This article explores tensions in the study of innovation, the practice of fieldwork
and the narratives these produce, particularly as represented in the work of Latour.
It argues that Latour’s ethnographic studies of science and technology
parody a variety of sociological and literary genres, particularly detective
fiction, and that he uses this literary device as a way of pinpointing unexpected
links between fictional and sociological modes of investigation. In
Latour’s hands, parody illuminates important issues of fieldwork practice
and becomes an innovative method that problematizes conventional sociological
narratives and practice.
Altheide, D.
and
Johnson, M.
(1998) ‘Criteria for Assessing Interpretive
Validity in Qualitative Research’, in
N.K. Denzin
and
Y.S. Lincoln
(eds) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Material, pp.
283-312.
London: Sage
.
2.
Ashmore, M.
(1989) The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of
Scientific Knowledge.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
3.
Atkinson, P.
(1996) Sociological Readings and Re-readings.
Aldershot: Avebury
.
4.
Atkinson, P.
and
Coffey, A.
(1995) ‘Realism and its Discontents: On the
Crisis of Cultural Representation in Ethnographic Texts’, in
P. Adam
and
S. Allan
(eds) Theorizing Culture: An Interdisciplinary Critique After
Postmodernism, pp. 41-57.
New York: New York University Press
.
5.
Atkinson, P.
,
Coffey, A.
,
Delamont, S.
,
Lofland, J.
and
Lofland, L.
(eds) (2001) Handbook of Ethnography.
London: Sage
.
6.
Barry, A.
(2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological
Society.
London and New York: Continuum
.
7.
Becker, H.
(1986) ‘Telling About
Society’, in Doing Things Together, pp.
121-136.
Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press
.
8.
Bingham, N.
and
Thrift, N.
(2003) ‘New Directions for Travellers: On Michel
Serres and Bruno Latour’, in
M. Crang
and
N. Thrift
(eds) Thinking Space, pp. 281-301.
London: Routledge
.
9.
Brewer, J.D.
(2000) Ethnography.
Buckingham: Open University Press
.
10.
Callon, M.
(2004)
‘Europe Wrestling with Technology’
, Economy and Society33(1):
121-134
.
11.
Callon, M.
and
Latour, B.
(1992) ‘Don’t Throw The Baby Out With
The Bath School! A Reply to Collins and Yearley’, in
M. Pickering
(ed.) Science as Practice and Culture, pp.
343-368.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
12.
Cobb, R.
(1976a) ‘Maigret’s
Paris’, in Tour de France, pp.
179-184.
London:Duckworth & Co Ltd.
13.
Cobb, R.
(1976b) ‘The Geography of
Simenon’, in Tour de France, pp.
185-189.
London: Duckworth & Co Ltd.
14.
Cobb, R.
(1976c) ‘Maigret Retired’, in
Tour de France, pp. 195-199.
London: Duckworth & Co Ltd.
15.
Collins, H.M.
(1984) ‘Researching Spoonbending: Concepts and
Practice of Participatory Fieldwork’, in
C. Bell
and
H. Roberts
(eds) Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice, pp.
54-69.
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
.
16.
Collins, H.M.
and
Yearley, S.
(1992a) ‘Epistemological
Chicken’, in
M. Pickering
(ed.) Science as Practice and Culture, pp.
283-300.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
17.
Collins, H.M
and
Yearley, S.
(1992b) ‘Journey into Space’,
in
M. Pickering
(ed.) Science as Practice and Culture, pp.
369-389.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
18.
Crawford, T.H.
and
Latour, B.
(1993)
‘An Interview with Bruno Latour’
, Configurations1(2):
247-268
.
19.
De Laet, M.
(2000)
‘Patents, Travel, Space: Ethnographic Encounters with Objects in Transit’
, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18(2):
149-168
.
20.
Deleuze, G.
and
Guattari, F.
(1988) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and
Schizophrenia, Volume 2.
London: Athlone Press
.
Denzin, N.K.
(2000) ‘The Practices and Politics of
Interpretation’, in
N.K. Denzin
and
Y.S. Lincoln
(eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp.
897-922.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
24.
