This research note reports the results of a comparison of face-to-face interviewing with telephone interviewing in a qualitative study. The study was designed to learn visitors’ and correctional officers’ perceptions of visiting county jail inmates. The original study design called for all face-to-face interviews, but the contingencies of fieldwork required an adaptation and half of the interviews were conducted by phone. Prior literature suggested that the interview modes might yield different results. However, comparison of the interview transcripts revealed no significant differences in the interviews. With some qualifications, we conclude that telephone interviews can be used productively in qualitative research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aquilino, W.S. (1992) ‘ Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing for Household Drug Use Surveys ’, International Journal of the Addictions27(1): 71–91 .
2.
Aquilino, W.S. (1994) ‘ Interview Mode Effects in Surveys of Drug and Alcohol Use: A Field Experiment ’, Public Opinion Quarterly58: 210–240 .
3.
Aquilino, W.S. and Sciuto, L.L. (1990) ‘ Effects of Interview Mode on Self-Reported Drug Use ’, Public Opinion Quarterly55(3): 362–395 .
4.
Babbie, E. (1986) The Practice of Social Research. Belmont: Wadsworth .
5.
Blee, K.M. (2002) Inside Organized Racism: Women in the Hate Movement. University of California Press .
6.
Creswell, J.W. (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
7.
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994) ‘Introduction: Entering the Field of Qualitative Research’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 1–17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
Fontana, A. and Frey, J.H. (1994) ‘Interviewing: The Art of Science’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 361–376. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
10.
Glense, C. and Peshkin, A. (1992) Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. New York: Longman .
11.
Greenfield, T.K., Midanik, L.T. and Rogers, J.D. (2000) ‘ Effects of Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interview Modes on Reports of Alcohol Consumption ’, Addiction95(20): 277–284 .
12.
Hamm, M.S. and Ferrell, J. (1998) ‘Confessions of Danger and Humanity’, in J. Ferrell and M.S. Hamm (eds) Ethnography at the Edge: Crime, Deviance, and Field Research, pp. 254–272. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press .
13.
Harvey, C.D. (1988) ‘ Telephone Survey Techniques ’, Canadian Home Economics Journal38(1): 30–35 .
14.
Jordan, L.A., Marcus, A.C. and Reeder, L.G. (1980) ‘ Response Styles in Telephone and Household Interviewing: A Field Experiment ’, Public Opinion Quarterly44(2): 210–222 .
15.
Kahn, R. and Cannell, C. (1957) The Dynamics of Interviewing. New York: John Wiley .
Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I.S. (1995) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
24.
Scully, D. (1990) Understanding Sexual Violence: A Study of Convicted Rapists. New York: Routledge .
25.
Sobin, C., Weissman, M.M., Goldstein, R.B., Adams, P., Wickramaratne P., Warner V. and Lish J.D. (1993) ‘ Diagnostic Interviewing for Family Studies: Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Methods for the Diagnosis of Lifetime Psychiatric Disorders ’, Psychiatric Genetics3(4): 227–333 .
26.
Sturges, J.E. (1999) ‘An analysis of interpersonal and group relationships of correctional officers and visitors at county jail’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
27.
Tausig, J.E. and Freeman, E.W. (1988) ‘ The Next Best Thing to Being There: Conducting the Clinical Research Interview by Telephone ’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry58(3): 418–427 .
28.
Weissman, A.N., Steer, R.A. and Lipton, D.S. (1987) ‘ Estimating Illicit Drug Use Through Telephone Interviews and the Randomized Response Technique ’, Drug & Alcohol Dependence18(3): 225–233 .
29.
Williams, T.E., Dunlap, B., Johnson, D. and Hamid, A. (2001) ‘Personal Safety in Dangerous Places’, in J.M. Miller and R. Tewksbury (eds) Extreme Methods: Innovative Approaches to Social Science Research, pp. 216–238. Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
