established focus group method and evaluates its success in online
applications, using as examples two quite different research projects. The first,
drawn from research into the employment experiences of inflammatory bowel disease
sufferers exemplifies the use of asynchronous online focus groups, identifying key
practical issues such as online moderation and the analysis of digital data. In
contrast the second study, into deviance within online communities, provides an
example of how synchronous forms of online focus groups, held within 3D graphical
environments, create further challenges for the researcher, highlighting unique
ethical considerations of conducting fieldwork in cyberspace. The article draws
together the authors’ experiences of applying the method to offer insights
into the viability and practicability of online focus groups.
Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR)
(2002) ‘Ethical Decision Making and Internet
Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working
Committee’, URL (consulted 24 June 2005): http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
2.
Barnes, S.B.
(2004) ‘Issues of Attribution and Identification
in Online Social Research’, in
M.D. Johns
,
S-L.S. Chen
and
G.J. Hall
(eds) Online Social Research, pp. 203-222.
New York: Peter Lang
.
3.
Baym, N.
(1995a) ‘The Emergence of Community in
Computer-Mediated Communication’, in
S. Jones
(ed.) CyberSociety, pp. 138-163.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
.
4.
Baym, N.
(1995b)
‘The Performance of Humor in Computer-Mediated Communication’
, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication1(2), URL (consulted 24 June 2005): http://www.usc.edu/dept/annenberg/vol1/issue2/baym.html
5.
Bloor, M.
,
Frankland, J.
,
Thomas, M.
and
Robson, K.
(2001) Focus Groups in Social Research.
London: Sage
.
6.
Correll, S.
(1995)
‘The Ethnography of an Electronic Bar: The Lesbian Café’
, The Journal of Contemporary Ethnography24(3):
270-298
.
7.
Denscombe, M.
(2003) The Good Research Guide (2nd edition).
Milton Keynes: Open University Press
.
8.
Gatson, S.N.
and
Zweerink, A.
(2004)
‘Ethnography Online: “Natives” Practicing and
Inscribing Community’
, Qualitative Research4(2):
179-200
.
9.
Hammersley, M.
and
Atkinson, P.
(1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice (2nd
edition).
London: Routledge
.
10.
Hine, C.
(2000) Virtual Ethnography.
London: Sage
.
11.
Johns M.D
,
Chen, S-L.S
and
Hall, G.J.
(eds) (2004) Online Social Research.
New York: Peter Lang
.
12.
Joinson, A.N.
(1998) ‘Causes and Effects of Disinhibition on
the Internet’, in
J. Gackenbach
(ed.) The Psychology of the Internet, pp.
43-60.
New York: Academic Press
.
13.
Jones, S.
(2004) ‘Ethics and Internet
Studies’, in
M.D. Johns
,
S-L.S. Chen
and
G.J. Hall
(eds) Online Social Research, pp. 179-186.
New York: Peter Lang
.
14.
Kiesler, S.
and
Sproull, L.
(1992)
‘Group Decision Making and Communication Technology’
, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes52(1):
96-123
.
15.
Kitzinger, J.
(1994)
‘The Methodology of Focus Groups: The Importance of Interaction
between Research Participants’
, Sociology of Health and Illness16(1):
103-121
.
16.
LeBosco, K.
(2004) ‘Managing Visibility, Intimacy and Focus
in Online Critical Ethnography’, in
M.D. Johns
,
S-L.S. Chen
and
G.J. Hall
(eds) Online Social Research, pp. 63-80.
New York: Peter Lang
.
17.
Mann, C.
and
Stewart, F.
(2000) Internet Communications and Qualitative
Research.
London: Sage
.
18.
Markham, A.
(1998) Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual
Space.
Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
.
19.
McLaughlin, J.
(2000)
‘The Name Still Remains the Same’
, WebNet Journal: Internet Technologies, Applications & Issues2(1):
68-70
.
20.
Miller, R.L.
and
Brewer, J.D.
(eds) (2003) The A-Z of Social Research.
London: Sage
.
21.
Morgan, D.
(1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
.
22.
Murray, P.
(1997)
‘Using Virtual Focus Groups in Qualitative Health Research’
, Qualitative Health Research7(4):
542-549
.
23.
NUA
(2004) ‘Internet Survey’, URL
(consulted 24 June 2005): http://www.nua.com/surveys/how_many_online/index.html
24.
Prandy, S.L.
,
Norris, D.
,
Lester, J.
and
Hoch, D.B.
(2001)
‘Expanding the Guidelines for Electronic Communication with
Patients: Application to a Specific Tool’
, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association8(4)
344-348
:.
25.
Rezabek, R.
(2000)
‘Online Focus Groups: Electronic Discussions for Research’
, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social
Research [On-line Journal] 1(1), URL (consulted 24 June
2005): http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/fqs-texte/1-00/1-00rezabek-e.htm
26.
Robson, K. (1999) ‘Employment Experiences of Ulcerative Colitis and
Crohn’s Disease Sufferers’, unpublished PhD thesis, University
of Wales Cardiff.
27.
Robson, K.
and
Robson, M.
(1999) ‘Your Place or Mine? Ethics, the
Researcher and the Internet’, in
T. Welland
and
L. Pugsley
(eds) Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research, pp.
94-107.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
28.
Roehl, B.
(1996)
‘Shared Worlds’
, VR News5(8):
14-19
.
29.
Roehl, B.
(1997)
‘Shared Worlds’
, VR News6(9):
10-15
.
30.
Schroeder, R.
(1997)
‘Networked Worlds: Social Aspects of Multi-User Virtual Reality Technology’
, Sociological Research Online2(4), URL (consulted 24 June 2005): http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/4/5.html
31.
Sharf, B.
(1999) ‘Beyond Netiquette: The Ethics of Doing
Naturalistic Discourse Research on the Internet’, in
S. Jones
(ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining
the Net, pp. 243-256.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
32.
Sternberg, J.
(1998)
‘It’s All in the Timing: Synchronous Versus
Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication’
, paper presented at 3rd Annual Conference of the New Jersey
Communication Association Montclair, New Jersey, URL
(consulted 24 June 2005): http://homepages.nyu.edu/%7Ejs15/p-time.htm
33.
Stewart, F.
,
Eckermann, E.
and
Zhou, K.
(1998)
‘Using the Internet in Qualitative Public Heath Research: A
Comparison of Chinese and Australian Young Women’s Perceptions of
Tobacco Use’
, Internet Journal of Health Promotion, URL (consulted 24 June
2005): http://www.monash.edu.au/heath/IJHP/1998/12
34.
Stone, A.R.
(1995) ‘Sex and Death Among the Disembodied: VR,
Cyberspace and the Nature of Academic Discourse’, in
S.L. Star
(ed.) The Cultures of Computing, pp.
243-255.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
35.
Williams, M. (2003) ‘Virtually Criminal: Deviance and Harm within
Online Environments’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wales Cardiff.
36.
Witmer, D.F.
,
Colman, R.W.
and
Katzman, S.L.
(1999) ‘From Paper-and-Pencil to
Screen-and-Keyboard’, in
S. Jones
(ed.) Doing Internet Research, pp. 145-161.
London: Sage
.