Denzin, N.K.
and
Lincoln, Y.S.
(eds) (1998) Handbook of Qualitative Research.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
25.
Eco, U.
(1983) The Name of the Rose.
London: Secker & Warburg
.
26.
Ericson, R.
(1993) Making Crime: A Study of Detective Work.
Toronto: Toronto University Press
.
27.
Ericson, R.
and
Haggerty, K.
(1997) Policing the Risk Society.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
28.
Frisby, D.
(1992)
‘Between the Spheres: Seigfried Kraceur and the Detective Novel’
, Theory, Culture and Society9(2):
1-22
.
29.
Frisby, D.
(2001) ‘The City Detected: Representations and
Realities of Detection’, in Cityscapes of Modernity:
Critical Explorations.
Cambridge: Polity
.
30.
Giere, R.N.
and
Moffatt, B.
(2003)
‘Distributed Cognition: Where the Cognitive and the Social Merge’
, Social Studies of Science33(2):
301-310
.
31.
Glover, D.
(1979)
‘Sociology and the Thriller’
, Sociological Review27(1):
21-40
.
32.
Greenwood, P.
,
Chaiken, J.
and
Petersilia, J.
(1977) The Criminal Investigation Process.
Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.
33.
Hammersley, M.
(1990) Reading Ethnographic Research.
London: Longman
.
34.
Hammersley, M.
(1993)
‘The Rhetorical Turn in Ethnography’
, Social Science Information32(1):
23-37
.
35.
Hertz, R.
(ed.) (1997) Reflexivity and Voice.
London: Sage
.
36.
Hetherington, A.
and
Law, J.
(2000)
‘Guest Editorial: After Networks’
, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18(2):
127-132
.
37.
Hopper, S.
(1995) ‘Reflexivity in Academic
Culture’, in
B. Adam
and
S. Allan
(eds) Theorizing Culture: An Interdisciplinary Critique After
Postmodernism, pp. 58-69.
New York: New York University Press
.
38.
Innes, M.
(2003) Investigating Murder: Detective Work and the Police
Response to Criminal Homicide.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
39.
Kermode, F.
(1983) ‘Novel and Narrative’,
in
G.W. Most
and
W.W. Stowe
(eds) The Poetics of Murder: Detective Fiction and Literary
Theory, pp. 175-198.
San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
.
40.
Latour, B.
(1980)
‘The Three Little Dinosaurs or a Sociologist’s Nightmare’
, Fundamenta Scientiae1:
79-85
.
41.
Latour, B.
(1988) ‘The Politics of Explanation: An
Alternative’, in
S. Woolgar
(ed.) Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of
Knowledge, pp. 155-176.
London: Sage
.
42.
Latour, B.
(1990) ‘Drawing Things
Together’, in
M. Lynch
and
S. Woolgar
(eds) Representations in Scientific Practice, pp.
19-68.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
43.
Latour, B.
(1996) Aramis or The Love of Technology.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
44.
Latour, B.
(1997a) ‘On Actor-Network Theory: A Few
Clarifications’, URL (consulted 23 October 2003): http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/stt/stt/ant/latour.htm
45.
Latour, B.
(1997b)
‘Trains of Thought: Piaget, Formalism, and the Fifth Dimension’
, Common Knowledge6(3):
170-191
.
46.
Latour, B.
(1999a) ‘Morality and Technology: The End of the
Means’, URL (consulted 10 April 2004): http://www.ensmp.fr/%7Elatour/articles/article/080-en.html
47.
Latour, B.
(1999b) ‘On Recalling ANT’,
in
J. Law
and
J. Hassard
(eds) Actor Network Theory and After, pp.
15-25.
Oxford, Malden, MA: Blackwell
.
48.
Latour, B.
(1999c) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of
Science Studies.
Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press
.
49.
Latour, B.
(2000)
‘When Things Strike Back’
, British Journal of Sociology51(1):
105-123
.
50.
Latour, B.
(2002) ‘Gabriel Tarde and the End of the
Social’, in
P. Joyce
(ed.) The Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social
Sciences, pp. 117-132.
London: Routledge
.
51.
Latour, B.
