This article explores women’s use of humor in recounting their experiences and involvement in social justice movements and community groups. The author’s approach is qualitative and reflexive and explicitly presents her struggle with her role as a researcher/activist. She explores issues of relationship, solidarity and conflict in qualitative research, particularly feminist methodologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, P.A. and Adler, P. (1993) ‘Ethical Issues in Self-Censorship’, in C.M. Renzetti and R. M. Lee, Researching Sensitive Topics, pp. 249–266. Newbury, CA: Sage .
2.
Barreca, R. (1991) ‘Getting It: Strategies for Recognizing and Using Gender Differences in Humor’. They Used to Call me Snow White... But I Drifted: Women’s Strategic Use of Humor, pp. 1–37. New York: Penguin . http://condor.depaul.edu/~mwilson/extra/humor/snowedt1.html
3.
Becker, H.S. (1993) ‘Theory: The Necessary Evil’, in D.J. Flinders and G.E. Mills (eds) Theory and Concepts in Qualitative Research, pp. 218–229. New York, Teachers College Press .
4.
Behar, R. (1993) Translated Woman: Crossing the Border with Esperanza’s Story. Boston, MA: Beacon .
5.
Billig, M. (2001a) ‘ Humour and Hatred: The Racist Jokes of the Ku Klux Klan ’, Discourse & Society12(3): 267–289 .
6.
Billig, M. (2001b) ‘ Humour and Embarrassment: Limits of “Nice-Guy” Theories of Social Life ’, Theory, Culture & Society18(5): 23–43 .
7.
Boxer, D. and Cortés-Conde, F. (1997) ‘ From Bonding to Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display ’, Journal of Pragmatics27: 275–294 .
8.
Broussine, M., Davies, F. and Scott, J.C. (1999) ‘Humour at the edge: An inquiry into the use of humour in British social work’, Bristol Business School Teaching and Research Review, 1. http://www.uwe.ac.uk/bbs/trr/Issue1/IS1-2.htm (accessed 2 May 2003).
9.
Burman, H. and Jiwani, Y. (2002) ‘Introduction’, in H. Burman and Y. Jiwani (eds) In the Best Interests of the Girl Child: Phase II Report, pp. 1–13. The Alliance of Five Research Centres on Violence .
10.
Canadian Friends of Burma (2002) Looted Land, Proud People: The Case for Canadian Action in Burma. Report.
11.
Charles, N. (1996) ‘Feminist Practices: Identity, Difference, Power’, in N. Charles and F. Hughes (eds) Practicing Feminism, Identity, Difference, Power, pp. 1–37). London: Routledge .
12.
Clifford, J. (1986) ‘Ethnographic Allegory’, in J. Clifford and G.E. Marcus (eds) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, pp. 98–121. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
13.
Critchley, S. (2002) On Humour. New York: Routledge .
14.
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1998) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage .
15.
DeVault, M. (1986) Talking and Listening from Women’s Standpoint: Feminist Strategies for Analysing Interview Data. New York: The Society for the Study of Symbolic Interactionism .
16.
Diemert Moch, S. (2000) ‘The Researcher Experience as Described in Published Reports’, in S. Diemert Moch and M.F. Gates (eds) The Researcher Experience in Qualitative Research, pp. 127–140. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage .
17.
Downe, P.J. (1999) ‘ Laughing When it Hurts: Humor and Violence in the Lives of Costa Rican Prostitutes ’, Women’s Studies International Forum22(1): 63–78 .
18.
Driessen, H. (1997) ‘Humour, Laughter and the Field: Reflections from Anthropology’, in J. Bremmer and H. Roodenburg (eds) A Cultural History of Humour, pp. 222–241. Malden, MA: Polity Press .
19.
Dubberly, W.S. (1993) ‘Humour as Resistance’, in M. Hammersley and P. Woods (eds) Gender and Ethnicity in Schools: Ethnographic Accounts, pp. 75–94. London: Routledge .
20.
Ellingson, L.L. (1998) ‘ “Then You Know How I Feel”: Empathy, Identification, and Reflexivity in Fieldwork ’, Qualitative Inquiry4(4): 492–514 . December.
21.
Fine, G.A. (1993) ‘ Ten Lies of Ethnography: Moral Dilemmas of Field Research ’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography22(3): 267–294 .