(2003) ‘The Promises of
Constructivism’, in
D. Ihde
(ed.) Chasing Technology: Matrix of Materiality, pp.
27-46. Indiana Series for the Philosophy of
Science,
Indiana University Press
.
52.
Latour, B.
(2004) ‘On Using ANT for Studying Information
Systems: A (Somewhat) Socratic Dialogue’, in
C. Avgerou
,
C. Ciborra
, and
F. Land
(eds) The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology:
Innovation, Actors and Contexts, pp. 62-76.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
53.
Latour, B.
and
Woolgar, S.
(1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific
Facts.
Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press
.
54.
Laurier, E.
and
Philo, C.
(1999)
‘X-morphising: A Review Essay of Bruno Latour’s Aramis
or the Love Of Technology’
, Environment and Planning A31(6):
1047-1071
.
55.
Law, J.
and
Mol, A.
(eds) (2001) Complexities in Science, Technology and
Medicine.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
.
56.
Lee N.M.
and
Brown, S.D.
(1994)
‘Otherness and The Actor-Network: The Undiscovered Continent’
, American Behavioral Scientist37(6):
772-790
.
57.
Mandel, E.
(1984) Delightful Murder: A Social History of the Crime
Story.
London: Pluto Press
.
58.
Manning, P.
(2003) Policing Contingencies.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
59.
Mol, A.
(2000) ‘Pathology and the Clinic: An
Ethnographic Presentation of Two Atheroscleroses’, in
M. Lock
,
A. Young
and
A. Cambrioso
(eds) Living and Working with the New Medical Technologies, pp.
82-102.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
60.
Mulkay, M.
(1985) The Word and the World: Explorations in the Form of
Sociological Analysis.
London: George Allen and Unwin
.
61.
Murdoch, J.
(1998)
‘The Spaces of Actor-Network Theory’
, Geoforum29(4):
357-374
.
62.
Paget, M.
(1995) ‘Performing the Text’,
in
J. Van Maanen
(ed.) Representation In Ethnography, pp.
222-242.
London: Sage
.
63.
Perry, N.
(1994) ‘Am I Rite? Or Am I Write? Or Am I Right?
A New Zealand Reading of the Singing Detective’, in N. Perry
The Dominion of Signs, pp. 97-109.
Auckland: Auckland University Press
.
64.
Powell, M.
(1998)
‘Crime and the City Solution: Crime Fiction, Urban Knowledge, and
Radical Geography’
, Antipode30(4):
357-378
.
65.
Robbe-Grillet, A.
(1966) The Erasers.
London: Calder and Boyars
.
66.
Rose, M.A.
(1993) Parody: Ancient, Modern, and Post-modern.
Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
.
67.
Rowland, S.
(2000) From Agatha Christie to Ruth Rendell: British Women
Writers in Detective and Crime Fiction.
Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
68.
Ruthven, K.K.
(1979) Critical Assumptions.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
69.
Sanders, W.B.
(1977) Detective Work: A Study of Criminal
Investigations.
New York: Free Press
.
70.
Serres, M.
and
Latour, B.
(1995) Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time.
Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
.
71.
Stowe, W.W.
(1983) ‘From Semiotics to Hermeneutics: Modes of
Detection in Doyle and Chandler’, in
G.W. Most
and
W.W. Stowe
(eds) The Poetics of Murder: Detective Fiction and Literary
Theory, pp. 366-384.
San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
.
72.
Tyler, S.
(1986) ‘Post-Modern Ethnography: From Document
of the Occult to Occult Document’, in
J. Clifford
and
G. Marcus
(eds) Writing Culture, pp. 122-140.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
73.
Whatmore, S.
(2003) ‘Generating
Materials’, in
M. Pryke
,
G. Rose
and
S. Whatmore
(eds) Using Social Theory: Thinking Through Research, pp.
89-104.
London: Sage
.
74.
Woolgar, S.
(1988) ‘Reflexivity is the Ethnographer of the
text’, in
S. Woolgar
(ed.) Knowledge and Reflexivity, pp. 14-34.
London: Sage
.
75.
Worpole, K.
(1983) Dockers and Detectives.
London: Verso
.