22.
Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S. and Wong, L. (2000) ‘For Whom? Qualitative Research, Representations, and Social Responsibilities’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn), pp. 107–131. Thousand Oaks: Sage .
23.
Garratt, D. and Hodkinson, P. (1998) ‘ Can there be Criteria for Selecting Research Criteria? A Hermeneutical Analysis of an Inescapable Dilemma ’, Qualitative Inquiry4(4): 515–539 . December.
24.
Gillooly, E. (1991) ‘ Women and Humor ’, Feminist Studies17: 473–491 .
25.
Greer, K. (2002) ‘ Walking an Emotional Tightrope: Managing Emotions in a Women’s Prison ’, Symbolic Interaction25(1): 117–139 .
26.
Griffiths, L. (1998) ‘ Humour as Resistance to Professional Dominance in Community Mental Health Teams ’, Sociology of Health & Illness20(6): 874–895 .
27.
Harrison, J., MacGibbon, L. and Morton, M. (2001) ‘ Regimes of Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research: The Rigors of Reciprocity ’, Qualitative Inquiry7(3): 323–345 . June.
28.
Holmes, J. (2000) ‘ Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace ’, Discourse Studies2(2): 159–185 .
29.
Honan, E., Knobel, M., Baker, C. and Davies, B. (2000) ‘ Producing Possible Hannahs: Theory and the Subject of Research ’, Qualitative Inquiry6(1): 9–32 . March.
30.
hooks, b. (1990) Yearning: Race, Gender and Cultural Politics. Boston: South End Press .
31.
hooks, b. (1995) Killing Rage: Ending Racism. New York: Henry Holt & Company .
32.
Humphries, B. (1997) ‘ From Critical Thought to Emancipatory Action: Contradictory Research Goals ’, Sociological Research Online2: 1–9 .
33.
Hunt, S.A. and Benford, R.D. (1997) ‘Dramaturgy and Methodology’, in G. Miller and R. Dingwall (eds) Context and Method in Qualitative Research, pp. 106–118. Thousand Oaks: Sage .
34.
Lather, P. (1986) ‘ Research as Praxis ’, Harvard Educational Review56(3): 257–276 .
35.
Lather, P. (1993) ‘ Fertile Obsession: Validity after Poststructuralism ’, Sociological Quarterly34: 673–693 .
36.
Lugones, M.C. and Spelman, E.V. (1999) ‘Have we got a Theory for you! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism and the Demand for “The Woman’s Voice”’, in M. Pearsall (ed.) Women and Values: Readings in Recent Feminist Philosophy, pp. 14–24. Toronto: Wadsworth .
37.
Maguire, P. (1993) ‘Challenges, Contradictions, and Celebrations: Attempting Participatory Research as a Doctoral Student’, in P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall and T. Jackson (eds) Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada, pp. 157–177). Toronto: Cise Press and The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education .
38.
Marino, D. (1997) Wild Garden: Art, Education, and the Culture of Resistance. Toronto: Between the Lines .
39.
Mayer, R. and Ouelet, F. (1991) Méthodologie de Recherche pour les Intervenants Sociaux. Montréal: Gaëtan Morin .
40.
Maynard, M. (1994) ‘Methods, Practice and Epistemology: The Debate about Feminism and Research’, in M. Maynard and J. Purvis (eds) Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective, pp. 10–26. London: Taylor & Francis .
41.
Merriam, S.B. (1998) ‘Dealing with Validity, Reliability, and Ethics’, Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education, pp. 198–220. San Francisco: Jossey Bass .
42.
Mohanty, C.T. (2003) Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durkham, NC: Duke University Press .
43.
Moustakas, C. (1990) Heuristic Research: Design, Methodology, and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
44.
Narayan, U. (1988) ‘ Working Together Across Difference: Some Considerations on Emotions and Political Practice ’, Hypatia38(3).
45.
Norum, K.E. (2000) ‘ Black (W)holes: A Researcher’s Place in her Research ’, Qualitative Sociology23 (3): 319–340 .
46.
Oakley, A. (1998) ‘ Gender, Methodology and People’s Ways of Knowing: Some Problems with Feminism and the Paradigm Debate in Social Science ’, Sociology32 (4): 707–731 .
47.
Olesen, V.L. (2000) ‘Feminisms and Qualitative Research at and into the Millennium’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn), pp. 215–255. Thousand Oaks: Sage .
48.
Patton, M.Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage .
49.
Platt, J. (1981) ‘ On Interviewing One’s Peers ’, British Journal of Sociology32(1): 75–91 .
50.
Powell, C. (1988) ‘A Phenomenological Analysis of Humour in Society’, in C. Powell and E.C. Paton (eds) Humour in Society: Resistance and Control, pp. 86–105. London: Macmillan Press .
51.
Powell, C. and Paton, E.C. (eds) (1988) Humour in Society: Resistance and Control. London: Macmillan Press .
52.
Ratcliffe, J.W. (1983) ‘ Notions of Validity in Qualitative Research Methodology ’, Knowledge5(2): 147–167 .
53.
Reinharz, S. (1979) On Becoming a Social Scientist. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
54.
Ristock, J.L. and Pennell, J. (1996) Community Research as Empowerment: Feminist Links, Postmodern Interruptions. Toronto: Oxford University Press .
55.
Robinson, D.T. and Smith-Lovin, L. (2001) ‘ Getting a Laugh: Gender, Status, and Humour in Task Discussions ’, Social Forces80(1): 123–158 .
56.
Russell, D. (2002) ‘Self-Deprecatory Humour and the Female Comic: Self-Destruction or Comedic Construction?’ Third Space. http://www.thirdspace.ca/articles/druss.htm (accessed 3 June 2002).
57.
Scheurich, J.J. (1997) Research Method in the Postmodern. London: Falmer Press .
58.
Schutz, C.E. (1976) ‘ The Psycho-Logic of Political Humour ’, in A.S. Chapman and H.C. Foot (eds) It’s a Funny Thing Humour. International Conference on Humour and Laughter. Cardiff 13–17 July 1976. Toronto: Pergamon Press.
59.
Scott, J.C. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
60.
Scott, J.C. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
61.
Sev’er, A. and Ungar, S. (1997) ‘ No Laughing Matter: Boundaries of Gender-Based Humour in the Classroom ’, Journal of Higher Education68(1): 87–105 .
62.
Smith, D.E. (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press .
63.
Smith, L.T. (1999) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research on Indigenous Peoples. New York: Zed Books .
64.
St Pierre, E.A. (1997) ‘ Methodology in the Fold and the Irruption of Transgressive Data ’, Qualitative Studies in Education10(2): 175–189 .
65.
Tang, N. (2002) ‘ Interviewer and Interviewee Relationships Between Women ’, Sociology36(3): 703–721 .
66.
Tétreault, M.A. (2000) ‘Women, Power, and Politics: Observations Toward Conclusions’, in M.A. Tétreault and R.L. Teske (eds) Feminist Approaches to Social Movements, Community and Power, Volume one: Conscious Acts and the Politics of Social Change, pp. 273–283. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press .
67.
Tierney, W.G. (1996) ‘ Leadership and Postmodernism: On Voice and the Qualitative Method ’, Leadership Quarterly7(3): 371–383 .
68.
Van Manen, M. (2001) Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy (2nd edn). London, ON: Althouse Press .
69.
Wadsworth, G. (2000) ‘ Hearing Midlife Voices: Assessing Different Methods For researching Women’s Experiences of Menopause and Midlife ’, Women’s Studies International Forum23(5): 645–654 .
70.
Warren, C.A.B. (1980) ‘ Data Presentations and Audience: Responses, Ethics, and Effects ’, Urban Life9: 282–308 .
71.
Weston, K. (1996) ‘Requiem for a Street Fighter’, in E. Lewin and W.L. Leap (eds) Out in the Field: Reflections of Lesbian and Gay Anthropologists, pp. 274–286. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press .
72.
Wilkinson, S. (1998) ‘ Focus Groups in Feminist Research: Power, Interaction, and the Co-construction of Meaning ’, Women’s Studies International Forum21(1): 111–125 .
73.
Zerwekh, J.V., Smithbattle, M.L., Diekemper, M. and Drake, M.A. (2000) ‘Qualitative Research Experience with a Community Focus’, in S. Diemert Moch and M.F. Gates (eds) The Researcher Experience in Qualitative Research, pp. 35–53. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
